| dc.contributor.advisor | 李仁芳 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Lee, Jen Fang | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 江雪嬌 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Chiang, Hsueh Chiao | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 江雪嬌 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Chiang, Hsueh Chiao | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2008 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 18-Sep-2009 09:15:30 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 18-Sep-2009 09:15:30 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 18-Sep-2009 09:15:30 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0088359504 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34284 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 博士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 科技管理研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 88359504 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 97 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 近年來我國在高等教育的學校與人數上均有大幅的成長。而這些豐富的研究人力，需要充沛的研究經費予以支援學術研究工作。實務上，我國於開放高等教育機構的設立後，各界所提供的研發經費並未相對應的增加，各校為因應整體環境趨勢的改變，乃積極研議如何強化學術研究成果的擴散，以提升學術聲望並獲得更多的實質效益。本研究在此情境下，試圖從國內大學之知識創新的實務發展，建構一套研究成果擴散效益的運作模式。 大學知識產業化是知識經濟發展的趨勢，尤其基礎研究是技術發展與應用研究的主要來源。大學知識創新過程是科學知識在創新系統內的生產、運用與擴散的過程。而建立有效的成果管理機制，減少外在環境的不確定性並改善知識流動的效率，是創新系統成功的關鍵。鑑於大學係國家創新系統的重要成員之一，而創新的效率取決於系統內各成員之財務、知識、人力與法規的交流，即所謂的「三螺旋(Triple Helix)」的觀念。因此，為尋求最佳的創新系統，亟須建立有效的衡量項目，並促使創新成果在市場機制的導引下，獲得知識創新與擴散的經濟效益。如美國為因應創新系統失靈，於1980年以後，研訂一連串的相關法令，透過研發經費的補助、智財權下放與鼓勵設置專責技轉單位等措施，刺激大學將豐富的研究產出移轉到產業界，政府的研究資源分配亦更加重視目標導向與產業導向的發展計畫，結果所獲得的回收遠超過預期，其作法吸引世界各國競相仿效。我國亦於近年來透過相關法令的制定以及經費補助等措施，期望將大學的研究產出從知識的創造轉變為知識的加值與運用，以帶動產業知識化，並促進知識產業化之效益。因此，欲探討大學的成果擴散效益時，不只是依循過去大多數學者從產學合作的觀點，更應考量政府在創新過程中所扮演的角色與功能，以及將衡量國家創新系統績效之方法運用到大學的成果擴散效益的呈現上，以建立適合我國大學創新成效的衡量模式。 本研究架構從教師的「研究人力」、「研究經費」以及「產學關係」等三構念探究對於「研究產出」以及成果推廣所產生的「擴散效益」之關聯，另外，再從學校的研究成果「管理機制」以及「政府措施」等二構念探究對於其他構念所帶來的影響，以瞭解彼此之關聯，並建立適合我國大學研究投入、產出以及擴散的運作模式。 因此，除了收集國內外的文獻以歸納整理美日等國在大學研究成果擴散效益的探討內容與衡量項目外，並透過問卷調查與實地訪問國內大學教師與研究成果推廣中心(或技轉中心)主管，以瞭解國內大學研究成果的實務運作，以獲得本研究的初步架構，繼而從美日以及我國大學的個案研究，探討國家創新系統的角色所帶來的影響，以強化研究架構之各構念的關聯性。 其次，採取初級資料的收集方法，以國內大學校院教師為問卷調查對象，進行敘述統計以計算樣本的各項指標分布狀況，以信效度指標確認問卷的可靠性與有效性，並運用探索性因素分析來萃取出本研究重要之變數，再以線性結構關係模型分析本研究變數之間的關係，以驗證各構念彼此之間的關聯性。本研究獲得以下的結論：一、「研究人力」與其他構念之關聯 「研究人力」對「產學關係」有直接的正向影響，對「研究經費」、「研究產出」與「擴散效益」則有間接的正向影響效果，而且整體的影響效果是顯著的。所以，研究人力是成果散效益的基本要素，配合其他構念的運作可以對研發成果之擴散效益產生正向的影響。二、「研究經費」與其他構念之關聯 「研究經費」對於「研究產出」與「擴散效益」均沒有顯著的正向影響。顯示一味強調大學研究經費投入的作法無法帶來實質的成效，反而浪費有限的資源，因此，研究經費投入前，宜先制定一套評估機制，充分考量學校的研究人力、以往的研究產出與擴散效益之表現，以有效地配置研究經費。三、「研究產出」與其他構念之關聯 「研究產出」對於「擴散效益」有直接的正向影響，表示大學教師所創造出來的成果越多，則相對地促使成果擴散的效益越大。此外，研究產出的增加亦可影響其他構念對「擴散效益」的關聯性。因此，為提高擴散效益，學校宜積極鼓勵教師增加研究成果的產出。四、「產學關係」與其他構念之關聯 「產學關係」除了對「研究產出」與「研究經費」產生直接的正向影響外，亦間接影響「研究經費」與「研究產出」分別對「擴散效益」的關聯性。顯示產學關係可彌補大學與企業的技術落差，提高產業對學校研究成果之需求，促使教師研究產出的擴散效益更佳。五、「管理機制」與其他構念之關聯「管理機制」對「產學關係」與「擴散效益」均有直接的正向影響，顯示學校在成果管理與運用的積極作為(如技轉單位的設置、技轉人員的規模與培訓、獎勵措施的制定等)以及促進產學之間的關係可提高研究成果推廣所帶來的效益。六、政府措施與其他構念之關聯 「政府措施」不但對「擴散效益」有直接的正向影響，亦對「產學關係」有直接的正向影響，此外，對「研究經費」與「研究產出」亦有間接的正向影響。因此，未來應加強我國政府的角色，充分發揮驅動與強化的功能，解決大學研究成果擴散的管制與障礙、營造產學研發資源共享環境以提高大學研究產出的擴散效益。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | After the government lifted the restriction on the number of higher education institutes, in the past two decades the number of university in Taiwan has increased dramatically (16 in 1986, and 102 in 2008). The government apparently could not match up this increase, with its slow pace of education budget increase. The shortage of development funds from governmental agency in charge is no doubt obvious for all universities. Therefore, to receive an ample share of governmental education budget has become competitive and even difficult. As the global economy weighs more on the generation and dissemination of knowledge nowadays, universities seems to see themselves clearer in the business picture for their role on the economic market. University officials and the government both also understand that a productive conversion of university intellectual assets, referring to knowledge-based creation or innovation, to innovation-derived benefit can be crucial for future university development. Thus, not only the university finance will be improved, its academic performance shall also be expected to enhance when this conversion is being well performed productively. An innovation management system here refers to a university system to manage its intellectual capital, such as support and process infrastructures, in facilitating the conversion process that enable the university to convert its intellectual assets into commercially viable properties. An important aspect of this study is to analyze national and international innovation management systems currently practiced in universities for greatest innovation-derived benefit. In the current of knowledge–based economic development, the knowledge-based innovations owned by universities is inevitably weighed more than ever in value. Many Universities may fall in a dilemma about how to weigh market–oriented research in comparison with fundamental scientific knowledge, since the latter never the less could lead to market–oriented innovation in the future. Furthermore, to maximize the value of innovation, it is commonly accepted that a proper management for conversion is almost as important as the producing of it. When it comes to determine the value or the benefit the innovations could bring, other than university’s innovation capability, which tends to have the potential to incubate more research outcomes, the performance of innovation management system is one of the most decisive factors. To achieve a good performance, three conditions are proposed to maintain an efficient innovation management system: an effective management mechanism, reduce adverse influences on incubating innovation assets, and increase knowledge sharing. The maintenance of such a system is then further categorized as seven conceptual indices (CIs) for later evaluation: research manpower, research grant, innovation outcomes, management mechanism, university-industry relations, government policy, and innovation-derived benefit. The first four are regarded as part of intellectual capital, while the other three are considered as strongly linked to the performance of the innovation management system currently being operated in Taiwan’s universities. They will be discussed in connection the first five CIs for their inter-relations. Since universities is under the scheme of National Innovation Systems (NIS), which covers primarily a finance and service system, a technological innovation system, and a knowledge-based innovation system, any management taking place in a university on each of any sub-system under the NIS will affect the NIS to some extent. By the same token, considering those mentioned above several conceptual indices are proposed to elucidate the results of the evaluation model applied in this study to examine similar management systems in different universities for comparison. This evaluation model is expected to help optimize the current managerial models to best meet the knowledge-based economic development needs and enlarge the innovation-derived benefit from university innovation assets.Prior to 1980s, the promotion on innovation in the U.S. was generally considered failed. To save the failing systems, the U.S. government announced a series of new regulations to promote the capitalization of academic innovations by universities. Those policy measures mainly included governmental subsidy to research grants, less constraints on intellectual property (IP) licensing, and start-ups for IP transfer. Furthermore, the government diverted more its research support into market-oriented development projects. Since such moves later resulted in a positive outcome beyond expectation, Taiwan as well as some other countries began to replicate those measures in their own countries. As the sources of future development increasingly depend on the derived benefit from innovation, the success of NSI originated by the U.S. government has indicated a new approach different from previously predominated models of solely university-industry cooperation. The involvement of government role in the NSI has been proved essential for its success. Similarly, the innovation management system being operated with the university intellectual capital to enhance the conversion to innovation-derived benefit is defined as the innovation assets management system (IAMS). It can be considered as a sub-system of the NSI, and the use of the evaluation model to examine the IAMSs can properly shows the difference among all the IAMSs by university. Furthermore, the evaluation model proposed takes account of surveys including interviews with IP transfer professionals and research professors. Cases of universities practicing the IAMS along with others published in literature are also studied to help access the relations among index items in the model. The model is constructed with several measures, including Structural Equation Model (SEM), Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), to evaluate the performance of the IAMS on successful conversion from intellectual assets into benefit. The model results are depicted with CIs as the conclusions. A qualitative survey is carried out on the evaluation of inter-relations among the seven CIs described above with Taiwan’s university educators as respondents. Confidence interval is applied to assure data reliability and validity. Significant model variables are identified using the explorative factor analysis. Finally the linear regression is applied to examine the relations among those CIs.The results of this study can be concluded as the following: 1.Research manpower It has positive influence directly towards university-industry cooperation when affecting positively towards research grant, innovation outcomes and innovation-derived benefit. The result suggests that it be the fundamental CI responsible to innovation-derived benefit. And along with other CIs, this CI could result in a comprehensive enhancement on the innovation-derived benefit. 