Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 英文小說教學與英文閱讀能力之關聯性探討及學生態度之研究
An Approach to Teaching the English Novel to High School Students in Taiwan: its Correlations with English Reading Ability and the Students’ Attitudes to Novel Reading and Teaching
作者 鄒文仁
貢獻者 羅狼仁
Phillips,Brian David
鄒文仁
關鍵詞 英文小說教學
英文閱讀能力
學生態度
關聯性探討
Teaching the English Novel
English Reading Ability
Students` Attitudes
Novel Reading and Teachin
日期 2006
上傳時間 17-Sep-2009 16:37:31 (UTC+8)
摘要 論文內容摘要:本研究探討對台灣的高中生教導一本完整英文原著小說與其閱讀能力的關聯性以及學生們對於小說閱讀和小說課的態度。
     
     一、 研究方法:
     1. 受試者為台北地區某一所高中高一的124名學生,其指定讀物為C.S.Lewis所著之小說「獅子、女巫、魔衣櫥」,所進行的小說閱讀和教學從2005年九月至2006年元月為期四個月,以每週一節課的時間用於小組討論和發表,並由教師導引上課流程,受試者須完成課後作業單並繳交給教師評閲。
     2. 在施教前和施教後分別對受試者實施閱讀能力前測及後測,復加之以成對母體t檢定,以檢驗全體受試者和高中低不同能力組別學生的前後測差異,此外亦實施ㄧ有關小說內容的開書測驗,以便檢驗受試者了解小說的程度,以及蒐集受試者的期末考英文成績(考的是英文課本)。研究者檢驗了以下三種測驗時間相當接近的測驗中任兩種之間的關聯:閱讀能力後測、小說測驗、期末考英文測驗。
     3. 最後,小說閱讀和教學的問卷調查由受試者填完,並以頻率和百分比分析全體受試者,而以卡方檢定分析在受教前有無閱讀其他英文小說經驗和受教後是否讀完整本小說之差異。
     
     二 、研究結果
     1. 在小說教學結束後,受試者的英文閱讀能力不只顯著地提升,而且與小說測驗成績顯著相關。
     2. 而對全體受試者和中低成就組學生而言,小說測驗成績則和期末考成績顯著相關。
     3. 對中成就組學生而言,閱讀能力後測成績和期末考英文成績有顯著相關。
     4. 受試者對於英文小說閱讀的反應正面多過於負面的有:對於讀小說的感覺、對於增進英文閱讀速度及字彙的幫助、提升學習英文興趣的幫助。而對於是否增進英文文法知識與幫助課本學習,只有少數學生持肯定態度。
     5. 受試者對於小說課及其活動的態度呈高度肯定,對於再教一本英文小說的反應十分熱烈。
     6. 讀完指定小說確實與未讀完者在「認為讀指定小說提升今後讀英文小說的意願」上有顯著不同,而受教前讀過其他小說與教學後讀完小說者,則皆比未讀過其他小說及未讀完指定小說者,更願意在時間許可下自行閱讀英文小說。
     7. 受試者的閱讀技巧增進從多到少依次為:閱讀理解、字彙、文法句型。
     
     三 、結論:
      英文小說閱讀做為一種延伸閱讀其對高中學生學習英文的幫助,不只是認知上的也是情意上的,與其讓學生自行摸索閱讀英文小說之道,將之當作課堂學習教材並施以教學將更能有效幫助學生。本研究證明英文小說在台灣高中英文課程為一門值得教的課,而非僅是一種單單留給學生自行閱讀即可的讀物。
The present study explored the correlations of teaching a complete English novel to high school students in Taiwan with their reading ability and investigated their attitudes to the novel reading and the novel class. The subjects were 124 freshmen students of a senior high school in Taipei, whose assigned material was the novel The Lion, the Witch & the Wardrobe by C.S. Lewis. The reading and teaching of the novel lasted a semester from Sept. 2005 to Jan. 2006, with one period of English class each week spent on small group discussion and presentation monitored and facilitated by the teacher. After-reading worksheets were done by the subjects and handed in for teacher review and assessment. A reading pretest and a post-test were administered to the subjects before and after the treatment, and their reading ability improvement was examined using Paired T tests for all subjects and different ability groups from high to middle and low proficiency groups. Besides, an open-book novel test concerning the content of the novel was given to find out how well the subjects understand the novel. The subjects’ scores of the final periodic test on the English textbook were also gathered so that the researcher could investigate the correlations, with Significant Correlation tests, between any two of the three tests which all took place near the end of the semester: the reading post-test, the novel test and the final periodic test. Finally the questionnaires on the novel reading and teaching were filled in by the subjects and analyzed based on the subjects as a whole with frequency and percentage. Furthermore, distinctions were made based on the differences between those subjects who had read other novels before the treatment and those who hadn’t, and on the differences between those who finished reading the novel and those who didn’t, with Chi-square tests.
