學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 臺灣英語教學碩士論文中文獻探討章節之語步分析
Move structure of literature review in Ma theses by Taiwanese TEFL Graduates
作者 蕭政華
Hsiao, Cheng Hua
貢獻者 尤雪瑛
Yu, Hsueh Ying
蕭政華
Hsiao, Cheng Hua
關鍵詞 文獻回顧
語步結構
學術論文寫作
學術英文
Literature Review
Move Structure
Thesis Writing
Academic Writing
日期 2010
上傳時間 8-Dec-2010 01:49:29 (UTC+8)
摘要 在學術論文寫作眾多章節中,文獻回顧章節是讀寫過程中困難度較高的一章節,因此研究生普遍視為畏途。文獻回顧的語步分析在過去文獻中尚未受到重視。因此本論文旨在分析臺灣英語教學碩士論文中文獻回顧章節之語步結構。本論文提出兩個研究問題: (1)臺灣英語教學碩士論文文獻回顧章節之語步結構為何?(2)評選高分與評選低分的文獻回顧差異為何?本論文選出三十篇臺灣英語教學碩士論文中文獻回顧章節做為文本分析並將其評選高分群與評選低分群。本研究以四個主要語步來分析文獻回顧章節的語步結構。這四個主要語步分別為:(1)領域知識觀念介紹,(2)用主題方式整合過去之文獻,(3)聯結過去文獻與將進行之研究之關係,及(4)宣布將進行研究。每一主要語步都有數個次要語步。本論文討論語步出現的頻率,語步發展,語步組合結構及語步循環。
     本論文顯示第一語步使用的最為廣泛佔56.96%,第二語步佔22.39%,第三語步與第四語步各為11.74%與8.91%。收集之文獻回顧分為四組,分別為(1)表現最差,(2)表現較差,(3)表現稱職,及(4)表現最好。 結果發現表現最差的一組沒有任何主題發展,表現較差的一組有主題發展但是僅限於整合,表現稱職的一組有運用到四個主要語步,而表現最好的一組發現有數個全部語步的循環。本論文呈現臺灣英語教學碩士論文文獻回顧章節的語步結構。這些結果與討論提供英語教學領域研究生更加了解學術論文文獻回顧之寫作架構。
Reviewing literature for a research study is a highly complicated reading and writing process, which has been assumed a rather formidable task for many graduate students. In the field of English for Specific Purposes, many scholars have devoted their studies into certain types of genre analysis, particularly research genres. However, the concept of “literature review” (LR) as a distinct type of genre has been constantly overlooked and the move structure of literature reviews unexplored.
     The move structure of LRs in master theses written by Taiwanese TEFL program graduates was studied. This proposed study included two research questions: (1) What are the move structures of the LR chapters in the master theses of TEFL programs? (2) Do the move structures differ between the low-rated and high-rated LRs? In this study, thirty theses were randomly chosen. Thirty theses were rated and grouped into high-rated and low-rated categories. Based on Kwan’s framework (2006) and the results of pilot study, a new move structure with the four major moves was formulated for this study.
     The statistical results showed that “conceptualizing themes in a field (Move 1)” takes the largest proportion among the total occurrences, followed by “integrating previous works on the themes (Move 2),” “relating previous works to the current study (Move 3)” and “advancing to one’s own study (Move 4).” It is concluded that LRs composed by these graduates fundamentally serves to present relevant field knowledge. Further, no topic expansion is found in the deficient group. Most of the LRs in the poor group halt at the synthesis though there is some topic development. The competent group has a complete occurrence of the four major moves. Multiple cycles are found per LR in the distinctive group. This study provides insights into the move structure of Taiwanese students’ literature review chapters of master theses.
參考文獻 Anthony, L. (1999). Writing research article introductions in software engineering: How accurate is a standard model? IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42, 38-46.
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Barber C. (1962). Some measurable characteristics of modern scientific prose. In Contribution to English ‘syntax and philology. Reprinted in J.M. Swales (Ed.) Episodes in ESP. 1988. Hermel Hempstead: Prentice Hall International.
