Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 從路徑依賴探討後冷戰時期的北約組織發展
Path dependence and NATO after the Cold War
作者 莊景名
Chuang, Ching Ming
貢獻者 姜家雄
莊景名
Chuang, Ching Ming
關鍵詞 北約組織
歷史制度主義
路徑依賴
報酬遞增
關鍵節點
波士尼亞戰爭
後冷戰
日期 2009
上傳時間 9-Apr-2010 09:56:52 (UTC+8)
摘要 本文研究的主要問題為北大西洋公約組織(North Atlantic Treaty Organization)於後冷戰時期的發展。由於北約組織在冷戰期間的主要功能為防止蘇聯與共產勢力在歐洲地區的擴張,因此於冷戰結束後,許多學者紛紛預測北約組織將會走向衰敗的道路。過去國際關係學界皆以傳統的國際關係理論來檢視北約組織的發展,儘管各家學說皆有其獨到之處,然而仍缺乏較具說服力的定論。而本文採用歷史制度主義(historical institutionalism)中的路徑依賴(path dependence)概念來探討此議題,並將發展的範圍限定於北約組織於後冷戰時期的延續以及轉型這兩個方面。路徑依賴下包含的兩個重要概念:「報酬遞增」 (increasing returns)以及「關鍵節點」 (critical juncture),則將分別用來解釋北約組織於後冷戰時期的延續與轉型。經過研究後證實,歷史制度主義的路徑依賴概念可以用來解釋北約組織於後冷戰時期的延續與轉型,但此種分析途徑仍需要對組織的發展歷史掌握得更加詳細明確,才得以在論證組織的發展演變時,更具說服力。
參考文獻 一、中文部份
專書
史蒂芬.布蘭克(Stephen J. Blank)編,馮國震、楊紫函譯,擴張後的北約:新挑戰、新任務、新部隊(臺北:史政編譯局,民88年)。
邱恩田,北約:從冷戰到熱戰(北京:新華出版社,1999年)。
許智偉編,鈕先鍾翻譯,華沙公約組織(臺北:黎明文化,民75年)。
翁明賢、林德澔、陳聰銘著,歐洲區域組織新論(臺北:五南圖書,1994年)。
宋燕輝、焦興鎧主編,聯合國與歐美國家論文集(臺北:中央研究院歐美研究所,1997年)。
亞倫.包爾(Alan R. Ball)、蓋.彼得斯(Guy B. Peters)著,陳一新、鄧毓浩、陳景堯譯校,最新現代政治與政府(臺北:韋伯文化,民92)。
道格拉斯.諾斯(Douglas North)著,劉瑞華譯,制度制度變遷與經濟成就(臺北:時報文化,1994年)。
渠梁、韓德主編,國際組織與集團研究(北京:中國社會科學出版社,1989年11月)。
葉至誠、葉立誠着,研究方法與論文寫作(臺北:商鼎文化,1999年)。
錢武南、楊連仲譯,北約擴張與歐洲情勢譯文彙輯(臺北:國防部軍務局,民87年)。
聯合國社會發展研究所,蔡慶年、沈浦娜譯,全球化背景下的社會問題(北京:北京大學出版社,1997年)。
期刊論文
甘逸驊,「北約東擴-軍事聯盟的變遷與政治意涵」,問題與研究,第42卷第4期(民國92年7、8月),頁1-24。
甘逸驊,「冷戰結束後的北約與國際關係理論」,問題與研究,第42卷第5期(民國92年9、10月),頁1-24。
李大中,「北約之轉型:德國與大西洋兩岸秩序的重建」,問題與研究,第35卷第3期(民國85年3月),頁65-80。
胡婉玲,「論歷史制度主義的制度變遷理論」,新世紀智庫論壇,第16期(2001年12月),頁86¬-95。
徐坤明,「波黑背後的大國明爭暗鬥」,時事報告, 第3期(1994年)。
湯紹成,「後冷戰時期北大西洋公約組織角色與功能的轉變」,問題與研究,第39卷第1期(民國89年1月),頁67-78。
楊淑珩,「歐、美、俄在波黑的角逐」,和平與發展,第3期(1994年),頁30。
彭慧鶯,「戰後美國外援法案的決策運作」,問題與研究,第31卷第1
期(民國80年1月),頁63-72。
翟雲瑞,「南斯拉夫民族間內戰的由來和發展」,東歐中亞研究,第3期(1995年),頁57-61。
盧倩儀,「區域整合理論的比較與分析」,美歐季刊,第12卷第1期(1997年春季刊號),頁27-44。
博碩士學位論文
吳欣蓉,「歐盟安全自主發展與北約組織關係之研究(1990-2003)」,碩士論文,私立淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士論文,民國92年。
胡婉玲,「從新制度主義論歐洲議會職權之變遷」,碩士論文,中國文化大學中山學術研究所博士論文,民國90年。
陳麒安,「後冷戰時期美國聯盟外交之研究」,碩士論文,私立淡江大學國際事務與戰略研究所碩士論文,民國92年。
張鑑昇,「後冷戰時期北約角色轉變之研究」,碩士論文,國立中興大學國際政治研究所碩士論文,民國93年。
劉志鴻,「後冷戰時期歐洲安全機制演變與德國角色之研究」,碩士論文,私立淡江大學國際事務與戰略研究所碩士論文,民國90年。
戴慶正,「聯合國維持和平行動的變遷與發展-波士尼亞案例之研究」,國立政治大學外交學系戰略與國際事務碩士在職專班碩士論文,民國93年。
報紙
中國時報,民國90年10月9日,11版。
二、英文部分
專書
Arthur, W. Brian, Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994).
Della Porta, Donatella and Michael Keating edited, Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).
Dodd, C. Lawrence and Calvin C. Jillson edited, The Dynamics of American Politics (Boulder: Westview, 1994).