      The major findings of the study are as follows:
     1. After the treatment ended, the English reading proficiency of all subjects in general has increased significantly, and was found to be correlated with the novel test significantly.
     2. The novel test was found to be significantly correlated to the final periodic test for all subjects and the Middle and Low Proficiency Groups.
     3. For the Middle Proficiency Group., the post-test was correlated to the final periodic test significantly.
     4. The subjects’ more positive responses than negative ones to the novel reading included: feelings about the novel, how the novel reading helped increase reading speed and vocabulary, how the novel helped raise their interest in learning English. As to whether reading the novel increased English grammar knowledge or helped them learn the English textbook, only a minority of them answered positively.
     5. The subjects’ attitudes towards the novel class and its activity were highly positive and the responses to having another English novel taught were quite enthusiastic.
     6. Having finished reading the novel made a difference for the subjects in believing reading the designated novel promoted their willingness to read more English novels, while being experienced novel readers and having finished reading the novel both made significant differences in the subjects’ willingness to read other English novels on their own when time is allowed for reading.
     7. The reading benefits for our subjects in order of importance were: reading comprehension, vocabulary, and grammar and sentence patterns.
      In conclusion, novel reading, as a form of extensive reading, helps senior high school students learn English cognitively as well as affectively. Instead of letting the students grope their own ways to the English novel, it helps them more when the novel becomes the class material and is taught in class. This study explores the English novel as a worthwhile course to teach in high school curriculum in Taiwan, not just as something left for the students to read all by themselves.
參考文獻 Black, Thomas R. (1999). Doing Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Brown, H.D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (4th ed.).
NY: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Brown, H.D. (2001). Teaching by Principles (2nd ed.). NY: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Burns, Anne. (1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carr, D. (1967). A Second Look at Teaching Reaading and Composition. TESOL
Quarterly, 1(1), 30-34.
Chou, Y.L. (2002). The Effects of Short Stories on English Conjunction Instruction
for EFL Students in Vocational High School. Abstract retrieved August 24, 2005.
from http:// 192.191.58.195/cgi-bin/theabs/a/flyweb.cgi?p=57491&I=133872&t= 17&o=v5
Custodio, B.& Sutton, M/J. (1998). Literature-Based ESL for Secondary School
Students. TESOL Journal, Autumn 1998, 19-23.
Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Heaton, J.B. (1988). Writing English Language Tests. Essex, England: Addison
Wesley Longman Limited.
Hinkel, Eli. (2006). Current Perspectives on Teaching the Four Skills. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 109-131.
Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for Language Teachers (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Johnson, Keith. (2001). An Introduction to Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.
Krashen, S. D.& Terrel T. D. (1983). The Natural Approach. Hayward, CA: Alemany Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and Principles in language Teaching (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lazar, Gillian. (1996). Exploring Literary Texts With the Language Learner. TESOL
Quarterly, 30(4), 773-779.
Lewis, C.S. (2002). The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. New York: Harper Collins
Publishers.
Lightbown, P.M., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus-on-Form and Corrective Feedback in
Communicative Language Teaching. In H. Douglas Brown & Susan Gonzo (Eds.), Readings on Second Language Acquisition (pp.306-330). NJ: Prentice Hall Regent.
Lightbown, P.M., & Spada, N. (1996). How Languages are Learned (Rev. ed.).
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Long, Michael H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In Gass & Madden (Eds.). (1985). Input in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Long, Michael H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, William C. and Bhatin, T. K. (Eds.). (1996). Handbook of Secong Language Acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
MaKay, S. (1982). Literature in the ESL Classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 16(4),
529-536.
McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of Second Language Learning. London: Edward
Arnold.
McLaughlin, Barry, Rossman, Tammi, and McLeod, Beverly. (1983). Second language learning: An information-processing perspective. Language Learning 33: 135-158.