Bardov-Harlig, K., & Bofman, T. (1989). Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 17-34.
Bazerman,C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
Belcher, D. (2004). Trends in teaching English for specific purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 154-186.
Berkenkotter, G., & Huckin, T. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bhatia, V.K. (1993). Analyzing genre: language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
Bitchener J. & Basturkmen H. (2006).Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 4-19.
Bloom, B., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, F.J., Hill, W.H., & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: cognitive domain . New York: McKay.
Swales, J. (1981). Aspects of article introductions. Birmingham, UK: LSU, University of Aston.
Swales, J.M.(1990). Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J.M., & Feak C.B. (2000). English in today’s research world: A writing guide. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Swales J.M., & Lindemann, S. (2002). Teaching the literature review to international graduate students. In A. Johns (Ed.), Genres and the classroom- multiple perspectives (pp. 105-119). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Swales, J., & Najjar, H. (1987). The writing of research article introductions. Written Communication, 4(2), 175-191.
Tarone, E., Dwyer S., Gillette S., & Icke V. (1981). On the use of the passive in two astrophysics journal papers. ESP Journal, 1(2), 123-140.
Thompson (2005). Points of focus and position: Intertextual reference in PhD theses. Journal of English for Academic Purpose, 4, 307-323.
Thompson, P., & Tribble C. (2001) Looing at citations: using corpora in English for academic purposes. Language, Learning and Technology, 5(3) 91-105.
Trimble L. (1985). English for science and technology: a discourse approach. UK: Cambridge Press.
Tsai, Y. C. (2006). Effects of online academic English materials on graduate students’ writing: introductions in research articles of the applied linguistic disciplines. Unpublished Master Thesis. National Ching Hua University.
Bock, J. & Irwin, D. (1980). Syntactic effects of information availability in sentence production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 467-484.
Ward, G., & Birner, B. (2001). Discourse and information structure. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H.E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 119-137). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Weissberg, R. & Buker, S. (1990). Writing up research: Experimental research report writing for students of English. NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
Wilhelm, W.J., & Kaunelis, D. (2005). Literature reviews: analysis, planning, and query techniques. The DTEFLa Pi Epsilon Journal, 47(2), 91-106.
Williams, P. (1999). Result sections of medical research articles; analysis of rhetorical categories for pedagogical purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 347-366.
Yang, R. & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 365-385.
劉賢軒. (1999). <英文學術期刊論文中的解釋過程>。《第十六屆中華民國英語文教學國際研討會論文集》,頁375-384,台北市: 文鶴出版有限公司。
劉賢軒. (2001). <學術期刊論文中的情態表達: 台灣博士生的「謹言慎行」>。《第十八屆中華民國英語文教學國際研討會論文集》,頁375-384,台北市: 文鶴出版有限公司。
劉賢軒. (2003a). <章類分析與學術英文教學: 台灣博士生的摘要改進問題>,《英語教學》,第二十七卷第四期,頁65-77,國立台灣師範大學。
Boote, D.N. & Beile, P. (2005) Scholars before researchers: on the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34 (6), 3-15.
Borg, W.R., & Gall, M.D. (1989). Educational research: an introduction (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
Brett.P. (1994). A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13 (1), 47-59.
Brown G. & Yule G. (1983). Discourse analysis. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bunton, D. (1999) The use of higher level metatext in Ph.D. theses. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 41-56.
Bunton, D. (2005). The structure of PhD conclusion chapters. Journal of English for Academic Purpose. 4, 207- 224.
Chafe, W. (1979). The flow of thought and the flow of langauge. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 12. Discourse and syntax (p. 159-181). New York: Academic Press.
Cheng A. (2007). Understanding learners and learning in ESP genre-based writing instruction. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 76-89.
Chiu, R. (1972). Measuring register characteristics: a prerequisite for preparing advanced level TESOL programs. TESOL Quarterly, 6(2), 129-141.
Christie F. (1999). Genre theory and ESL teaching: a systemic functional perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 33(4), 759-763.
Cooley, L., & Lewkowicz, J. (1995). The writing needs of graduate students’ at the University of Hong Kong: A project report. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 18, 121-123.