Durch, J. William, UN Peacekeeping, American Politics, and the Uncivil Wars of the 1990s (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1996).
Eckstein, Harry and David Apter edited, Comparative Politics (Glencoe, Free Press, 1963).
Evans, B. Peter, Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol, Bringing the State Back In (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985).
Gheciu, Alexandra, NATO in the New Europe (California: Stanford University Press, 2005).
Golden, R. James, Daniel J. Kaufman, Asa A. Clark IV, and David H. Petraeus edited, NATO at Forty (Boulder: Westview Press, 1989).
Gow, James, Legitimacy and the Military: the Yugoslav Crisis (New York: St.
Martin’s Press, 1992).
Krugman, Paul, Pop Internationalism (Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1996).
March, G. James, Johan P. Olsen, Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics (New York: The Free Press, 1989).
McDonald, J. Terrance edited, The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996).
Olson, Mancur, The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1965).
Peters, B. Guy, Institutional Theory in Political Science (New York: Pinter, 1999).
Schmalensee, Richard and Robert D. Willig edited, Handbook of industrial organization (New York: Elsevier Science, 1989).
Schmidt, Gustav edited, A History of NATO -The First Fifty Years (New York: Palgrave, 2001).
Sloan, R. Stanley, NATO in the 1990s (Washington: Pergamon-Brassey’s International Defense Publisher, 1989).
Soysal, N. Yasemin, Limits of Citizenship (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994).
Thelen, Kathleen and Fran Longstretch, Structuring Politics: Historical
Institutionalism in Comparative Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press,
1992).
Yost, S. David, NATO Transformed: The Alliance’s New Roles in International Security (Washington: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1998).
期刊論文
Art, J. Robert, “Why Western Europe Needs the United States and NATO,” Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 111, No. 1 (Spring 1996), pp. 1-39.
Arthur, W. Brian, “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events,” The Economic Journal, Vol. 99, No. 394 (March 1989), pp. 116-131.
Cornish, Paul, “European Security: The End of Architecture and the New NATO,” International Affairs , Vol. 72, No. 4 (October 1996), pp. 751-769.
Cragg, Anthony, “A New Strategic Concept for a New Era,” NATO Review, No. 2 (Summer 1999), pp. 19-22.