Moran, Patrick R. (2001). Teaching Culture: Perspective in Practice. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nation, I.S.P. (2005). Teaching and learning vocabulary. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research on second language teaching and learning (pp. 581-596). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Nunan, David. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oller, John W. (1983). Story writing principles and ESL teaching. TESOL Quarterly 17: 39-53.
Papalia, Anthony. (1987). Interaction of reader and text. In Wilga M. Rivers (Ed.), Interactive Language Teaching (pp.70-82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pearsal, J. (Ed.). (1998). The New Oxford Dictionary of English. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Perrine, L. (1985). Literature: Structure, Sound and Sense. New York: Harcourt Brace
Javanovich, Inc.
Pica, T., Young, R., & Doughty, C. (1987). The Impact of Interaction on
Comprehension. In Ronald M. Barasch & C. Vaughn James (Eds.). Beyond the
Monitor Model. (pp.97-119). MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Povey, J.F. (1967). Literature in TESL Programs: The Language and the Culture.
TESOL Quarterly, 1(2), 40-46.
Rapoport, R. N. (1970). The three dilemmas in action research. Human Relations, 23(6): 499.
Reber, Teresa. (2001). Effective teaching behaviors and attitudes as perceived by foreign language teachers. Ph. D. dissertation. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona.
Richard, J. C., Rodgers, T.S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching
(2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schumann, J. (1978). The acculturation model for second language acquisition. In R. Gingras (ed.). Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Seda, M.M., Liguor, O.Z., Seda, C.M. (1999). Bridging literacy and Social Studies:
Engaging Prior Knowledge Through Children’s Books. TESOL Journal, Autumn
1999, 19(4), 703-725.
Spack, Ruth. (1985). Literature, Reading, Writing, and ESL: Bridging the Gaps. TESOL Quarterly, 19(4), pp.703-725.
Tsou, P.Y. (2002). Teaching the Excerpted Short Stories in Senior High School
Textbooks in Taiwan. Abstract retrieved August 24, 2005. from http://
192.191.58.195/cgi-bin/theabs/1/flyweb.cgi?p=57491&I=133872&t=17&o=v4
Yeh, J.C. (2004). The Applications of Short Stories and Cooperative Learning in an
EFL Senior High School Classroom. Abstract retrieved August 24, 2005. from
http:// 192.191.58.195/cgi-bin/theabs/1/flyweb.cgi?p=57491&I=133872&t= 17&o=v2
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班
92951006
95
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0929510062
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 羅狼仁zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Phillips,Brian Daviden_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 鄒文仁zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 鄒文仁zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2006en_US
dc.date.accessioned 17-Sep-2009 16:37:31 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-Sep-2009 16:37:31 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-Sep-2009 16:37:31 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0929510062en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33450-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92951006zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 95zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 論文內容摘要:本研究探討對台灣的高中生教導一本完整英文原著小說與其閱讀能力的關聯性以及學生們對於小說閱讀和小說課的態度。
     
     一、 研究方法:
     1. 受試者為台北地區某一所高中高一的124名學生,其指定讀物為C.S.Lewis所著之小說「獅子、女巫、魔衣櫥」,所進行的小說閱讀和教學從2005年九月至2006年元月為期四個月,以每週一節課的時間用於小組討論和發表,並由教師導引上課流程,受試者須完成課後作業單並繳交給教師評閲。
     2. 在施教前和施教後分別對受試者實施閱讀能力前測及後測,復加之以成對母體t檢定,以檢驗全體受試者和高中低不同能力組別學生的前後測差異,此外亦實施ㄧ有關小說內容的開書測驗,以便檢驗受試者了解小說的程度,以及蒐集受試者的期末考英文成績(考的是英文課本)。研究者檢驗了以下三種測驗時間相當接近的測驗中任兩種之間的關聯:閱讀能力後測、小說測驗、期末考英文測驗。
     3. 最後,小說閱讀和教學的問卷調查由受試者填完,並以頻率和百分比分析全體受試者,而以卡方檢定分析在受教前有無閱讀其他英文小說經驗和受教後是否讀完整本小說之差異。
     
     二 、研究結果
     1. 在小說教學結束後,受試者的英文閱讀能力不只顯著地提升,而且與小說測驗成績顯著相關。
     2. 而對全體受試者和中低成就組學生而言,小說測驗成績則和期末考成績顯著相關。