Crookes, G.. (1986) Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure. Applied Linguistics, 7, 57-70.
Crystal D., & Davy D. (1969). Investigating English style. IN: Indiana: University Press.
Daiker, D., Kerek, A.,& Morenberg, M. (1986). The writer’s options: combining to composing. New York: Harper & Row.
Dong Y. (1998). Non-native graduate students’ thesis/dissertation writing in science: self-reports by students and their advisors from two U.S. institutions. English for Specific Purposes, 17(4), 369-390.
Dudley-Evans, T. (1986). Genre analysis: An investigation of the introduction and discussion sections of MSc dissertations. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Talking about text (pp. 128-145). Birmingham: English Language Research, University of Birmingham.
Ellis J., & Ure J. (1969). Language varieties: register. In R. Meacham. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of linguistics: information and control, 251-250. London: Pergamon.
Feng, H.P. (2005). A process-product approach of teaching academic writing: ssing the teaching of writing a literature review as an example. Paper presented in the 22nd international conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China. June 4-5. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.
Flowerdew. J. (2002). Academic discourse. London: Pearson.
Froese, A.D, Gantz, B.S., and Henry, A.L. (1998). Teaching students to write literature reviews: a meta-analytic model. Teaching of Psychology, 25 (2), 102-105.
Givon, T. (1983). Topic continuation in discourse: The functional domain of switch reference. In J. Haiman & P. Munro (Eds.), Switch-reference and universal grammar (p. 51-82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givon, T. (1987). Beyond foreground and background. In R.S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (p. 175-188). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gledhill, C. (2000). The discourse function of collocation in research article introduction. English for Specific Purposes, 19, 115-135.
Gosden H. (1995). Success in research article writing and revision: a social-constructionist perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 14(1), 37-57.
Granello, D. H. (2001). Promoting cognitive complexity in graduate written work: Using bloom’s taxonomy as a pedagogical tool to improve literature reviews. Counselor Education and Supervision, 40 (4), 292-307.
Graney, J. (1992). A framework for text graphing. System. 20 (2). 161-167.
Gregory, M., & Carroll. S. (1978).Language and situation: language varieties and their social contexts. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Gustafsson, M. (1975). Some syntactic properties of English law language. Publications of the Department of English. University of Turku.
Halliday, M., & Hasan R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Halliday, M., & Hasan. R. (1989). Language, context and text: aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. (1976). Theme and information in the English Clause. In G.R. Kress (Ed.), System and function in language (p. 174-188). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M., McIntosh, A., & Strevens, P. (1964). The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.
Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review. London: Sage publications Ltd.
Hewings M, 1993. The end! How to conclude a dissertation. In G M Blue (Ed.) Language, Learning and Success: studying through English, Developments in TEFL. Hemel Hempstead: Phoenix TEFL.
Hill, T. (1958). Institutional linguistics. Orbis, 7, 441-445.
Hill. S., Soppelsa B., & West G. (1982). Teaching ESL students to read and write experimental-research papers. TESOL Quarterly, 16(3), 333-347.
Hopkins, A., & Dudley –Evans, T.(1988). A genre-based investigation of the discussion section in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7, 113-122.
Hopper, P. (1979). Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In T. Givon (Ed.), Discourse and syntax (p. 213-241). New York: Academic Press.
Hugh, A. (2003). Teaching for language teachers. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (2004). Graduates’ gratitude: the generic structure of dissertation acknowledgements. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 303-324.
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: an ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30(4), 693-722.
Jenkins. S., Jordan, M., & Weiland, P. (1993). The role of writing in graduate engineering education: a survey of faculty beliefs and practices. English for Specific Purposes, 12, 51¬-67.
Johns A., & J. Swales (2002). Literacy and disciplinary practices: opening and closing perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1, 13-28.