Croft, Stuart, Jolyon Howorth, Terry Terriff and Mark Webber, “NATO`s Triple Challenge,” International Affairs, Vol. 76, No. 3, Europe: Where Does It Begin and End? (July 2000), pp. 495-518.
Duffield, John S, “NATO’s Functions after the Cold War,” Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 109, No. 5 (Winter 1994-1995), pp. 763-787.
Glaser, L. Charles, “Why NATO is Still Best: Future Security Arrangements for Europe,” International Security, Vol. 18, No. 1 (Summer 1993), pp. 5-50.
Hall, A. Peter and Rosemary C. R. Taylor, “Political Science and the Three `New Institutionalisms,`” Political Studies, Vol. 44, Issue 4 (December 1996), pp. 935-957; also published in Karol Soltan et al., eds., Institutions and Social Order. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998), pp. 15-43.
Hellmann, Gunther and Reinhard Wolf, “Neorealism, Neoliberal institutionalism and the Future of the NATO,” Security Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1 (Autumn 1993), p. 17.
Immergut, M. Ellen, “The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism,” Politics and Society, Vol. 26, (1998), pp. 5-34.
Kay, Sean, “The `new NATO` and the enlargement process,” European Security, Vol. 6, No. 4 (Winter 1997), pp. 1-16.
Keohane, O. Robert and Lisa L. Martin, “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory,” International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1 (Summer 1995), pp. 39-51.
Koeble, A. Thomas, “The New Institutionalism in Political Science and Sociology,” Comparative Politics, Vol.27, (1995), pp. 231-245.
Krasner, D. Stephen, “Review: Approaches to the States: Alternative Conceptions and History Dynamics,” Comparative Politics, Vol. 16, No. 2 (January 1984), pp. 223-246.
Krugman, Paul, “History and Industry Location: The Case of the Manufacturing Belt,” American Economic Review, Vol. 81, No. 2 (May 1991), pp. 80-83.
Kydd, Andrew, “Trust Building, Trust Breaking: The Dilemma of NATO Enlargement,” International Organization, Vol. 55, No. 4, (Autumn 2001), pp. 801-828.
Levi, Margaret, “Theories of Historical and Institutional Change,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 20, No. 3 (Summer 1987), pp. 684-688.
Liebowitz, S. J. and Stephen E. Margolis, “Path Dependence, Lock-in, and History,” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, Vol. 11, No. 1 (April 1995), pp. 205-226.
Mahoney, James, “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology,” Theory and Society, Vol. 29, No. 4 (August 2000), pp. 507-548.
March, G. James and Johan P. Olson, “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 78, No. 3 (September 1984), pp. 734-749.
Mearsheimer, J. John, “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War,” International Security, Vol. 15, No. 1 (Summer 1990), pp. 5-56.
McCalla, B. Robert, “NATO’s Persistence after the Cold War,” International Organization, Vol. 50, No. 3 (Summer 1996), pp. 445-475.
Ness, D. Gayl and Steven R. Brechin, “Bridging the Gap: International Organizations as Organizations,” International Organization, Vol. 42, No. 2 (Spring 1988), pp. 245-273.
Peters, B. Guy, Jon Pierre and Desmond S. King, “The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism,” The Journal of Politics, Vol. 67, No. 4 (November 2005), pp. 1275-1300.
Pierson, Paul, “The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis,” Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 29, No. 2 (1996), pp. 123-163.
Pierson, Paul, “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence and the Study of Politics,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 94, No. 2 (June 2000), pp. 251-266.
de Nevers, Renée, “NATO’s International Security Role in the Terrorist Era,” International Security, Vol. 31, No. 4 (Spring, 2007), pp. 34-66.
Schimmelfennig, Frank, “Nato enlargement: A constructivist explanation,” Security Studies, Vol. 8, No. 2/3, Special Issue (Winter 1998/99~Spring 1999), pp. 198-234.