2.Research grant It shows less significant effect over innovation outcomes and innovation-derived benefit. This conclusion indicates that the scale of innovation outcomes will not necessarily in proportion to the financial investment on research. It is suggested that a comprehensive evaluation on research manpower, innovation capability, and research capacity, etc. should be conducted prior to market-oriented investment on research. 3.Innovation outcomes This term shows a positive relation with the innovation-derived benefit. It is easy to understand that university educators with more innovation outcomes tend to receive more innovation-derived benefit. Furthermore, increase in innovation outcomes will also help induce stronger links among the other CIs towards the innovation-derived benefit. Thus, encouraging educators for more innovation outcomes is no doubt a good measure for universities. 4.University-industry relations University-industry relations bear positive influence to innovation outcomes and research grant. It also shows its positive effect on the relations between research grant to innovation-derived benefit and between innovation outcomes to innovation-derived benefit. The role of university-industry relations can be depicted as to lessen the technological gap between university and industry, facilitate the industry need for university innovation outcomes, and multiply innovation-derived benefit. 5.Management mechanism The management mechanism shows positive influence on university-industry relations and innovation-derived benefit. An effective management mechanism on innovation outcomes would directly lead to excellent benefit derived from innovation outcomes. 6.Government policy Government policy shows straight links to university-industry relations and innovation-derived benefit. It also indicates an indirect effect on enhancing both research grant and innovation outcomes. In the future, the government should play a key role in promoting universities to practice such a system and help resolve difficulties arisen. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要…………………………………………………………………i英文摘要………………………………………………………………iii目錄 …………………………………………………………………viii 圖目錄 ……………………………………………………………… xii表目錄……………………………………………………………… xiii第一章 緒論 ……………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究背景與動機 ……………………………………………1 一 研究背景 …………………………………………………1 二 研究動機 …………………………………………………4 第二節 研究問題與目的 ……………………………………………6 第三節 研究範圍與研究流程 ………………………………………10 一 研究範圍 ………………………………………………10 二 研究流程 ………………………………………………10第二章 文獻整理………………………………………………………12 第一節 大學與國家創新系統 ………………………………………12 一 國家創新系統的意涵……………………………………12 二 國家創新系統的投入與產出……………………………15 三 大學與國家創新系統的關聯 …………………………20 四 大學的投入與產出………………………………………26 五 小結………………………………………………………33 第二節 大學與智慧資本 ……………………………………………35 ㄧ 智慧資本的意涵…………………………………………35 二 智慧資本的構面…………………………………………37 三 智慧資本的衡量…………………………………………41 四 大學的智慧資本…………………………………………44 五 小結………………………………………………………46 第三節 大學的知識創新與績效 ……………………………………48 一 組織創新與績效衡量……………………………………48 二 大學的創新與績效與衡量………………………………51 三 影響大學創新績效之因素………………………………56 四 小結………………………………………………………63第三章 大學創新績效之先期探討 …………………………………65 第一節 各國大學運用國家創新系統之成效 ………………………65 一 美國………………………………………………………65 二 日本………………………………………………………71 三 台灣………………………………………………………75 四 各國比較…………………………………………………79 五 小結………………………………………………………83 第二節 我國大學研發創新之成效 …………………………………85 ㄧ 大學研發成果之推動……………………………………85 二 先期問卷調查……………………………………………88 三 資料分析…………………………………………………90 四 小結………………………………………………………93第四章 研究設計 ……………………………………………………95 第一節 研究架構與研究假設………………………………………95 一 研究架構…………………………………………………95 二 研究假設…………………………………………………96 第二節 研究變項與資料收集 ……………………………………103 一 研究變項 ………………………………………………103 二 資料收集 ………………………………………………106 第三節 資料分析方法………………………………………………108 一 敘述性統計 ……………………………………………108 二 信效度分析 ……………………………………………108 三 因素分析 ………………………………………………110 四 相關分析 ………………………………………………111 五 結構方程模式 …………………………………………111第五章 資料分析結果………………………………………………115 第一節 樣本資料特性分析 ………………………………………115 一 基本資料特性分析 ……………………………………115 二 各構念描述性統計 ……………………………………118 第二節 信效度分析與因素分析 …………………………………121 一 信效度分析 ……………………………………………121 二 探索性因素分析 ………………………………………122 三 分析結果 ………………………………………………122 第三節 整體模式衡量分析 ………………………………………134 一 模式建立 ………………………………………………134 二 測量模式分析 …………………………………………134 三 各變項與構念相關分析 ………………………………138 四 結構模式分析 …………………………………………139第六章 結論與建議 …………………………………………………145 第一節 結論…………………………………………………………145 第二節 研究建議……………………………………………………153 第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議…………………………………158參考文獻………………………………………………………………160附錄……………………………………………………………………177 附錄1 技轉中心人員訪談摘要 …………………………………177 附錄2 大學教師訪談摘要 ………………………………………180 附錄3 先期問卷調查結果 ………………………………………183 附錄4 問卷調查表 ………………………………………………188 圖 目 錄圖1. 1 研究流程圖 ……………………………………………………11圖2. 1 國家創新之角色功能示意圖 …………………………………23圖2. 2 智慧資本示意圖 ………………………………………………37圖2. 3 SKANDIA價值規劃圖 …………………………………………38圖2. 4 CIPP模式 ………………………………………………………52圖2. 5 大學與產業之關聯 ……………………………………………58圖2. 6 技術移轉連結型態 ……………………………………………60圖3. 1 美國大學技轉中心設立情形 …………………………………67圖3. 2 美國大學技轉成效 ……………………………………………68圖3. 3 史丹福大學技轉成效 …………………………………………70圖3. 4 日本大學技轉中心設立情形 …………………………………72圖3. 5 日本大學技術移轉成效 ………………………………………73圖3. 6 東京大學技轉成效 ……………………………………………75圖3. 7 我國大學技轉成效 ……………………………………………77圖3. 8 台灣大學技轉成效 ……………………………………………78圖4. 1 研究架構圖 ……………………………………………………95圖5. 1 研究模型之因素分析圖 ……………………………………133圖5. 2 路徑分析模式結果 …………………………………………144 表 目 錄表2. 1 國家科技創新構面與衡量項目 ………………………………18表2. 2 研究機構績效衡量項目 ………………………………………19表2. 3 智慧資本的構面 ……………………………………………40表2. 4 智慧資本的衡量指標 …………………………………………43表2. 5 大學的績效表 …………………………………………………54表2. 6 大學創新成效的相關研究整理表 ……………………………55表2. 7 教師、技轉中心與企業界成果擴散之動機 …………………60表3. 1 我國大學技轉中心之組成 ……………………………………76表3. 2 美國、日本與我國大學技轉法令措施之比較 ………………79表3. 3 各大學技轉中心比較表 ………………………………………82表3. 4 教師研究成果擴散經驗 ………………………………………89表3. 5 教師對校內研究成果擴散運作的看法 ………………………90表3. 6 敘述統計表 ……………………………………………………91表3. 7 各變項相關係數表 ……………………………………………92表3. 8 迴歸分析結果 …………………………………………………93表4. 1 衡量構念、項目與操作性定義………………………………105表4. 2 整體模式適配度評鑑項目及指標 …………………………114表5. 1 基本資料分析表 ……………………………………………117表5. 2 各構念變數的基本資料分析 ………………………………119表5. 3 研究人力構念之信度分析與因素分析 ……………………123表5. 4 研究經費構念之信度分析與因素分析 ……………………124表5. 5 研究產出構念之信度分析與因素分析 ……………………126表5. 6 產學關係構念之信度分析與因素分析 ……………………127表5. 7 管理機制構念之信度分析與因素分析 ……………………129表5. 8 成果擴散效益構念之信度分析與因素分析 ………………130表5. 9 政府作為構念之信度分析與因素分析 ……………………132表5. 10 測量模式適配度指 …………………………………………136表5. 11 測量模式之信效度分析表 …………………………………137表5. 12 研究因素相關係數表 ………………………………………138表5. 13 結構模式適配度指標 ………………………………………140表5. 14 結構路徑係數表 ……………………………………………140表5. 15 各構念間的間接、直接及整體效果 ………………………141表6. 1 研究假設驗證結果彙整表 …………………………………145 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 97238 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 138920 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 202665 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 131361 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 198161 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 474598 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 405863 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 299242 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 385603 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 232551 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 354054 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 311280 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0088359504 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 國家創新系統 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 智慧資本 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 創新管理系統 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 結構方程模式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | National Innovation System | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Intellectual Capital | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Innovation Management System | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Structural Equation Model,SEM | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 從國家創新系統的觀點探討大學智慧資本與成果擴散效益之關聯 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | The Relations between Intellectual Capital and the Innovation-derived Benefit in View of National Innovation System | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 中國時報論壇，民國92年10月22日. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 北澤宏一（2005），日本研究成果實用化推廣-以JST產學合作推廣為例， | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 國科會科資中心演講資料. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 台灣經濟研究所(1988).產業技術能力指標模式之研究. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 台灣經濟研究院(2003).運用學界研發能量支援產業科技創新調查計畫報告. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李仁芳（1998）.合作研發與國家創新系統.科技政策報導(SR8702),541- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 551. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 江雪嬌(2004),從國家創新系統探討大學推動研發服務業的發展, 經濟情勢暨 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 評論，10(3)，19-34. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 江雪嬌，李蕙瑩，林芳美，梅家瑜(2005).智慧資本之創造與管理運作機制— | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 從創新體系與知識產業化之觀點探討，國科會93年度研究計畫。