Johns A. (1991). English for specific purposes (ESP): its history and contributions. In Celce-Murcia. (Ed.) Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston, Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Johns, A. (2003). Genre and ESL/EFL composition instruction. In B. Kroll, (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing. (p. 195-217). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kuno, S. (1980). Functional syntax. In E.A. Moravcski & J.R. Wirth (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 13. Current approaches to syntax (p. 117-135). New York: Academic Press)
Kuo, C. (1999). The use of personal pronouns: role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 121-138.
Kuo, C. (2001). Academic Competence: Designing an EAP Course for Ph.D. Students. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China.
Kuo, C. (2002). Phraseology in Scientific Research Articles. Selected Papers from the Eleventh International Symposium on English Teaching/ Fourth Pan-Asian Conference.
Lau, H. (2003b). The structure of academic journal abstracts written by Taiwanese PhD students. Taiwan Journal of TESOL. Taipei: National Chengchi University.
Kwan, B. (2006). The Schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 25 (1), 30-55.
Lackstrom J., Selinker L., & Trimble. L. (1973). Technical rhetorical principles and grammatical choice. TESOL Quarterly, 7(2), 127-136.
Lather, P. (1999). To be of use: the work of reviewing. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 2-7.
Lau, H. (2000). Interaction markers used by Taiwanese PhD students of physics. Selected Papers from the 13th International Symposium on English Teaching and Learning. 158-165.
Lim, J. (2006). Method sections of management research articles: a pedagogically motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes, 25 (3), 282-309.
Liu, P. C. (2007). Learning how to write a good MA thesis literature review: a case study of one Taiwanese graduate student. Yuan Chih University, Unpubished master thesis.
Lores R. (2004). On RA abstracts: from rhetorical structure to thematic organization. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 280-302.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Martin, J. (1985). Process and text: two aspects of human semiosis. In J. Benson and W. Greaves (Eds.): Systemic perspective on discourse. (pp. 248-274). Norwood NJ: Ablex.
Martin, J. (1992). English text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
McCarthy M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. UK: Cambridge University Press.
McNabb R. (2001). Making the gesture: graduate student submissions and the expectation of journal referees. Composition Studies, 29(1), 9-26.
Miller C.R.(1994). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167.
Moravcsik M., & Murugesan P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of Citation. Social Studies of Science, 5, 86-92.
Nwogu, K.(1997). The medical research paper: structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119-138.
Paltridge B. (1994). Genre analysis and the identification of textual boundaries, Applied Linguistics, 15, 288-299.
Paltridge, B. (2004). Academic writing. Language Teaching, 37, 87-105.
Peacock, M. ( 2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30, 479-497.
Petric B. (2007). Rhetorical functions of citations in high- and low-rated master’s theses. English for Specific Purposes, 6(3), 238-256.
Posteguillo, S. (1999). The semantic structure of computer science research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 139-160.
Prince, E. (1978). A comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts in discourse. Language, 54, 83-96.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Reid. T. (1956). Linguistics, structuralism and philology. Archivum Linguisticicum, 8 (1), 21-37.
Richards, R. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ruiying, Y., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: structures from a functional perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 264-279.
Samraj, B. (2002). Introduction in research articles: variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1), 1-17.
Santos, M. (1996) The textual organization of research paper abstract in applied linguistics. Text, 16, 481-499.
Saville-Troike, M. (1982). The ethnography of communication. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Scott, W. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: the case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 17, 321-325.
Selinker L., Trimble M., & Trimble L. (1978). Rhetorical function- shift in EST discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 12(3), 311-320.
Selinker L., Trimble R.,& Trimble L. (1976). presuppositional rhetorical information in EST discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 10(3), 281-290.
Shaw J. (1995). A schema approach to the formal literature review in engineering theses. System, 23(3), 325-335.
Sim, J., & Wright, C. (2005). The Kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation and sample size requirements. Physical Therapy, 85, 257-268.
Strike, K., & Posner, G. (1983). Types of synthesis and their criteria. In S. Ward and L. Reed (Eds.), knowledge structure and use: implications for synthesis and interpretation (pp. 343-362). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Swales, J. (1971). Writing scientific English. London: Nelson.