Sloan, R. Stanley, “NATO’s Future in a New Europe: An American Perspective,” International Affairs, Vol. 66, No. 3 (July 1990), pp. 495-511.
Sloan, R. Stanley, “US Perspectives on NATO`s Future,” International Affairs, Vol. 71, No. 2 (April 1995), pp. 217-231.
Thelen, Kathleen, “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics,” Annual Review, Vol. 2 (1999), pp. 369-404.
Wallander, A. Celeste, “NATO`s Price: Shape Up or Ship Out,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 81, No. 6 (1999), pp. 2-9.
Wallander, A. Celeste, “Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO after the Cold War,” International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 4 (Autumn 2000), pp. 705-735.
Walt, M. Stephen, “Testing Theories of Alliance Formation: the Case of Southwest Asia,” International Organization, Vol. 42, No.2 (Spring 1988), pp. 275-316.
Waltz, N. Kenneth, “The Emerging Structure of International Politics,” International Security, Vol. 18, No. 2 (Autumn 1993), pp. 44-79.
Wedgewood, Ruth, “NATO’s Campaign in Yugoslavia,” The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 93, No. 4 (October 1999), pp. 828-834.
Woodliffe, John, “The Evolution of a New NATO for a New Europe,” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 47, No. 1 (January 1998), pp. 174-192.
網路資料
北約組織官方網站:http://www.nato.int/docu/handbook/2001/index.htm
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
外交研究所
96253002
98
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096253002
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 姜家雄zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 莊景名zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chuang, Ching Mingen_US
dc.creator (作者) 莊景名zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chuang, Ching Mingen_US
dc.date (日期) 2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned 9-Apr-2010 09:56:52 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 9-Apr-2010 09:56:52 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 9-Apr-2010 09:56:52 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0096253002en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38516-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 外交研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96253002zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 98zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文研究的主要問題為北大西洋公約組織(North Atlantic Treaty Organization)於後冷戰時期的發展。由於北約組織在冷戰期間的主要功能為防止蘇聯與共產勢力在歐洲地區的擴張,因此於冷戰結束後,許多學者紛紛預測北約組織將會走向衰敗的道路。過去國際關係學界皆以傳統的國際關係理論來檢視北約組織的發展,儘管各家學說皆有其獨到之處,然而仍缺乏較具說服力的定論。而本文採用歷史制度主義(historical institutionalism)中的路徑依賴(path dependence)概念來探討此議題,並將發展的範圍限定於北約組織於後冷戰時期的延續以及轉型這兩個方面。路徑依賴下包含的兩個重要概念:「報酬遞增」 (increasing returns)以及「關鍵節點」 (critical juncture),則將分別用來解釋北約組織於後冷戰時期的延續與轉型。經過研究後證實,歷史制度主義的路徑依賴概念可以用來解釋北約組織於後冷戰時期的延續與轉型,但此種分析途徑仍需要對組織的發展歷史掌握得更加詳細明確,才得以在論證組織的發展演變時,更具說服力。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 導論 .......................................................1

第一節 研究動機與研究目的..........................................1
第二節 文獻探討....................................................3
第三節 研究範圍與研究限制..........................................7
第四節 研究方法與論文架構..........................................9

第二章 歷史制度主義理論架構.......................................12

第一節 新制度主義.................................................12
第二節 歷史制度主義...............................................18
第三節 歷史制度主義的重要概念.....................................26
第四節 歷史制度主義作為北約組織研究的抉擇.........................33

第三章 北大西洋公約組織的歷史分析.................................42

第一節 北約組織的成立背景與宗旨...................................42
第二節 北約組織的架構與任務.......................................47
第三節 北約組織於冷戰期間的角色與發展.............................54
第四節 北約組織於冷戰後的角色轉變.................................58

第四章 路徑依賴與後冷戰的北約組織.................................68

第一節 報酬遞增與北約組織的延續...................................69
第二節 關鍵節點與北約組織的轉型...................................78
第三節 路徑依賴與北約組織發展.....................................93

第五章 結論.......................................................99

參考書目..........................................................105






表 目錄
表3-1 .............................................................55

圖 目錄
圖3-1 .............................................................48
圖3-2 .............................................................51
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 441107 bytes-