     3. 對中成就組學生而言,閱讀能力後測成績和期末考英文成績有顯著相關。
     4. 受試者對於英文小說閱讀的反應正面多過於負面的有:對於讀小說的感覺、對於增進英文閱讀速度及字彙的幫助、提升學習英文興趣的幫助。而對於是否增進英文文法知識與幫助課本學習,只有少數學生持肯定態度。
     5. 受試者對於小說課及其活動的態度呈高度肯定,對於再教一本英文小說的反應十分熱烈。
     6. 讀完指定小說確實與未讀完者在「認為讀指定小說提升今後讀英文小說的意願」上有顯著不同,而受教前讀過其他小說與教學後讀完小說者,則皆比未讀過其他小說及未讀完指定小說者,更願意在時間許可下自行閱讀英文小說。
     7. 受試者的閱讀技巧增進從多到少依次為:閱讀理解、字彙、文法句型。
     
     三 、結論:
      英文小說閱讀做為一種延伸閱讀其對高中學生學習英文的幫助,不只是認知上的也是情意上的,與其讓學生自行摸索閱讀英文小說之道,將之當作課堂學習教材並施以教學將更能有效幫助學生。本研究證明英文小說在台灣高中英文課程為一門值得教的課,而非僅是一種單單留給學生自行閱讀即可的讀物。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The present study explored the correlations of teaching a complete English novel to high school students in Taiwan with their reading ability and investigated their attitudes to the novel reading and the novel class. The subjects were 124 freshmen students of a senior high school in Taipei, whose assigned material was the novel The Lion, the Witch & the Wardrobe by C.S. Lewis. The reading and teaching of the novel lasted a semester from Sept. 2005 to Jan. 2006, with one period of English class each week spent on small group discussion and presentation monitored and facilitated by the teacher. After-reading worksheets were done by the subjects and handed in for teacher review and assessment. A reading pretest and a post-test were administered to the subjects before and after the treatment, and their reading ability improvement was examined using Paired T tests for all subjects and different ability groups from high to middle and low proficiency groups. Besides, an open-book novel test concerning the content of the novel was given to find out how well the subjects understand the novel. The subjects’ scores of the final periodic test on the English textbook were also gathered so that the researcher could investigate the correlations, with Significant Correlation tests, between any two of the three tests which all took place near the end of the semester: the reading post-test, the novel test and the final periodic test. Finally the questionnaires on the novel reading and teaching were filled in by the subjects and analyzed based on the subjects as a whole with frequency and percentage. Furthermore, distinctions were made based on the differences between those subjects who had read other novels before the treatment and those who hadn’t, and on the differences between those who finished reading the novel and those who didn’t, with Chi-square tests.
      The major findings of the study are as follows:
     1. After the treatment ended, the English reading proficiency of all subjects in general has increased significantly, and was found to be correlated with the novel test significantly.
     2. The novel test was found to be significantly correlated to the final periodic test for all subjects and the Middle and Low Proficiency Groups.
     3. For the Middle Proficiency Group., the post-test was correlated to the final periodic test significantly.
     4. The subjects’ more positive responses than negative ones to the novel reading included: feelings about the novel, how the novel reading helped increase reading speed and vocabulary, how the novel helped raise their interest in learning English. As to whether reading the novel increased English grammar knowledge or helped them learn the English textbook, only a minority of them answered positively.
     5. The subjects’ attitudes towards the novel class and its activity were highly positive and the responses to having another English novel taught were quite enthusiastic.
     6. Having finished reading the novel made a difference for the subjects in believing reading the designated novel promoted their willingness to read more English novels, while being experienced novel readers and having finished reading the novel both made significant differences in the subjects’ willingness to read other English novels on their own when time is allowed for reading.
     7. The reading benefits for our subjects in order of importance were: reading comprehension, vocabulary, and grammar and sentence patterns.