描述 博士
國立政治大學
英國語文學研究所
94551504
99
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094551504
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 尤雪瑛zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Yu, Hsueh Yingen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 蕭政華zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Hsiao, Cheng Huaen_US
dc.creator (作者) 蕭政華zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Hsiao, Cheng Huaen_US
dc.date (日期) 2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned 8-Dec-2010 01:49:29 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 8-Dec-2010 01:49:29 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 8-Dec-2010 01:49:29 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0094551504en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/48825-
dc.description (描述) 博士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 英國語文學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94551504zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 在學術論文寫作眾多章節中,文獻回顧章節是讀寫過程中困難度較高的一章節,因此研究生普遍視為畏途。文獻回顧的語步分析在過去文獻中尚未受到重視。因此本論文旨在分析臺灣英語教學碩士論文中文獻回顧章節之語步結構。本論文提出兩個研究問題: (1)臺灣英語教學碩士論文文獻回顧章節之語步結構為何?(2)評選高分與評選低分的文獻回顧差異為何?本論文選出三十篇臺灣英語教學碩士論文中文獻回顧章節做為文本分析並將其評選高分群與評選低分群。本研究以四個主要語步來分析文獻回顧章節的語步結構。這四個主要語步分別為:(1)領域知識觀念介紹,(2)用主題方式整合過去之文獻,(3)聯結過去文獻與將進行之研究之關係,及(4)宣布將進行研究。每一主要語步都有數個次要語步。本論文討論語步出現的頻率,語步發展,語步組合結構及語步循環。
     本論文顯示第一語步使用的最為廣泛佔56.96%,第二語步佔22.39%,第三語步與第四語步各為11.74%與8.91%。收集之文獻回顧分為四組,分別為(1)表現最差,(2)表現較差,(3)表現稱職,及(4)表現最好。 結果發現表現最差的一組沒有任何主題發展,表現較差的一組有主題發展但是僅限於整合,表現稱職的一組有運用到四個主要語步,而表現最好的一組發現有數個全部語步的循環。本論文呈現臺灣英語教學碩士論文文獻回顧章節的語步結構。這些結果與討論提供英語教學領域研究生更加了解學術論文文獻回顧之寫作架構。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Reviewing literature for a research study is a highly complicated reading and writing process, which has been assumed a rather formidable task for many graduate students. In the field of English for Specific Purposes, many scholars have devoted their studies into certain types of genre analysis, particularly research genres. However, the concept of “literature review” (LR) as a distinct type of genre has been constantly overlooked and the move structure of literature reviews unexplored.
     The move structure of LRs in master theses written by Taiwanese TEFL program graduates was studied. This proposed study included two research questions: (1) What are the move structures of the LR chapters in the master theses of TEFL programs? (2) Do the move structures differ between the low-rated and high-rated LRs? In this study, thirty theses were randomly chosen. Thirty theses were rated and grouped into high-rated and low-rated categories. Based on Kwan’s framework (2006) and the results of pilot study, a new move structure with the four major moves was formulated for this study.