dc.format.extent 6627949 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096253002en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 北約組織zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 歷史制度主義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 路徑依賴zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 報酬遞增zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 關鍵節點zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 波士尼亞戰爭zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 後冷戰zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 從路徑依賴探討後冷戰時期的北約組織發展zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Path dependence and NATO after the Cold Waren_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 專書zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 史蒂芬.布蘭克(Stephen J. Blank)編,馮國震、楊紫函譯,擴張後的北約:新挑戰、新任務、新部隊(臺北:史政編譯局,民88年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 邱恩田,北約:從冷戰到熱戰(北京:新華出版社,1999年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許智偉編,鈕先鍾翻譯,華沙公約組織(臺北:黎明文化,民75年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 翁明賢、林德澔、陳聰銘著,歐洲區域組織新論(臺北:五南圖書,1994年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 宋燕輝、焦興鎧主編,聯合國與歐美國家論文集(臺北:中央研究院歐美研究所,1997年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 亞倫.包爾(Alan R. Ball)、蓋.彼得斯(Guy B. Peters)著,陳一新、鄧毓浩、陳景堯譯校,最新現代政治與政府(臺北:韋伯文化,民92)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 道格拉斯.諾斯(Douglas North)著,劉瑞華譯,制度制度變遷與經濟成就(臺北:時報文化,1994年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 渠梁、韓德主編,國際組織與集團研究(北京:中國社會科學出版社,1989年11月)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 葉至誠、葉立誠着,研究方法與論文寫作(臺北:商鼎文化,1999年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 錢武南、楊連仲譯,北約擴張與歐洲情勢譯文彙輯(臺北:國防部軍務局,民87年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 聯合國社會發展研究所,蔡慶年、沈浦娜譯,全球化背景下的社會問題(北京:北京大學出版社,1997年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 期刊論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 甘逸驊,「北約東擴-軍事聯盟的變遷與政治意涵」,問題與研究,第42卷第4期(民國92年7、8月),頁1-24。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 甘逸驊,「冷戰結束後的北約與國際關係理論」,問題與研究,第42卷第5期(民國92年9、10月),頁1-24。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李大中,「北約之轉型:德國與大西洋兩岸秩序的重建」,問題與研究,第35卷第3期(民國85年3月),頁65-80。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡婉玲,「論歷史制度主義的制度變遷理論」,新世紀智庫論壇,第16期(2001年12月),頁86¬-95。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 徐坤明,「波黑背後的大國明爭暗鬥」,時事報告, 第3期(1994年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 湯紹成,「後冷戰時期北大西洋公約組織角色與功能的轉變」,問題與研究,第39卷第1期(民國89年1月),頁67-78。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊淑珩,「歐、美、俄在波黑的角逐」,和平與發展,第3期(1994年),頁30。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 彭慧鶯,「戰後美國外援法案的決策運作」,問題與研究,第31卷第1zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 期(民國80年1月),頁63-72。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 翟雲瑞,「南斯拉夫民族間內戰的由來和發展」,東歐中亞研究,第3期(1995年),頁57-61。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 盧倩儀,「區域整合理論的比較與分析」,美歐季刊,第12卷第1期(1997年春季刊號),頁27-44。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 博碩士學位論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳欣蓉,「歐盟安全自主發展與北約組織關係之研究(1990-2003)」,碩士論文,私立淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士論文,民國92年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡婉玲,「從新制度主義論歐洲議會職權之變遷」,碩士論文,中國文化大學中山學術研究所博士論文,民國90年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳麒安,「後冷戰時期美國聯盟外交之研究」,碩士論文,私立淡江大學國際事務與戰略研究所碩士論文,民國92年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張鑑昇,「後冷戰時期北約角色轉變之研究」,碩士論文,國立中興大學國際政治研究所碩士論文,民國93年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉志鴻,「後冷戰時期歐洲安全機制演變與德國角色之研究」,碩士論文,私立淡江大學國際事務與戰略研究所碩士論文,民國90年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 戴慶正,「聯合國維持和平行動的變遷與發展-波士尼亞案例之研究」,國立政治大學外交學系戰略與國際事務碩士在職專班碩士論文,民國93年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 報紙zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中國時報,民國90年10月9日,11版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 專書zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Arthur, W. Brian, Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Della Porta, Donatella and Michael Keating edited, Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dodd, C. Lawrence and Calvin C. Jillson edited, The Dynamics of American Politics (Boulder: Westview, 1994).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Durch, J. William, UN Peacekeeping, American Politics, and the Uncivil Wars of the 1990s (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1996).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Eckstein, Harry and David Apter edited, Comparative Politics (Glencoe, Free Press, 1963).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Evans, B. Peter, Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol, Bringing the State Back In (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gheciu, Alexandra, NATO in the New Europe (California: Stanford University Press, 2005).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Golden, R. James, Daniel J. Kaufman, Asa A. Clark IV, and David H. Petraeus edited, NATO at Forty (Boulder: Westview Press, 1989).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gow, James, Legitimacy and the Military: the Yugoslav Crisis (New York: St.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Martin’s Press, 1992).