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳安妮（2002）.剖析智慧資本.會計研究月刊，204期。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳安妮(2003).智慧資本的類別與評價機制.智慧資本的創造與管理研討會， | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 民國92年10月2日，政大公企中心. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳安妮、王泰昌、彭火樹(2002).台灣會計學術單位期刊著作表現之研究， | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 國科會社會科學研究中心計畫. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳思華、吳安妮、彭火樹等(2002).我國資訊產業智慧資本評價之研究. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 二00二經濟部技術處學界科專非技術領域學術研討會論文集，448- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 459。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳思華(2000)網際網路智慧資本與發展措施研究計畫，資策會資訊市場情報中心。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳清山（1998）.學校效能研究,台北：五南. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳清山（2000）.學校行政,台北：心理. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳榮義，林秀英(2003).台灣產業科技創新之國際競爭力.2003產業科技創 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 新:關鍵年代的科技政策與挑戰國際研討會，2003年10月30-31日，台北. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳豐祥（1998）.產學合作創新的機會與挑戰.第七屆產學管理研討會. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李怡禎(2007).智慧資本與組織績效之研究.政治大學企業管理研究所，未出 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 版之博士論文. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李廉水和傅家驥（1999）.論國家創新系統的內涵、層次、功能.1999中華民 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 國科技管理研討會，2084-2092. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林秀英(2003).政府出資之科技計畫研發成果績效運用之比較.2003年7月25日簡報資料. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林欣吾(2007).大專校院技研創新與產官學合作之研究.人才培育與競爭力之 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 研究期中發表研討會，台灣經濟研究院，2007年4月9日，台北. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林秉毅(2005).日本大學與研發機構之技術移轉辦公室促進研發成果商品化研 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 究.未出版之碩士論文，政治大學科技管理研究所. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林鴻六、郭榮富、黃汝慧、業程瑋（2005）.我國產業科技創新之智慧財產機 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 制.科技發展政策報導，3，235-258. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林東正(2003).企業市場顧客滿意構面之探討：以資訊系統委外發展為例，未 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 出版博士論文，國立台北大學企業管理學系，台北. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林碧芳(2004).中小學教師創意教學自我效能感與創意教學行為的結構方程模 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 式之檢驗.未出版之碩士論文，東海大學教育研究所. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 邱皓正（2005）.結構方程模式：LISREL的理論、技術與應用，台北：雙葉書 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 廊. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 范建得(2006).工業局簡報資料。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 翁榮銅(2003).技專校院知識資產指標建構研究，國立台灣師範大學工業教育 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 研究所未出版之博士論文. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 涂瑞德，劉江彬（1999）.美國、日本與瑞典大學技術移轉政策與模式之研 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 究.中華民國科技管理研討會，1961-1972. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 國科會（1997）.中華民國科學技術統計要覽. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 國科會（2004）.國科會成果推廣措施研討會,2004年8月16日，台北. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 國科會(2005).國科會補助專題研究計畫作業要點. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 國科會（2006a）.中華民國科學技術統計要覽. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 國科會（2006b）.技術移轉手冊. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 國科會(2007).98年度政府科技計畫概算編製暨審議作業手冊」. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 國科會企劃處，經濟部技術處(2003)，台灣地區技術創新調查報告. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 國科會科學技術資料中心(2003).國科會專利資料彙整暨產學合作與技術移轉 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 績效評量研究. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 國科會科學技術資料中心(2004).亞洲國家科學技術力論壇論文集. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 教育部(2007).科技研發資源投入策略調整-推動產學加值跨部會產學合作績 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 效目標.教育部簡報資料，2007年5月29日. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 曹添旺、賴景昌、張嘉峰（2002）.台灣經濟學術單位在Econlit資料庫的學 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 術表現.國科會社會科學研究中心計畫. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 梭羅(Leste C. Thurow)(1992).世紀之爭：競爭全球新霸主.台北：天下文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 化. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 梭羅(Leste C. Thurow)(1998).資本主義的未來.北京：中國社會科學。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 郭敏如(2005).技專校院學校效能指標及其權重建構之研究.國立彰化師範大 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 學商業教育學系未出版之碩士論文. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳怡之(2003).政府科技施政成果之智慧資本管理.，智慧資本的創造與管理 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 研討會，4-1~4-53. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳達仁(2007).由專利看美國大學科技創新研發能量的表現.評鑑雙月刊，8， | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 29-35. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳達仁、黃慕萱(2003).專利資訊與專利檢索.文華圖書館管理資訊股份有限 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 公司。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陸永昶，彭火樹（2003）.政府部門智慧資本指標發展之研究—以我國審計單位為例.創新與知識學術研討會，976-1014. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃芳銘(2002).結構方程模式:理論與應用.台北，五南出版社. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃俊英，劉江彬(1995).大學及研究機構技術移轉中心制度之建立與運作，中 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 山大學企管研究所. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃政傑、李隆盛（1996）.技職教育概論.台北，師大書苑. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃紀、湯京平、吳重禮(2001).我國政治學系所期刊著作學術表現之研究.國 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 科會社會科學研究中心計畫。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃家齊（2000）.人力資源管理、智慧資本與組織績效.2000科技整合管理國 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 際研討會，498-516，台北. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃家齊(2002).人力資源管理系統與組織績效—智慧資本的觀點.管理學報， | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 19(3)，415-450. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃慕萱（2004）.書目計量與學術評鑑—國內七所研究型大學論文發表概況分 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 析.引文分析與學術評鑑研討會論文集,135-152，台北市：國家圖書館. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃慕萱(2007).擇優公佈國內目前20%大學名單.評鑑雙月刊，7，9-22。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃慕萱，陳達仁，張翰文(2003).從專利計量的觀點評估國家科技競爭力.中 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 國圖書館學會會報，70，18-30. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 楊君琦(2000).技術移轉互動模式失靈及重塑之研究--以研究機構與中小企業 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 技術為例.未出版之博士論文，國立台灣大學商學研究所. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉江彬，黃俊英(2004).智慧財產管理總論.台北：華泰文化. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉勁楊（2002）.知識創新、技術創新與制度創新概念的再界定，科學學與科 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 學技術管理，5-8. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 德瑞克.伯克（Derek Bok）著(2003)，楊振富譯，大學何價：高等教育商業 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 化（Universities in the Marketplace：The | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Commercialization of Higher Education）, Princeton | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | University Press.台北市：天下遠見,2004 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蔡明璋、蘇國賢(2003).我國社會學系所期刊著作學術表現之研究，國科會社 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 會科學研究中心計畫. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 諾斯(Douglass C. North)，劉瑞華譯(1995).經濟史的結構與變遷 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | （Structure and Change in Economic History）.台北：時報出 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 版社. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 諶家蘭，張宗凱(1999).構成高科技產業標竿政策因素之初探.科技管理學 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 刊,4(2),67-103. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 賴香菊、黃三益(2001).台灣資訊管理學術單位在學術期刊上的發表狀況之研 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 究.國科會社會科學研究中心計畫. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 戴曉霞(2000).新世紀高等教育的展望.回顧與前瞻教育研究集刊，35-59. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 薛又軒(2002).研發成果商品化-大學技術移轉中心運作模式之探討，未出版 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 之碩士論文.國立中山大學企業管理研究所. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 魏文欽（2004）.引進技術授權意圖決定因素之實證研究-以台灣電子業為例. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 未出版之博士論文，國立台北大學企業研究所。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 羅於陵（2004），大學校院研究績效分析計畫—國際期刊論文績效指標，國科 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 會科學技術資料中心，民國93年10月。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 羅於陵、柏安東、李杏芬(2001).國家創新體系：向知識經濟轉化，國科會科 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 學技術資料中心. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 羅思嘉、張慧珠(2007)，2004-2006年台灣地區大專校院專利計量分析，評 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 鑑雙月刊，8，24-28。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 二、日文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 兒玉文雄（2004）.産学連携論考 Receiver-Active Paradigm─技術の受 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | け手主導の移転パラダイムー（產學合作論－技術接受者主導的技術移轉 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 典範）,技術と経済,449,44~53. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 坊田佳紀(1998).美、英，德,法四國的技術動向.工業技術,39(6),22-27. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 近藤正幸（2002）.對大學衍生創業的期待,技術與經濟,429,4-11. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 研究振興局研究環境.產業連攜課（2002）.二一世紀の產学官連携の在 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | り方（二十一世紀產官學合作的方法），文部科學時報,1521,50-59. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 清川寬（2004）.