     The statistical results showed that “conceptualizing themes in a field (Move 1)” takes the largest proportion among the total occurrences, followed by “integrating previous works on the themes (Move 2),” “relating previous works to the current study (Move 3)” and “advancing to one’s own study (Move 4).” It is concluded that LRs composed by these graduates fundamentally serves to present relevant field knowledge. Further, no topic expansion is found in the deficient group. Most of the LRs in the poor group halt at the synthesis though there is some topic development. The competent group has a complete occurrence of the four major moves. Multiple cycles are found per LR in the distinctive group. This study provides insights into the move structure of Taiwanese students’ literature review chapters of master theses.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents Acknowledgement iii
     Chinese Abstract xxi
     English Abstract xxiii
     Chapter
      1. Introduction 1
      Motivation 1
     Research Questions 6
      Significance of this Study 6
      Organization of this Study 7
      2. Literature Review 8
      Genre 8
      Register Analysis: Linguistic Description of Grammatical Features 10
      Rhetorical Analysis: Linguistic Description of Functions 10
      Genre Analysis: Linguistic Explanation of Contexts 11
      Genre Studies 12
      Current Approaches 13
     Definition of Move 15
     Swales’s CARS Model of Introductions in Research Articles……….18
     Move Structures of Other Research Genres 21
      Literature Reviews as a Research Genre 21
      Kwan’s Framework 21
      Studies on Literature Review 23
      Evaluation of Literature Review 24
      Difficulties in Writing Up Literature Review 26
      Teaching LR in Thesis Writing Classes 28
      Summary of Literature Review 30
      3. Methodology 32
      Development of the Coding Scheme 34
      Pilot Study 34
      Open Coding 35
      Modification of Move Structure 37
      Revised Move Structure vs. Kwan’s framework 39
      Adapted Move Structure 42
      Major Moves 43
      Submoves 44
      Data Collection 52
      Data Analysis 53
      Frequency of Moves and Submoves 54
      Move Component Types 54
      Move Progression 54
      Move Configuration 54
      Move Cycle 55
      Rating 55
      Rating Scales 55
      Selection of Raters 57
      Rater’s Training Session 58
      Training Stage 1: Overview 58
      Training Stage 2: Trial rating and evaluation 58
      Formal rating procedures 58
      Coding 59
      Selection of Coders 60
      Coding Training Session 60
      Intercoder reliability 61
      4. Results and Discussions 62
      Overall Frequency of Moves 62
      Frequency of Major Moves 63
      Frequency of Submoves 64
     Frequency and Components of the LRs at Different Levels 67
     Frequencies of Submoves in Low-rated and High-rated LRs 68
     Frequencies of Submoves Among Four Groups of Writers 71
      Deficient vs Poor Groups 73
      Poor vs. Competent Groups 74
      Competent vs. Distinctive Groups 74
      Move Components Types 75
      Move Progression 77
      Average Number of Submoves Among Groups 80
      Starting Move 81
      Concluding Move 81
     Move Configuration 82
      Move Structure on Section Basis 82
      Move Structure Within Configuration 86
      Move Cycle 87
      The Deficient Group 89
      Textual Analysis of the Deficient Group 91
      The Poor Group 94
      Textual Analysis of the Poor Group 100
      The Competent Group 103
      Textual Analysis of the Competent Group 109
      The Distinctive Group 115
      Textual Analysis of the Distinctive Group 120
      5. Conclusion 127
      Summary of Major Findings 127
     Pedagogical Implication 131
      Limitation of this Study and Suggestions for Future Research 133
     References 134
     Appendix 149
      Rating Scale of MA Literature Reviews 149
     Vita 150
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094551504en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 文獻回顧zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 語步結構zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 學術論文寫作zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 學術英文zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Literature Reviewen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Move Structureen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Thesis Writingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Academic Writingen_US
dc.title (題名) 臺灣英語教學碩士論文中文獻探討章節之語步分析zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Move structure of literature review in Ma theses by Taiwanese TEFL Graduatesen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anthony, L. (1999). Writing research article introductions in software engineering: How accurate is a standard model? IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42, 38-46.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Barber C. (1962). Some measurable characteristics of modern scientific prose. In Contribution to English ‘syntax and philology. Reprinted in J.M. Swales (Ed.) Episodes in ESP. 1988. Hermel Hempstead: Prentice Hall International.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bardov-Harlig, K., & Bofman, T. (1989). Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 17-34.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bazerman,C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Belcher, D. (2004). Trends in teaching English for specific purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 154-186.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Berkenkotter, G., & Huckin, T. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bhatia, V.K. (1993). Analyzing genre: language use in professional settings. London: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bitchener J. & Basturkmen H. (2006).Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 4-19.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bloom, B., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, F.J., Hill, W.H., & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: cognitive domain . New York: McKay.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Swales, J. (1981). Aspects of article introductions. Birmingham, UK: LSU, University of Aston.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Swales, J.M.