| dc.contributor.advisor | 胡錦媛 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Hu, Chin-yuan | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 李筱釩 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Lee, Hsiao Fen | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 李筱釩 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Lee, Hsiao Fen | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2009 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 9-Apr-2010 15:43:42 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 9-Apr-2010 15:43:42 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 9-Apr-2010 15:43:42 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0955510021 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38749 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 英國語文學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 95551002 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 98 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 數世紀以來，《威尼斯商人》(The Merchant of Venice, 1596-1598)的批評總聚焦在「猶太人問題」(the Jewish question) 與「女人問題」(the woman question) 上：劇中放高利貸的夏洛 (Shylock) 體現了猶太人的原型，而富有、機智的波黠 (Portia) 則是強勢女性的代表。然而，這種閱讀方式將兩個問題分開處理，忽略了兩者在劇中密切的關聯，僅只以審判一景聯繫兩個角色所代表的問題。 本論文嘗試以「禮物交換」(gift exchange) 重新閱讀《威尼斯商人》。牟斯 (Marcel Mauss) 的著作《禮物》(The Gift, 1925) 初步定義原始社會中的交換行為與其涵意，奠定了禮物研究的基礎。禮物交換所建構的社會關係複雜多變，因此，除牟斯外，本論文亦援引佳寶 (Jacques T. Godbout) 與楊 (Iris Marion Young) 的理論，以期透視《威尼斯商人》中的角色在禮物交換之下的互動與劇情發展。 根據喜福特 (Alan D. Schrift) 所言，禮物描繪了「主體間的互動」(intersubjective interaction)。立基於此概念，並以上述等人的理論為架構，本論文由三個面向逐步探討《威尼斯商人》中基督男性的「自我」(self) 與猶太／女性「他者」(other) 間的禮物交換：（一）禮物交換的基礎；（二）禮物交換的聯繫與風險；（三）非對稱交換關係與重建關係。劇中安東尼 (Antonio) 與巴薩紐 (Bassanio) 的友情為禮物交換的基礎，進一步展現禮物特色，牽連／牽絆夏洛與波黠，發揮禮物效應，帶出多重「非對稱」(asymmetry) 的要素，終致重建四人的關係。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | For centuries, the Jewish question and the woman question have always been the salient concerns for criticisms of The Merchant of Venice (1596-1598): whereas Shylock the usurer embodies a Jewish archetype, Portia the clever heiress presents a powerful female figure. Nevertheless, treating the Jewish question and the woman question separately, this kind of reading ignores the close relationship between the two in the play, and connects them loosely only with the trial scene. This thesis reads The Merchant of Venice in the perspective of gift exchange. Founding the studies of the gift, Marcel Mauss’s The Gift (1925) firstly defines the reciprocity and the significance of gift exchange in archaic societies. Since social relationship established by gift exchange is subject to change, this thesis also draws on Jacques T. Godbout’s and Iris Marion Young’s theories to probe into the interaction of characters and the movement of The Merchant of Venice. According to Alan D. Schrift, the gift depicts “intersubjective interaction” (18). Based on this concept and structured with the above theories, the thesis examines gift exchange between the Christian male “self” and its Jewish/female other in The Merchant of Venice step by step in three dimensions: (1) the basis of gift exchange; (2) bond and risk in gift exchange; (3) asymmetrical reciprocity and reestablished relation. In the play, gift exchange brings its effect of bond and feature of asymmetry into full play. Grounded on the friendship between Antonio and Bassanio, gift exchange links/restrains Shylock and Portia, and reestablishes the characters’ relationships as a result. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgements……………3 Chinese Abstract……………5 English Abstract……………6 Chapter One: Introduction: Why Gift Exchange……………7 I. Literature Review……………8 II. Theoretical Approaches……………12 III. Chapter Organization……………17 Chapter Two: The Basis of Gift Exchange……………21 I. Friendship and Gift Exchange……………22 II. Gift Exchange within Christians Excluding the Jew……………30 III. Gift Exchange between Men Mediated by Women……………37 Chapter Three: Bond and Risk in Gift Exchange……………45 I. The Double Bond of the Gift……………46 II. The Bond among Shylock, Antonio and Bassanio……………53 III. The Bond among Portia, Antonio and Bassanio……………61 Chapter Four: Asymmetrical Reciprocity and Reestablished Relation……………71 I. Asymmetries between Antonio and Shylock……………73 II. Asymmetries among Portia, Antonio and Bassanio……………82 III. Remaining Debts and Reestablished Relations……………90 Chapter Five: The Possibility of Reconciliation……………101 I. Beyond the Gift, the Giver and the Receiver……………101 II. Beyond Giving, Receiving and Reciprocating……………104 III. Beyond Gift and Exchange……………106 Works Cited……………109 | zh_TW |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0955510021 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 禮物交換 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 威尼斯商人 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 非對稱交換關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 友誼 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | gift exchange | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | The Merchant of Venice | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | asymmetrical reciprocity | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | friendship | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 《威尼斯商人》中的禮物交換 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Gift Exchange in The Merchant of Venice | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Aristotle. The Ethics of Aristotle. Trans. D. P. Chase. New York: Dutton, 1950. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Barton, Anne. “The Merchant of Venice.” The Riverside Shakespeare. Ed. G. Blakemore Evans and J. J. Tobin. Boston: Houghton, 1997. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bataille, Georges. Consumption. New York: Zone, 1988. Vol. 1 of The Accursed Share: An Essay on General Economy. 3 vols. 1988-93. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | “Bond.” Def. Encarta® World English Dictionary. North American Ed. Microsoft, 2009 <http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/dictionary/DictionaryResults. aspx?lextype=3&search=bond> | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Trans. Richard Nice. London: Routledge, 1986. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ---. “Marginalia—Some Additional Notes on the Gift.” The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity. Ed. Alan D. Schrift. Routledge: Routledge, 1997. 231-41. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ---. “Selections from The Logic of Practice.” The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity. Ed. Alan D. Schrift. Routledge: Routledge, 1997. 190-230. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brown, John Russell. Introduction. The Merchant of Venice. By William Shakespeare. London: Methuen, 1955. xi-lviii. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Caputo, John D. Deconstruction in a Nutshell: A Conversation with Jacques Derrida. New York: Fordham University Press, 1997. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Derrida, Jacques. The Gift of Death. Trans. David Wills. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ---. Given Time: I. Counterfeit Money. Trans. Peggy Kamuf. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ---. “The Politics of Friendship.” Journal of Philosophy 85.11 (1988): 632-44. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Emerson, Ralph Waldo. “Gifts.” The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity. Ed. Alan D. Schrift. Routledge: Routledge, 1997. 25-27. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Engle, Lars. “‘Thrift Is Blessing’: Exchange and Explanation in The Merchant of Venice.” Shakespeare Quarterly 37.1 (1986): 20-37. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Godbout, Jacques T. “The Moral of the Gift.” Journal of Socio-Economics 27.4 (1998): 557-70. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ---, and Alain Caillé. The World of the Gift. Trans. Donald Winkler. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1998. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Halio, Jay L. General Introduction. The Merchant of Venice. By William Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hammond, Paul. Love between Men in English Literature. Houndmills: Macmillan, 1996. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hunter, G. K. “English Folly and Italian Vice: The Moral Landscape of John Marston.” Jacobean Theatre. Eds. John Russell Brown and Bernard Harris. London: Arnold, 1960. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Komter, Aafke E. Social Solidarity and the Gift. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | La Caze, Marguerite. “Seeing Oneself through the Eyes of the Other: Asymmetrical Reciprocity and Self-respect.” Hypatia 23.3 (2008): 118-35. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lampert, Lisa. Gender and Jewish Difference from Paul to Shakespeare. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Boston: Beacon, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1969. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lewalski, Barbara K. “Biblical Allusion and Allegory in The Merchant of Venice.” Shakespeare Quarterly 13.3 (1962): 327-43. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lucy, Niall. A Derrida Dictionary. Malden: Blackwell, 2004. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mauss, Marcel. “Gift, Gift.” The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity. Ed. Alan D. Schrift. Routledge: Routledge, 1997. 28-32. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ---. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. Trans. W. D. Halls. London: Routledge, 1990. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McLean, Susan. “Prodigal Sons and Daughters: Transgression and Forgiveness in The Merchant of Venice.” Papers on Language and Literature 32.1 (1996): 45-62. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Newman, Karen. “Portia’s Ring: Unruly Women and Structures of Exchange in The Merchant of Venice.” Shakespeare Quarterly 38.1 (1987): 19-33. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Roberts, Sarah Elizabeth. “Rethinking Justice with Kierkegaard, Levinas, and Derrida.” Diss. Purdue University, 2000. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rubin, Gayle. “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex.” Women, Culture, and Society. Eds. Michelle Zimbalist Rosaldo and Louise Lamphere. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1974. 157-210. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Schrift, Alan D. “Introduction: Why Gift?” The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity. Routledge: Routledge, 1997. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York: Columbia University Press, 1985. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Shakespeare, William. The Merchant of Venice. Ed. Jay L. Halio. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Shapiro, James. Shakespeare and the Jews. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sharp, Ronald A. “Gift Exchange and the Economies of Spirit in The Merchant of Venice.” Modern Philology 83 (1986): 250-65. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tennenhouse, Leonard. “The Counterfeit Order of The Merchant of Venice.” Representing Shakespeare: New Psychoanalytic Essays. Eds. Murray M. Schwartz and Coppelia Kahn. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Thompson, Bruce Allen. “The Archaic Present: The Social Thought of Marcel Mauss and His Successors.” Diss. Stanford University, 1987. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Weiner, Annette. Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Young, Iris Marion. Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997. | zh_TW |