      In conclusion, novel reading, as a form of extensive reading, helps senior high school students learn English cognitively as well as affectively. Instead of letting the students grope their own ways to the English novel, it helps them more when the novel becomes the class material and is taught in class. This study explores the English novel as a worthwhile course to teach in high school curriculum in Taiwan, not just as something left for the students to read all by themselves.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents Page
     Acknowledgments......................................................................................................iv
     Chinese Abstract.......................................................................................................xvi
     English Abstract......................................................................................................xviii
     Tables of Contents……………………………………………………………………v
     List of Tables………………………………………………………………………...xi
     
     Chapter One
     1. Introduction..............................................................................................................1
      1.1 Motivation & Goal……………………………………………………………...1
      1.2 Purpose of the Study…………………………………………………………....2
      1.3 Significance of the Study………………………………………………….........3
      1.4 Research Questions……………………………………………………………..3
     
     Chapter Two
     2. Literature Review………………………………………………………………….5
      2.1 The Episode Hypothesis and The Affective Filter Hypothesis…………………5
     2.1.1 The Episode Hypothesis…………………………………………………5
     2.1.2 The Affective Filter Hypothesis…………………………………………6
      2.2 The Input Hypothesis, The ‘Just Read’ Proposal and
     McLaughlin’s Attention-Processing Model…………………………………….7
     2.3 The Acculturation Model and the Novel as an Aid to EFL Learning…………..8
     2.4 Communicative Language Teaching and the Interaction Hypothesis…………10
     2.4.1 Communicative Language Teaching……………………………….........10
     2.4.2 The Interaction Hypothesis……………………………………………...10
     2.5 The Natural Approach…………………………………………………………12
     2.5.1 How to Choose an Appropriate Text and Its Reading Goal..………........12
     2.5.2 Intervention……………………………………………………………...14
     2.6 Action Research….………………………………………….………………...14
     2.7 Summary………………………………………………………………………15
     
     Chapter Three
     3. Methodology…………………………………………………………….………..16
      3.1 Overview……………………………………………………………….……...16
     3.2 Subjects…………………………………………………………………….….17
     3.3 Materials……………………………………………………………………….17
      3.3.1 The Novel The Lion, the Witch & the Wardrobe ………………….........18
      3.3.2 The After-reading Worksheets and Portfolios..………………...………..19
      3.3.3 The Three Kinds of Tests Involved………………………..….…………19
      3.3.4 The Questionnaire on the Novel…………………………………………20
     3.4 Rationale, Procedure and What to Do When Teaching…...…………...………..21
     3.5 Data Analysis……………………………………………………………….......23
      3.5.1 Reading Ability Improvement……………………………………….........23
      3.5.2 Correlation to the Improvement…………………………………………..23
      3.5.3 The Questionnaire…………………………………………………….......23
      3.5.3.1 Why Is the Previous Basis Discarded and What Is in Place……..23
      3.5.3.2 Feelings about the Novel…………………………………….......25
      3.5.3.3 The Subjects’ Reading Ability Increase from Reading
     the Novel…………………………………………………………25
      3.5.3.4 How Reading the Novel Helps the Subjects Learn the
     Textbook and Raise Interest in Learning English………………..26
      3.5.3.5 Attitudes to the Novel Class……………………………………...26
      3.5.3.6 Possibility of Future Novel Reading and Teaching………………26
      3.5.3.7 How the Responses Concerning Reading Ability and
     Real Reading Ability Improvement Correspond…………………27
     
     Chapter Four
     4. Results……………………………………………………………………….……28
      4.1 Reading Ability Improvement in General and among Different
     Ability Groups………………………………………………………………...28
     4.2 Correlations with the Reading Ability Improvement…………………….........29
      4.2.1 For All Subjects………………………………………………………….29
      4.2.2 For the High Proficiency Group……………………………………........30
      4.2.3 For the Middle Proficiency Group…………………………………........30
      4.2.4 For the Low Proficiency Group…………………………………………31
     4.3 The Questionnaire……………………………………………………………..32
      4.3.1 The Overall Responses…………………………………………………..32
      4.3.2 How Being Experienced Novel Readers or Not Differs………………...35
      4.3.2.1 Being Experienced Novel Readers or Not Differs……………...36
      4.3.2.2 Self-perceptions of the Subjects’ English ability Increase…..….38
      4.3.2.3 The Questions with the Most “Unclear” Responses………...….39
      4.3.2.4 The Questions Receiving the Most Positive Responses..............40
      4.3.2.5 About the Novel Class…………………………………………..41
      4.3.3 How Having Finished Reading the Novel or Not Differs……………….43
      4.3.3.1 Having Finished Reading the Novel or Not Differs…………….43
      4.3.3.2 The English Ability Questions………………………………….45
      4.3.3.3 The Questions with the Most “Unclear” Responses……...…….47
      4.3.3.4 The Questions Receiving the Most Positive Responses..............47
      4.3.3.5 About the Novel Class………………………………………….48
     4.4 How the Responses Concerning Reading Ability and the Gain of Scores
     on the Posttest Correspond…………….…………………………………........50
     
     Chapter Five
     5. Discussion and Conclusions…………………………………………………..….53
      5.1 Discussion of the Findings ………………………………………………........53
      5.1.1 Reading Ability Increase for All Subjects and Different
     Ability Groups………………………………………………………….53
      5.1.2 The Overall Responses in the Questionnaire to the Novel
     Reading and Teaching…………………………………………………..55
      5.1.2.1 The Feelings about the Novel…………………………………...55