日本經濟產業研究所(RIETI),「日本高科技中小企業的發 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 展趨勢與政策」,推動台日新興科技小企業發展研討會，亞東關係協會科 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 技交流委員會. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 塚本芳昭（2000）.東京工業大學創造新產業技術之方式，生物科學與工 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 業,58（3）,206-209. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 三、英文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Acs, J.Z.,Varga, A. and Anselin, L(2002).Patents and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Innovation Counts as Measures of Regional Production of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | New Knowledge. Research Policy,31(7),1069-1085. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Agor,W.H.(1997).The Measurement, Use and Development of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Intellectual Capital to Increase Public Sector | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Productivity. Public Personnel Management,26(2),175-186. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | AUTM (1998). AUTM US Licensing Survey. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | AUTM (2005). AUTM US Licensing Survey. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | AUTM (2006). AUTM US Licensing Survey. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Baba, M.and Kimebappu, T.（2000）.Contemporary Development | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | of Research Cooperation in University-Industry Relations | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | in Japan. Industry & Higher Education,14(1),17-23 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bagozzi, R. P. and Y. Yi(1988). On the Evaluation of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Structural Equation Model.Journal of the Academy of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Marketing Science,16(1): 74-94. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bagozzi R.P., Yi Y. and Philips, L.W. (1991). Assessing | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | construct validity in organizational research. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Administrative Science Quarterly,36, 421-458. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Barney,J.B.(1991).Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Advantages.Journal of Management,17,99-120. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bassi,L.J. and McMurer,D.P.（1998）.Training investment can | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | mean financial performance. Training & Development,52 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (5),40-42. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Behrens,T.R. and Gray,D.O.（2001）.Unitended Consequences | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | of Cooperative Research：Impact of Industry Sponsorship | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | on Climate for Academic Freedom and Other Graduate | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | student Outcom. Research Policy,30（2）,179-199. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bercovitz, J., Feldman, M., Feller, I. and Burton, R. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | （2001）. Organizational structure as a determinant of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | academic patenting and licensing behavior: an | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | exploratory study of Duke, John Hopkins, and Penn State | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Universities.Journal of Technology Transfer,26, 21-135. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bollen,K.A.(1989).Structural Equations with Latnet | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Variable, N.Y.:Wiley. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bontis,N.（1998）. Intellectual Capital：An Exploratory | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Study That Develops Measures and Models.Management | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Decision, 36(2), 63-76. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bozeman(2000).Technology transfer and public policy：a | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | review of research and theory. Research Policy,29,627- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 655. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brooking, A.（1996）. Intellectual capital：Core Assets for | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | the Third Millenium Enterprise. Thomson Business Press, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | London, United Kingdom. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brooking, A.（1997）. The Management of Intellectual | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Capital.Long Range Planning,30(3), 364-365. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Caraynnis,D.G.and Alexer,J.（1999）.The Wealth of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Knowledge: Converting Intellectual Property to | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Intellectual Capital in Competitive Research and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Technology Management Settings. International Journal of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Technology Management, 18(3/4), 326-352. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Carlsson, B.and Fridh,A. (2002). Technology transfer in | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | United States universities: a survey and statistical | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | analysis.Journal of Evolutionary Economics,12,199-232 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Carlsson,B.,Jacobsson,S.,Holmen,M.and Rickne,A. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (2002).Innovation systems:analytical and methodological | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | issues.Research Policy, 31(2),233-245. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cohen, W.M.,Nagata, A.,Walsh, J.P.,Goto, A.and Nelson R. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | （2002）. R&D Spillovers, Patents and the Incentives to Innovate in Japan and the United States. Research Policy,31 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (8/9),1349-1367. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cooke, P.; Uranga,M. G. and Etxebarria, G.（1997）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Regional Innovation Systems: Institutional and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Organizational Dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4-5), | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | pp475-491. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cordero, R.(1990). The measurement of innovation | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | performance in the firm: an overview. Research | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Policy,19,185-192. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | structure of tests. Psychometrika, 163, 297-334. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Damanpour, F.(1991). Organizational innovation: A meta- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Academy of Management Journal,34(3),555-590. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dasgupta,P. and David, P.A.（1994）.Toward a new economics | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | of science.Research Policy,23(5),487-521. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Davenport, T.H.; Long, D. and Beers, M.C.(1998).Successful | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Knowledge Management Projects. Sloan Management Review, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 39(2),43–57 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Davenport,S. and Bibby, D.（1999）.Rethinking a National | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Innovation System; The Small Country | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | as "SME”,Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,11 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (3), 431-462. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Davenport,S; Carr,A. and Bibby,D.(2002). Leveraging talent: | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | spin-off strategy at Industrial Research,R&D Management, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 32(3),241-254 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Drucker, P. F. (1985). Principles of successful innovation. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Research Management,28(5),10-12. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dzinkowski, R. (2000).The value of intellectual capital.The | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Journal of Business Strategy,21(4),3-4. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Edvinsson,H. and Sullivan.（1996）.Developing a Model for | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Managing Intellectual Capital.European Management | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Journal,14(4), 356-364. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Edvinsson, L. and Malone, M.S. (1997).Intellectual Capital： | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Realizing your company’s true value by finding its | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | hidden roots. USA： Happer Collins. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Edwards J.R. and Bagozzi R.P.(2000).On the nature and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | direction of relationships between constructs and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | measures. Psychol. Methods,5,155–174. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Edvinsson,L.（1997）.Developing Intellectual Capital at | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Skandia. Long Range Planning,30(3),366-373 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ernst,H.(1998).Patent portfolio for strategic R&D planning. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Journal of Engineering Technology Management,15(4),279- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 308. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ernst,H.(2001).Patent Applications and Subsequent Changes | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | of Performance: Evidence from Time-Series Cross-Section | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Analysis on the Firm Level.Research Policy,30(1),143-157. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff,L.(1997). Universities and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | the Global Knowledge Economy: Triple-Helix of University- Industry- Government Relations. London: Printer. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Etzkowitz,H.（1999）.The Norms of Entrepreneurial | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Science :Cognitive Effects of the New University- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Industry Linkages.Research Policy,27(8),823-833. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Etzkowitz,H. and Leydesdorff, L.（2000）.The Dynamics of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Innovation：From National Systems and “Mode 2”to a | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Relations. Research Policy, 29(2/3),109-123. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fagerberg J.；Mowery, D.and Nelson, R.（2004）. Systems of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Innovation—A Critical Review of The State of the Art, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chapter 7 in Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Freeman. C.(1987). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | The MIT press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Freitas,Isabel Maria(2007).Exploring patterns of knowledge | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | transfer from university to industry: Do sectors matter? | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | The 6th Triple Helix Conference. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Friedman, J. and Silberman,J.(2003). University Technology | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Transfer：Do Incentive , Management and Location Matter? | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1),17-30. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fritsch,M. and Schwirten,C.(1999).Enterprise-University Co- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | operation and the Role of Public Research Institutions | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | in Regional Innovation Systems.Industry and Innovation,6 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (1),69-83. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fuijsue, K.（1998）. Promotion of Academia-Industry | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cooperation in Japan-Establishing the "Law of Promoting | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Technology Transfer from University to Industry" in | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Japan. Technovation,18(6/7), 371-381. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Furman, J. L., Stern, S and Porter, M.E.（2002）.The | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Determinants of National Innovative Capacity.Research | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Policy31（6）,pp 899-933. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Geregorio , D. D. and Shane, S.（2003）.Why do some | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Universities Generate Start-ups than Others?Research | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | policy,32(2) 209-227. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Geuna,A. and Nesta,L.J.J.（2006）. University patenting and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | its effects on academic research: The emerging European | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | evidence.Research Policy,35(6),790-807. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gibbon,M. and Johnston,R.（1974）.The roles of sciences in | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | technological innovation.Research Policy,3(3),220-242. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Goldfarb, B. and Henrekson,M.（2003）.Bottom-up versus top- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | down policies towards the commercialization of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | university intellectual property.Research Policy,32 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (4),639-658. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Granieri,M.(2003).Beyond Traditional Technology Transfer of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Faculty- Generates Inventions: Building a Bridge Toward | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | R&D. Les Nouvelles, 38(4),167-175. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Griliches, Z.(1990).Patent Statistics as Economic | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Indicators: A Survey. Journal of Economic | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Literature,92,630-653. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gruetzmacher,R.R., Khoury,S. and Willey, T.(2000).License | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Pricing- The Role of Company and University | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Complementary Assets, Les Nouvelles,45(3),116-123. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Grupp,H. and Mogee,M.E.(2004).Indicators for national | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | science and technology policy:how robust are composite | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | indicators? Research Policy,33(9),1373-1384. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hair,J.F.,Anderson,R.E.,Tatham,R.L.&Black,W.C.(1998). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Multivariate Data Analysis.N.Y.Macmillan Publishing | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Company. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hameri, A. (1996). Technology transfers between basic | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | research and industry.Technovation,16(2),51-57. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Harmon,B.,Ardishvili,A.and Cardozo,R.（1997）.Mapping the | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | university technology transfer process.Journal of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Business Venturing,12(6),423-434. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hatcher, L.(1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | system for factor analysis and structural equation | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hawkins,Richard W., Langford, Cooper H. and Sidhu,Kiran S. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (2007). University research in an “innovation | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | society”. The 6th Triple Helix Conference. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Henderson, R. ,Jaffe, A. and Trajtenberg, M.（1998）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Universities as a source of commercial technology: a | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | detailed analysis of university patenting,1965- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1988.Review of Economics and Statistics, 80,119-127. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Higgins, J. M.(1995).Innovate or evaporate: creative | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | technique for strategists.Long Range Planning,23(12),32- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 35。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Howells,J. and Mckinlay,C.(1999).Commercialisation of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | University in Europe,PREST, University of Manchester, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Feb.1999. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hubert,Saint-Onge（1996）.Tacit knowledge：the key to the | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | strategic alignment of intellectual capital.Strategy & | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Leadership, 24(2),10-14. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ines Macho-Stadler, David Perez-Castrillo and Reinhilde | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Veugelers (2007). Licensing of university inventions: | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | The role of technology transfer office. International | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Journal of Industrial Organization, 25,483-510. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jacobsson,S.(2000). University and industrial | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | transfermation: an interpretative and selective | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | literature study with special emphasis on Sweden, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Science and Policy,29(5)345-365 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jensen, R. ,Thursby, J.G.and Thursby, M.C. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | （2003）.Disclosure and licensing of University | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | innovations：The best we can do with the s**t we get to | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | work with. International.Journal of Industrial | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Organization, 21(9),1271-1330. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jensen, R. A. and Thursby, M.C.（2001）. Proofs and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | prototypes for sale: the licensing of university | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | inventions. American Economic Review , 91,240-259. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Johnson, W.H.A.(1999).An integrative taxonomy of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | intellectual capital：measuring the stock and flow of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | intellectual capital components in the firm. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | International Journal of Technology Management, 18(5- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 8),562-575. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jones-Evans,D. and Klofsten,M.(1998).Roles of the | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | university in the technology transfer process: a | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | European view. Science and Public, 25(6),373-380. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Joreskog,K.G. and Sorbom,D.(1993).LISREL 8: Structural | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbam. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. (1992).The Balanced | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Scorecard Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Business Review, 70(1),71-79. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. (1996).Using the Balanced | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Scorecard as a Strategic Management System. Harvard | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Business Review,74(1), 75-78. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kast, F. E. and Rosenzweig, J. E. (1979).Organization and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Management: A systems and Contingency Approach. McGraw- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hill. Inc., New York, NY. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Katz,R. and Tushman,M.(1983). A longitudinal study of the | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | effects of boundary spanning supervison on turnover | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | promotion in research and development. Academy of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Management Journal, 26,437-456. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kneller,R（1999）.Intellectual Property Rights and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | University- Industry Technology Transfer in Japan. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Science and Public Policy, 26(2), 113-124. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lambe,C.J.and Spekman,R.E.（1997）.Alliances, external | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | technology acquisition and discontinuous technological | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | change. Journal of Production Innovation | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Management,14,102-116. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Langford, C.H.,Hall,J.,Josty,P.,Matos,S.and Jacobson,A. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (2006). Indicators and Outcomes of Canadian university | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | research: proxies becoming goals? Research Policy ,35 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (10),1586-1598. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lee, J. and Win, H.N. (2004). Technology transfer between | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | university research centers and industry in | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Singapore,Technovation, 24(5), 433-442. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lee,Y.S.（1996）.Technology Transfer and Research | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | University: A Search for Boundaries of University- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Industry Collaboration. Research Policy ,25(6),843-863. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The triple helix: an evolutionary | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | model of innovations. Research Policy,29,243-255. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Link, A.N. and Siegel, D. S.（2005）.University – based | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | technology initiatives: Quantitative and qualitative | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | evidence. Research Policy, 34, 253-257. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lipsey, R.G.（2002）.Some Implications of Endogenous | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Technological Change for Technology Policies in | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Developing Countries. Economics of Innovation New | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tech ,11(4-5),321-351. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lundvall,B-A（1992）.National Systems of Innovation： | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive learning, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | London：Printer. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lundvall,B-A and Borrans,S.(1998). The globalizing learning | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | economy: implication for innovation policy. The European | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Commission, DGXII-TSER, Bruxelles. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Luu, N., Williams, P.,Wykes,J.and Weir T.（2001）.Invisible | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Value: The Case for Measuring and Reporting Intellectual | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Capital,ISR New Economy Issues Paper,1,1-18. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lynn, B. E.（1998）.Performance evaluation in the new | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | economy：bring the measurement and evaluation of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | intellectual capital into the management planning and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | control system. International Journal of Technology | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Management,16,162-176. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lynn,B.E.(1999).Culture and intellectual capital | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | management：a key factor in successful ICM implement. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | International Journal of Technology Management,18,591- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 818. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lyuton,E.A.（1996）.Internal Constraints to Fuller | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | University Engagement in Regional Economic Development- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Experiences in the USA.Industry and Higher Education ,10 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (2),79-87 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Macho-Stadler,I.,Perez-Castrillo,D. and Veugelers,R. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | （2006）. Licensing of university inventions: The role | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | of a technology transfer office.International Journal of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Industrial Organization, Article in Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mansfield, E.and Lee, J.Y.（1996）, The modern university | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | industrial R&D support.Research Policy,25,1047-1058 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Markham, S.K.; Lewis, R.J.; Kingon, A.I. and Zapata I.M. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | （2002）.The University’s Role in Creating radical New | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Products. International Journal of Technology Transfer | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | and Commercialization, 1(1/2),163-172 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Markman,G.D；Gianiodis,P.T.；Plan,P.H. and Balkin,D.B. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | （2005）.The Innovation speed：Transferring university | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | technology to market. Research Policy, 34,1058-1075. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mason, G.and Wagner, K.（1999）.Knowledge Transfer and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Innovation in Germany and Britain:"Intermediate | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Institution" Models of Knowledge Transfer under Strain? | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Industry and Innovation,6(1), 85-109. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Morgan,R.P.and Strickland D.E.（2001）.US University | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Research Contributions to Industry：Findings and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Conjectures.Science and Public Policy,28(2),113-121. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mowery D.C., Nelson R. and Fagerberg J.（2004）.Systems of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Innovation-A Critical Review of the State of the Art, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chapter7 in Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mowery, D.C.（1998）. The Changing Structure of the US | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | National Innovation System: Implications for | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | International Conflict and Cooperation in R&D | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Policy.Rsearch Policy,27(6),639-654 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mowery,D.C.,Nelson,R.R.,Sampat,B.N. and Ziedonis,A.A. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | （2001）.The gorwth of patenting and licensing by U.S. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dole Act of 1980.Research Policy,30(1),99-119. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Narayanan, V. K.（2001）.Managing Technology and Innovation | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | for Competitive Advantage,New Jersey：Prentice-Hall. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nelson, R. (1992). Recent writings on competitiveness: | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Boxing the compass. California Management Review,34,127- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 137. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nelson, R. R.(1993).National Innovation System: A | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | comparative Analysis.Oxford University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Niosi J.(2002).National systems of innovations are “ X- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | efficient” ( and x-effective) Why some are slow | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | learners. Research Policy ,31(2),291-302. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nonaka,I.(1994).A dynamic theory of organizational | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | knowledge creation. Organization Science,5(1),14-37. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | O’Shea,P.R.,Allen,T.J.,Chevalier,A.and Roche F.（2005）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | spinoff performance of U.S. university.Research Policy,34 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (7),994-1009. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | OECD (1999).Science, Technology, and Industry Scoreboard | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1999 : Benchmarking Knowledge-Based Economies, Paris. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | OECD (2003).Science, Technology, and Industry Scoreboard | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2003 : Benchmarking Knowledge-Based Economies, Paris. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | OECD(1976).The Measurement of Scientific and Technical | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Activities.Frascati Manual. Paris. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | OECD（1996a）.Knowledge Based Economy.OECD, Paris. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | OECD（1996b）.Technology and Industrial Performance,Paris. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | OECD（1996c）.Managing National Innovations System.Paris. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | OECD（1997）.National Innovatin Systems.Paris. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | OECD（2002）.Science, Technology and Industry Outlook.Paris. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Pavitt, K.(1988).Uses and abuses of patent statistics. In: | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Van Raan (Ed.)”.Handbook of Quantitative Studies of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Science and Technology, Elsevier, Amsterdam. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Pavitt, K.（1999）.The Social shaping of the National | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Science Base. Research Policy,27(8),793-805 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | NewYork: Free Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Prahalad, C.K.and Hamel,G.（1990）.The Core Competence of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | the Corporation.Harvard Business Review,68(May-June),79- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 91. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rappert B.;Webster A.（1997）.Regimes of Ordering: The | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Commercialization of Intellectual Property in | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Industrial: Academic Collaborations.Technology Analysis | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | & Strategic Management, 9(2),115-130. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rasmussen,E. ,Moen,Φ. and Gulbrandsen, M. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | （2006）.Initiatives to promote commercialization of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | university knowledge. Technovation, 26(4), 518-533. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Reitzig, M.(2003). What Determines Patent Value-Insights | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | from the Semiconductor Industry.Research Policy,32(1),13- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 26. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Roberts, P. W. and Dowling, G. R. (2002).Corporate | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Reputation and Sustained Superior Financial Performance. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Strategic Management Journal, 23(2),1077-1093. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rogers ,E.M. and Takegami,S.（2001）.Lessons learned about | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | technology transfer.Technovation ,21(4),253-261. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Roos, J., Roos, G.and Edvinsson,L. (1997). Intellectual | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Capital：Navigation in the new business Landscape. New | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | York：New York University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Roos, J., Roos, R., Edvinsson, L. and Dragonetti, N. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | （1998）. Intellectual Capital : Navigating in the New | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Business Landscape. New York : New York University | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rosenberg,N and Nelson,R.R(1994). American universities and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | technical advance in industry. Research Policy,23,323- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 348. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Roussel,P.A.,K.N. Saad and Erickson,T.J.（1991）.Third | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Generation R&D, Harvard Business School Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Salter, A., D’ Este, P., Pavitt, K., Scott, A., Martin, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | B., Geuna, A., Nightingale, P.and Patel, P.（2000）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Talent, Not Technology: The Impact of Publicly Funded | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Research on Innovation in the UK. Science Policy | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Research Unit, University of Sussex, UK. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sampat, B. N.（2006）.Patenting and US academic research in | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | the 20th century: The world before and after Bayh- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dole,Research Policy, 35(6),772-789. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sampat,B.N.,Mowery, D.C. and Ziedonis,A.A.（2003）.Changes | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: a | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | re-examination. International Journal of Industrial | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Organization,21(9),1371-1390. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Santoro, M.D.（2000）.Success Breeds Success: The Linkage | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | between Relationship Intensity and Tangible Outcomes in | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Industry-University Collaborative Venture.TheJournal of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | High Technology Management Research,11(2),255-273. