| dc.contributor.advisor | 張鼎國 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 劉育兆 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | 劉育兆 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2005 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 17-Sep-2009 16:49:46 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 17-Sep-2009 16:49:46 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 17-Sep-2009 16:49:46 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0891540041 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33474 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 89154004 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 94 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 在全球化的處境之下，有許多問題無法繼續依賴傳統的方式來解決，特別是關於正義，以及需要人類擔負起共同責任的問題。於是，建立一套放諸四海皆準的倫理學便成了當務之急。當代哲學家阿佩爾承繼了康德倫理學的基本架構，並在語用學轉向的思潮下，將它由獨我論式的倫理轉化為以「先驗語用學」來終極奠基之「論述倫理學」。論述倫理學以「論辯」為其核心概念，主張在進行論辯時，有應當遵循之「不可規避的」若干預設。一旦否定了那些預設，便不可能藉由溝通達成共識，甚至會導致「實行上的自我矛盾」。阿佩爾的論述倫理學也強調它具有應用的面向，亦即它也處理了在歷史的現實情境中，如何促成實質的道德規範的問題。藉由提出後約定俗成式的道德，來將責任落實在既有的諸般制度之上。本文試圖闡述論述倫理學的先驗奠基與普世應用的雙重特性，這使得它足以作為一套普遍的「巨型倫理學」，而能替全球化帶來的問題提供解決之道。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒 論……………………………………………………1第一節 全球化處境對倫理學的挑戰與新解決方案的提出……1第二節 阿佩爾的學思背景………………………………………5第三節 論文架構與目的…………………………………………15第二章 第一哲學的三個典範轉移……………………………17第一節 第一哲學前兩個過渡典範的轉移………………………191.「存有學式形上學」典範：以亞里斯多德為例示…………192.「意識–主體哲學」典範的形成與其缺失…………………22第二節 語言分析哲學與「對語言-溝通之先驗概念的構思」…29第三節 先驗語用學作為第一哲學的最佳典範…………………331.普爾斯的符號學架構…………………………………………332.「語言遊戲說」與「言說行動理論」的啟發………………362.1後期維根斯坦的語言遊戲說與其不足……………………372.2言說行動理論的啟發………………………………………383.先驗語用學：從康德到普爾斯再到阿佩爾…………………393.1普爾斯對康德先驗哲學的轉化………………………………393.2語言分析哲學的抽離謬誤與先驗語用學的克服……………42第三章 論述倫理學奠基與應用之雙面性………………………48第一節 論述倫理學之終極奠基的問題……………………………511.批判理性主義與阿伯特「閔區豪森的三難」的提出…………512.阿佩爾對批判理性主義之「後設批判式的」檢驗與其發現…532.1阿伯特對終極奠基進路的批評並不成立………………………552.2可錯論原則和不可懷疑的憑據預設並不相抵觸……………572.3先驗語言遊戲的可能性與必要性……………………………603. 非/後形上學式終極奠基的倫理學面向……………………61第二節 合理性類型理論…………………………………………661.科技的合理性類型……………………………………………682.哲學反思性的合理性類型……………………………………693.經驗–詮釋性的合理性類型…………………………………704.倫理的合理性類型……………………………………………715.辯證–策略性的合理性類型…………………………………73第三節 論述倫理學的應用面及其主要原則……………………761.論述倫理學特有的應用問題…………………………………762.論述倫理學的幾個主要原則…………………………………79(1)普遍化原則…………………………………………………80(2)行為原則……………………………………………………81(3)補全原則……………………………………………………82第四章 總結與檢討…………………………………………841.阿佩爾對高達美詮釋學的「歷史主義–相對主義」批評………842.對論述倫理學的整體回顧與對本文的檢討……………………86附錄：阿佩爾簡要年表………………………………………………90參考書目………………………………………………………………92 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 11323 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 17567 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 15859 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 240074 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 424577 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 424501 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 148276 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 17733 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 118902 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0891540041 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 阿佩爾 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 先驗語用學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 論述倫理學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 先驗符號學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Apel | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Transcendental pragmatics | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Discourse ethics | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | transcendental semiotics | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | macroethics | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 阿佩爾論述倫理學研究:語用學轉向中的先驗奠基與普世應用 | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Apel, Karl-Otto之著作 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ⅰ. BOOKS | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1.Transformation der Philosophie, Bd.