      5.1.2.2 What Gains Were Believed to Be Made
     Due to the Novel Reading……………..……………………....56
      5.1.2.3 The Attitudes the Subjects Held Toward the Novel Class
     Activity……………………………………………………........56
      5.1.2.4 The Attitudes the Subjects Held Toward Reading More
     English Novels, Interest in English Learning and Having
     Another English Novel Taught to Them in Future…..….............57
      5.1.3 The Experienced/ First-time Novel Readers’ Reponses to
     the Novel Reading and Teaching……………………………………….57
     5.1.3.1 The Feelings of the Experienced/ First-time Novel Readers
     about the Novel……………………………………………........57
      5.1.3.2 What Gains Were Believed to Be Made
     Due to the Novel Reading by the Experienced/
     First-time Novel Readers…………………………….................58
      5.1.3.3 The Attitudes the Experienced/First-time Novel Readers
     Held Toward the Novel Class Activity…………………............58
      5.1.3.4 The Attitudes the Experienced/ First-time Novel Readers
      Adopted Toward Reading More English Novels in Future
      and Having Another English Novel Taught to Them…………..59
      5.1.4 The Finished/ Not Finished Readers’ Responses to the Novel
     Reading and Teaching……………………………………………..........59
     5.1.4.1 The Feelings of the Finished /Not Finished Novel Readers
     about the Novel……………………………………………........59
      5.1.4.2 What Gains Were Believed to Be Made
     Due to the Novel Reading by the Subjects Who
     Finished/ Did Not Finish Reading the Novel…………………...60
      5.1.4.3 What Sub-skills of Reading Ability Were Believed to
     Increase Due to the Novel Reading by the Subjects Who
     Finished/ Did Not Finish Reading the Novel…………………...60
      5.1.4.4 Reading Through the Novel Made the Subjects More
     Likely to Read More English Novels in Future…...……..…..…61
      5.1.4.5 The Attitudes of the Finished/Not Finished Novel
     Readers to Having Another Novel Taught to Them……………61
      5.1.5 Responses vs. Reality………………………………………………........62
      5.1.5.1 The Reading Gains Related Responses and the Score Gains
     on the Posttest…………………………………………………...62
      5.1.5.2 The Novel Reading and the Textbook Study,
     Which Helped Which ?................................................................63
      5.2 Pedagogical Limitations………………………………………………….........64
     5.3 Limitations of the Study………………………………………………….........65
     5.4 Suggestions for Further Research……………………………………………..66
     
     References…………………………………………………………………………..67
     Appendixes………………………………………………………………………….71
      A. After-reading Worksheets...............................................................................71
      B. Test on the Novel The Lion, the Witch & the Wardrobe……………….........84
      C. 納尼亞英文小說讀後問卷調查 …………………………………………..86
     D. The Questionnaire on and the Response to the "Narnia" Novel After It
      Was Taught......................................................................................................87
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 169265 bytes-
dc.format.extent 24605 bytes-
dc.format.extent 41986 bytes-
dc.format.extent 49448 bytes-
dc.format.extent 257181 bytes-
dc.format.extent 58484 bytes-
dc.format.extent 25963 bytes-
dc.format.extent 164737 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0929510062en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 英文小說教學zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 英文閱讀能力zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 學生態度zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 關聯性探討zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Teaching the English Novelen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) English Reading Abilityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Students` Attitudesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Novel Reading and Teachinen_US
dc.title (題名) 英文小說教學與英文閱讀能力之關聯性探討及學生態度之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) An Approach to Teaching the English Novel to High School Students in Taiwan: its Correlations with English Reading Ability and the Students’ Attitudes to Novel Reading and Teachingen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Black, Thomas R. (1999). Doing Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, H.D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (4th ed.).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) NY: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, H.D. (2001). Teaching by Principles (2nd ed.). NY: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Burns, Anne. (1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Carr, D. (1967). A Second Look at Teaching Reaading and Composition. TESOLzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Quarterly, 1(1), 30-34.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chou, Y.L. (2002). The Effects of Short Stories on English Conjunction Instructionzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) for EFL Students in Vocational High School. Abstract retrieved August 24, 2005.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) from http:// 192.191.58.195/cgi-bin/theabs/a/flyweb.cgi?p=57491&I=133872&t= 17&o=v5zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Custodio, B.& Sutton, M/J. (1998). Literature-Based ESL for Secondary Schoolzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Students. TESOL Journal, Autumn 1998, 19-23.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxfordzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Heaton, J.B. (1988). Writing English Language Tests. Essex, England: Addisonzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wesley Longman Limited.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hinkel, Eli. (2006). Current Perspectives on Teaching the Four Skills. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 109-131.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for Language Teachers (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridgezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Johnson, Keith. (2001). An Introduction to Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Krashen, S. D.& Terrel T. D. (1983). The Natural Approach. Hayward, CA: Alemany Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and Principles in language Teaching (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lazar, Gillian. (1996). Exploring Literary Texts With the Language Learner. TESOLzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Quarterly, 30(4), 773-779.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lewis, C.S. (2002). The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. New York: Harper Collinszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lightbown, P.M., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus-on-Form and Corrective Feedback inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Communicative Language Teaching. In H. Douglas Brown & Susan Gonzo (Eds.), Readings on Second Language Acquisition (pp.306-330). NJ: Prentice Hall Regent.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lightbown, P.M., & Spada, N. (1996). How Languages are Learned (Rev. ed.).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oxford: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Long, Michael H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In Gass & Madden (Eds.). (1985). Input in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Long, Michael H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, William C. and Bhatin, T. K. (Eds.). (1996). Handbook of Secong Language Acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) MaKay, S. (1982). Literature in the ESL Classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 16(4),zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 529-536.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of Second Language Learning. London: Edwardzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Arnold.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McLaughlin, Barry, Rossman, Tammi, and McLeod, Beverly. (1983). Second language learning: An information-processing perspective. Language Learning 33: 135-158.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Moran, Patrick R. (2001). Teaching Culture: Perspective in Practice. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nation, I.S.P. (2005). Teaching and learning vocabulary. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research on second language teaching and learning (pp. 581-596). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nunan, David. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oller, John W. (1983). Story writing principles and ESL teaching. TESOL Quarterly 17: 39-53.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Papalia, Anthony. (1987). Interaction of reader and text. In Wilga M. Rivers (Ed.), Interactive Language Teaching (pp.70-82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pearsal, J. (Ed.). (1998). The New Oxford Dictionary of English. Oxford: Oxfordzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Perrine, L. (1985). Literature: Structure, Sound and Sense. New York: Harcourt Bracezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Javanovich, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pica, T., Young, R., & Doughty, C. (1987). The Impact of Interaction onzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Comprehension. In Ronald M. Barasch & C. Vaughn James (Eds.). Beyond thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Monitor Model. (pp.97-119). MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Povey, J.F. (1967). Literature in TESL Programs: The Language and the Culture.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) TESOL Quarterly, 1(2), 40-46.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rapoport, R. N. (1970). The three dilemmas in action research. Human Relations, 23(6): 499.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reber, Teresa. (2001). Effective teaching behaviors and attitudes as perceived by foreign language teachers. Ph. D. dissertation. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Richard, J. C., Rodgers, T.S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teachingzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schumann, J. (1978). The acculturation model for second language acquisition. In R. Gingras (ed.). Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Seda, M.M., Liguor, O.Z., Seda, C.M. (1999). Bridging literacy and Social Studies:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Engaging Prior Knowledge Through Children’s Books. TESOL Journal, Autumnzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1999, 19(4), 703-725.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Spack, Ruth. (1985). Literature, Reading, Writing, and ESL: Bridging the Gaps. TESOL Quarterly, 19(4), pp.703-725.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tsou, P.Y. (2002). Teaching the Excerpted Short Stories in Senior High Schoolzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Textbooks in Taiwan. Abstract retrieved August 24, 2005. from http://zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 192.191.58.195/cgi-bin/theabs/1/flyweb.cgi?p=57491&I=133872&t=17&o=v4zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yeh, J.C. (2004). The Applications of Short Stories and Cooperative Learning in anzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) EFL Senior High School Classroom. Abstract retrieved August 24, 2005. fromzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http:// 192.191.58.195/cgi-bin/theabs/1/flyweb.cgi?p=57491&I=133872&t= 17&o=v2zh_TW