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Schartinger, D.；Rammer, C.；Fischer, M. and Frohic, T. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | （2002）. Knowledge Interactions Between Universities and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Industry in Austria：Sectoral Pattern and Determinants. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Research Policy,31(3), 303-328. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Scheerens, J. (1990). School effectiveness research and the | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | development of process indicators of school functioning. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | School Effectiveness and School Improvement,1(1),61-80. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Segars, A. H. and Grover, V.（1998）.Strategic Information | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Systems Planning Success: An investigation of The | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Construct and Its Measurement.MIS Quarterly,139-163. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Shane, S. (2004).Encouraging University Entrepreneurship？ | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | The Effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on University Patenting | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | in the United States.Journal of Business Venturing,19 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (1),127-151. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D.A. and Link, A.N. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | （1999）.Assessing the impact of organizational | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | practices on the productivity of university technology | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | transfer offices: An exploratory study, NBER Working | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Paper 7256. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Siegel, D.S.; Waldman, D.A. and Link, A.N. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | （2003）.Assessing the impact of organizational | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | practices on the relative productivity of university | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | technology transfer offices：an exploratory study. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Research Policy, 32(1), pp27-48. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Siegel, D.S.; Waldman, D.A.; Atwater,A.D.and Link, A.N. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | （2004）.Toward a model of the effective transfer of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners： | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | qualitative evidence from the commercialization of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | university technologies.Journal of Engineering and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Technology Management,21(1/2),115-142. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Singh,Annette; Wong,Poh Kan and Ping,Ho Yuen(2007). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Understanding academic inventors:the cases of the | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | National University of Singapore,The 6th Triple Helix | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Conference. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sornn-Foriese, H.（2000）.Frontiers of Research in | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Industrial Dynamics and National System of Innovation, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Industry and Innovation, 7(1),1-13. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Stewart,T.A.(1997).Intellectual Capital：The New Wealth of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Organizations. New York：Bantam Doubleday Dell | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Publishing Group, Inc. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Stufflebeam, D. L.(1971).The releverance of the CIPP model | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | for educational account ability.Journal of Research and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Development in Education, 5(1),19-25. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sullivan, Sr P.H. and Sullivan J. P.H.(2000).Valuing | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | intangible companies: An intellectual capital | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | approach.Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(4),328-340. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tamimi N.(1998).A Second-Order Factor Analysis of Critical | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | TQM Factors,The International Journal of Quality | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Science,3(1): 71-79 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Thursby,J.and Kemp,S.（2001）.Growth and productive | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | efficiency of university intellectual property | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | licensing. Purdue University, Mimeo. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Thursby,J.and Thursby, M.C.（2001）.Industry Perspectives | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | on Licensing University Technologies. Industry & Higher | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Education, 15(4), 289-294. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Thursby,J.G.and Kemp,S. (2002). Growth and productive | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | efficiency of university intellectual property | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | licensing, Research Policy,31, 109-124. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Thursby,J.G.; Thursby,M.C.and Jensen,R.（2001）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | licensing：a survey of major US universities. Journal of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Technology Transfer ,26(1/2) , 59-72. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tijssen,R.J.W.; Buter,R.K.and VanLeeuwen,N. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | （2002）.Technological Relevance of Science: An | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Assessment of Citation Linkages Between Patents and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Research Papers. Scientometrics, 47(2), 389-412. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tushman,M.L. and O’Reilly,C.A.(1996).Winning Through | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Innovation-A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Change and renewa.MA: Harvard Business School Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Valentin,E.M.(2000).University-Industry Cooperation：A | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | framework of Benefits and Obstacles.Industry & Higher | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Education,165-172. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Van Buren,M.E.(1999).A Yardstick for Knowledge | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Management.Training & Development,53(5),71-78. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Venkatraman, N. and Ramanujam, V. (1986).Measurement of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | of Approaches. Academy of Management Review,11(4),801- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 815. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wernerfelt,B.(1984).A Resource-based View of the Firm. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Strategic Management Journal, 171-180. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | WorldBank（2000）.World development report 1999/2000.UK : | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 四、網站 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | AUTM(2006), Licensing Survey,http://www.autm.net/events/file/ AUTM_06_US% | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 20LSS_FNL.pdf | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | OECD(2006),Science,Technology and Industry | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Outlook,http://www.oecd.org/document/62/0, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2340,fr_2649_201185_37675902_1_1_1_1,00.html | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | IMD(2007), Competitiveness Scoreboard | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2007,http://www.imd.ch/ | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | research/publications/wcy/competitiveness_ | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | scoreboard.cfm | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Stanford university,http：//otl.Stanford. edu/about/ | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | resources/ startups.html | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | TOUDAI,http://www.casti.co.jp/english/about/corporate.html | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | USPTO, http://www.uspto.gov/main/glossary/ | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | WIPO,http://www.wipo.int/about- | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ip/en/studies/publications/ip_definitions.htm | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 教育部公私立大學校務資訊評鑑系統,http://twaea.cycu.edu.tw/ | zh_TW |