Ⅰ&Ⅱ, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1973[1993] | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2.Karl-Otto Apel: Selected Essays, vol. 1&2, ed. Eduardo Mendieta, Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, c1994-1996 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3.Towards a Transformation of Philosophy, Milwaukee, Wis.: Marquette University Press, 1998 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4.From a Transcendental-Semiotic Point of View, Manchester, U.K.; New York: Manchester University Press; New York: Distributed exclusively in the USA by St. Martin`s Press, 1998 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5.The Response of Discourse Ethics to the Moral Challenge of the Human Situation as Such and Especially Today, Mercier Lectures, Louvain-la-Neuve, March 1999 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 6.Diskurs und Verantwortung: Das Problem des Übergangs zur postkonventionellen Moral, Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1988 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 7.Diskursethik und Diskusanthropologie: AachenerVorlesungen, by Apel/ Marcel Niquet, Frieburg; München: Alber, 2002 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ⅱ. ESSAYS | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1.“What is Philosophy? The Philosophical Point of View after the End of Dogmatic Metaphysics”, What is Philosophy? , C. P. Ragland and Sarah Heidt (eds.), New Haven: Yale University Press, c2001 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2.“Is the Ethics of the Ideal Communication Community an Utopia? On the Relationship between Ethics, Utopia and Critique of Utopia”, The Communicative Ethics Controversy, Seyla Benhabib and Fred Dallmayr (eds.), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990, pp. 23-59 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3.“The Problem of a Universalistic Macroethics of Co-responsibility”, What Right does Ethics Have?: Public Philosophy in a Plauralistic Culture, Sander Griffoen (eds.), VU University Press, 1990, pp. 23-40 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4.“Globalization and the Need for Universal Ethics”, European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 3, No, 2, May 2000, pp. 137-155 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5.“My Intellectual Biography in the Context of Contemporary Philosophy”, 1998 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 6.“Universal Principles and Particular Decisions and Forms of Life”, Value and Understanding: Essays for Peter Winch, Raimond Gaita (eds.), London ; New York : Routledge, 1990 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 7.“On the Relationship between Ethics, International Law and Political-Military Strategy in Our Time: A Philosophical Retrospective on the Kosovo Conflict, European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 3, No, 2, May 2000 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 8.“Discourse Ethics as a Response to the Novel Challenges of Today’s Reality to Coresponsibility, Realism and Responsibility in Contemporary Ethics, F. Gamwell/W. Schweiker (eds.), The Journal of Religion, suppl. Vol. (1992/93) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 9.“The Cartesian Paradigm of First Philosophy: A Critical Appreciation from the Perspective of Another(the Next?) Paradigm”, International Journal of Philosophical Studies Vol. 6(1), 1998, pp.1-16, Routledge | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 10.“Types of Rationality Today: the Continuum of Reason between Science and Ethics”, Rationality to-day : La rationalite aujourd`hui, Ottawa : University of Ottawa,Canada : University of Ottawa Press, 1979 (with dicussion, pp. 340-350) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 11.“ A Planetary Macroethics foe Humankind: The Need, the Apparent Difficulty, and the Eventual Possibility”, Culture and Modernity: East-West Philosophic Perspectives, University of Hawaii Press, 1991 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 12.“Normatively Grounding “Critical Theory” through Recourse to the Lifeworld?” A Transcendental-Pragmatic Attempt to Think with Habermas against Habermas”, Philosophical Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment, Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, c1992 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 關於Apel之二手英文資料 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Benhabib, Seyla | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ——“In the Shadow of Aristotle and Hegel: Communicative Ethics and Current Controversies in Practical Philosophy”, Hermeneutics and Critical Theory in Ethics and Politics, Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, 1990 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dallmayr, Fred R. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ——Twilight of Subjectivity: Contributions to a Post-individualist Theory of Politics, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, c1981 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ——Critical Encounters: Between Philosophy and Politics, Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, c1987 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gamwell, Franklin I. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ——“Habermas and Apel on Communicative Ethics”, Philosophy& Social Criticism, vol. 23 no. 2, 1997 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gorner, Paul | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ——Twentieth Century German Philosophy, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2000 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mendieta, Eduardo | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ——The Adventures of Transcendental Philosophy: Karl-Otto Apel’s Semiotics and Discourse Ethics, U.S.A.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2002 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kettner, Matthias | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | —— “Karl-Otto-Apel’s Contribution to Critical Theory”, The Handbook of Critical Theory, Oxford, U.K.; Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers, 1996 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wellmer, Albrecht | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ——The Persistence of Modernity: Essays on Aethetics, Ethics and Postmodernism, translated by David, Midgley, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1991 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 其他英文參考資料 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gadamer, Hans-Georg | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ——Truth and Method, 2nd rev. edited and translation revised by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall, New York: Continuum, 1960[1994] | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | The Routledge Companion to Semiotics and Linguistics, edited by Paul Cobley, London and New York: Routledge, 2001 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 中文參考書目(含期刊與論文，按作者姓氏筆畫排列) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王俊斌 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 《方法論的辯證與互補的可能性：論Karl-Otto Apel之先驗語用學與教育研究》，國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，2002 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林綺雲 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 《後現代世界中的阿佩爾》，臺北：洪葉文化，2000 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林遠澤 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 〈包容性的共識或排他性的團結？站在哲學「語用學轉向」後的十字路上〉，《當代雜誌》，台北：合志文化，2002年11月，第183期，頁76-93 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 〈意義理解與行動的規範性：試論對話倫理學的基本理念、形成與限度〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，第十五卷第三期，2003年9月，頁401-29 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 〈責任倫理學的責任問題－科技時代的應用倫理學基礎研究〉，《台灣哲學研究》第四期，2005年9月，頁297-343 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 洪漢鼎 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 《詮釋學史》，台北：桂冠，2002 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 〈當代詮釋學與實踐智慧概念〉，《社會理論學報》，香港理工大學應用社會科學學系，第一卷，第二期，1998年秋季 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張鼎國 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 〈「實踐智」與新亞里思多德主義〉，《哲學雜誌》第19期，台北：業強，1997，頁66-84 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 〈海德格、高達美與希臘人〉，《哲學雜誌》第21期，台北：業強，1997，頁98-125 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 〈理解、詮釋與對話：從哲學詮釋學的觀點論多元主義〉，《多元主義》，台北：中研院社科所，1998，頁307-335 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 〈文化傳承與社會批判—回顧Habermas、Apel、Gadamer與Ricoeur間的詮釋學論爭〉，《國立政治大學哲學學報》第5期，台北：政大哲學系，1999 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 〈詮釋學論爭在爭什麼：理解對話或爭議析辯〉，《哲學雜誌》第34期，台北：業強，2001，頁32-61 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 〈「較好地」還是「不同地」理解﹖——從詮釋學論爭看經典註疏中的詮釋定位與取向問題〉，《中國文哲研究通訊》第9卷，第3期 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 〈論述倫理學中的「應用」與「責任」概念新探〉，2001，尚未發表 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 賴賢宗 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 〈阿培爾論先驗的規範奠基〉，哲思雜誌，第一卷第一期，1998年3月 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 〈阿培爾的言談倫理學中的「理性事實」與其對康德倫理學的繼承和批判〉，《現代哲學：理論與批判》，台北：師大書苑，1999年6月，頁87-107 | zh_TW |