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Krugman, Paul, Pop Internationalism (Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1996).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) March, G. James, Johan P. Olsen, Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics (New York: The Free Press, 1989).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McDonald, J. Terrance edited, The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Olson, Mancur, The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1965).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Peters, B. Guy, Institutional Theory in Political Science (New York: Pinter, 1999).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schmalensee, Richard and Robert D. Willig edited, Handbook of industrial organization (New York: Elsevier Science, 1989).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schmidt, Gustav edited, A History of NATO -The First Fifty Years (New York: Palgrave, 2001).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sloan, R. Stanley, NATO in the 1990s (Washington: Pergamon-Brassey’s International Defense Publisher, 1989).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Soysal, N. Yasemin, Limits of Citizenship (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Thelen, Kathleen and Fran Longstretch, Structuring Politics: Historicalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Institutionalism in Comparative Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1992).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yost, S. David, NATO Transformed: The Alliance’s New Roles in International Security (Washington: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1998).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 期刊論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Art, J. Robert, “Why Western Europe Needs the United States and NATO,” Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 111, No. 1 (Spring 1996), pp. 1-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Arthur, W. Brian, “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events,” The Economic Journal, Vol. 99, No. 394 (March 1989), pp. 116-131.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cornish, Paul, “European Security: The End of Architecture and the New NATO,” International Affairs , Vol. 72, No. 4 (October 1996), pp. 751-769.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cragg, Anthony, “A New Strategic Concept for a New Era,” NATO Review, No. 2 (Summer 1999), pp. 19-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Croft, Stuart, Jolyon Howorth, Terry Terriff and Mark Webber, “NATO`s Triple Challenge,” International Affairs, Vol. 76, No. 3, Europe: Where Does It Begin and End? (July 2000), pp. 495-518.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Duffield, John S, “NATO’s Functions after the Cold War,” Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 109, No. 5 (Winter 1994-1995), pp. 763-787.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Glaser, L. Charles, “Why NATO is Still Best: Future Security Arrangements for Europe,” International Security, Vol. 18, No. 1 (Summer 1993), pp. 5-50.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hall, A. Peter and Rosemary C. R. Taylor, “Political Science and the Three `New Institutionalisms,`” Political Studies, Vol. 44, Issue 4 (December 1996), pp. 935-957; also published in Karol Soltan et al., eds., Institutions and Social Order. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998), pp. 15-43.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hellmann, Gunther and Reinhard Wolf, “Neorealism, Neoliberal institutionalism and the Future of the NATO,” Security Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1 (Autumn 1993), p. 17.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Immergut, M. Ellen, “The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism,” Politics and Society, Vol. 26, (1998), pp. 5-34.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kay, Sean, “The `new NATO` and the enlargement process,” European Security, Vol. 6, No. 4 (Winter 1997), pp. 1-16.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keohane, O. Robert and Lisa L. Martin, “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory,” International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1 (Summer 1995), pp. 39-51.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Koeble, A. Thomas, “The New Institutionalism in Political Science and Sociology,” Comparative Politics, Vol.27, (1995), pp. 231-245.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Krasner, D. Stephen, “Review: Approaches to the States: Alternative Conceptions and History Dynamics,” Comparative Politics, Vol. 16, No. 2 (January 1984), pp. 223-246.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Krugman, Paul, “History and Industry Location: The Case of the Manufacturing Belt,” American Economic Review, Vol. 81, No. 2 (May 1991), pp. 80-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kydd, Andrew, “Trust Building, Trust Breaking: The Dilemma of NATO Enlargement,” International Organization, Vol. 55, No. 4, (Autumn 2001), pp. 801-828.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Levi, Margaret, “Theories of Historical and Institutional Change,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 20, No. 3 (Summer 1987), pp. 684-688.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Liebowitz, S. J. and Stephen E. Margolis, “Path Dependence, Lock-in, and History,” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, Vol. 11, No. 1 (April 1995), pp. 205-226.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mahoney, James, “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology,” Theory and Society, Vol. 29, No. 4 (August 2000), pp. 507-548.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) March, G. James and Johan P. Olson, “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 78, No. 3 (September 1984), pp. 734-749.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mearsheimer, J. John, “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War,” International Security, Vol. 15, No. 1 (Summer 1990), pp. 5-56.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McCalla, B. Robert, “NATO’s Persistence after the Cold War,” International Organization, Vol. 50, No. 3 (Summer 1996), pp. 445-475.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ness, D. Gayl and Steven R. Brechin, “Bridging the Gap: International Organizations as Organizations,” International Organization, Vol. 42, No. 2 (Spring 1988), pp. 245-273.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Peters, B. Guy, Jon Pierre and Desmond S. King, “The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism,” The Journal of Politics, Vol. 67, No. 4 (November 2005), pp. 1275-1300.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pierson, Paul, “The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis,” Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 29, No. 2 (1996), pp. 123-163.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pierson, Paul, “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence and the Study of Politics,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 94, No. 2 (June 2000), pp. 251-266.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) de Nevers, Renée, “NATO’s International Security Role in the Terrorist Era,” International Security, Vol. 31, No. 4 (Spring, 2007), pp. 34-66.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schimmelfennig, Frank, “Nato enlargement: A constructivist explanation,” Security Studies, Vol. 8, No. 2/3, Special Issue (Winter 1998/99~Spring 1999), pp. 198-234.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sloan, R. Stanley, “NATO’s Future in a New Europe: An American Perspective,” International Affairs, Vol. 66, No. 3 (July 1990), pp. 495-511.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sloan, R. Stanley, “US Perspectives on NATO`s Future,” International Affairs, Vol. 71, No. 2 (April 1995), pp. 217-231.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Thelen, Kathleen, “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics,” Annual Review, Vol. 2 (1999), pp. 369-404.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wallander, A. Celeste, “NATO`s Price: Shape Up or Ship Out,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 81, No. 6 (1999), pp. 2-9.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wallander, A. Celeste, “Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO after the Cold War,” International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 4 (Autumn 2000), pp. 705-735.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Walt, M. Stephen, “Testing Theories of Alliance Formation: the Case of Southwest Asia,” International Organization, Vol. 42, No.2 (Spring 1988), pp. 275-316.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Waltz, N. Kenneth, “The Emerging Structure of International Politics,” International Security, Vol. 18, No. 2 (Autumn 1993), pp. 44-79.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wedgewood, Ruth, “NATO’s Campaign in Yugoslavia,” The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 93, No. 4 (October 1999), pp. 828-834.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Woodliffe, John, “The Evolution of a New NATO for a New Europe,” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 47, No. 1 (January 1998), pp. 174-192.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 網路資料zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 北約組織官方網站:http://www.nato.int/docu/handbook/2001/index.htmzh_TW