(1990). Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Swales, J.M., & Feak C.B. (2000). English in today’s research world: A writing guide. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Swales J.M., & Lindemann, S. (2002). Teaching the literature review to international graduate students. In A. Johns (Ed.), Genres and the classroom- multiple perspectives (pp. 105-119). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Swales, J., & Najjar, H. (1987). The writing of research article introductions. Written Communication, 4(2), 175-191.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tarone, E., Dwyer S., Gillette S., & Icke V. (1981). On the use of the passive in two astrophysics journal papers. ESP Journal, 1(2), 123-140.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Thompson (2005). Points of focus and position: Intertextual reference in PhD theses. Journal of English for Academic Purpose, 4, 307-323.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Thompson, P., & Tribble C. (2001) Looing at citations: using corpora in English for academic purposes. Language, Learning and Technology, 5(3) 91-105.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Trimble L. (1985). English for science and technology: a discourse approach. UK: Cambridge Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tsai, Y. C. (2006). Effects of online academic English materials on graduate students’ writing: introductions in research articles of the applied linguistic disciplines. Unpublished Master Thesis. National Ching Hua University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bock, J. & Irwin, D. (1980). Syntactic effects of information availability in sentence production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 467-484.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ward, G., & Birner, B. (2001). Discourse and information structure. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H.E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 119-137). Malden, MA: Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Weissberg, R. & Buker, S. (1990). Writing up research: Experimental research report writing for students of English. NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wilhelm, W.J., & Kaunelis, D. (2005). Literature reviews: analysis, planning, and query techniques. The DTEFLa Pi Epsilon Journal, 47(2), 91-106.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Williams, P. (1999). Result sections of medical research articles; analysis of rhetorical categories for pedagogical purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 347-366.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yang, R. & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 365-385.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉賢軒. (1999). <英文學術期刊論文中的解釋過程>。《第十六屆中華民國英語文教學國際研討會論文集》,頁375-384,台北市: 文鶴出版有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉賢軒. (2001). <學術期刊論文中的情態表達: 台灣博士生的「謹言慎行」>。《第十八屆中華民國英語文教學國際研討會論文集》,頁375-384,台北市: 文鶴出版有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉賢軒. (2003a). <章類分析與學術英文教學: 台灣博士生的摘要改進問題>,《英語教學》,第二十七卷第四期,頁65-77,國立台灣師範大學。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Boote, D.N. & Beile, P. (2005) Scholars before researchers: on the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34 (6), 3-15.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Borg, W.R., & Gall, M.D. (1989). Educational research: an introduction (5th ed.). New York: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brett.P. (1994). A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13 (1), 47-59.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown G. & Yule G. (1983). Discourse analysis. UK: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bunton, D. (1999) The use of higher level metatext in Ph.D. theses. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 41-56.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bunton, D. (2005). The structure of PhD conclusion chapters. Journal of English for Academic Purpose. 4, 207- 224.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chafe, W. (1979). The flow of thought and the flow of langauge. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 12. Discourse and syntax (p. 159-181). New York: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cheng A. (2007). Understanding learners and learning in ESP genre-based writing instruction. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 76-89.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chiu, R. (1972). Measuring register characteristics: a prerequisite for preparing advanced level TESOL programs. TESOL Quarterly, 6(2), 129-141.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Christie F. (1999). Genre theory and ESL teaching: a systemic functional perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 33(4), 759-763.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cooley, L., & Lewkowicz, J. (1995). The writing needs of graduate students’ at the University of Hong Kong: A project report. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 18, 121-123.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Crookes, G.. (1986) Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure. Applied Linguistics, 7, 57-70.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Crystal D., & Davy D. (1969). Investigating English style. IN: Indiana: University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Daiker, D., Kerek, A.,& Morenberg, M. (1986). The writer’s options: combining to composing. New York: Harper & Row.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dong Y. (1998). Non-native graduate students’ thesis/dissertation writing in science: self-reports by students and their advisors from two U.S. institutions. English for Specific Purposes, 17(4), 369-390.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dudley-Evans, T. (1986). Genre analysis: An investigation of the introduction and discussion sections of MSc dissertations. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Talking about text (pp. 128-145). Birmingham: English Language Research, University of Birmingham.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ellis J., & Ure J. (1969). Language varieties: register. In R. Meacham. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of linguistics: information and control, 251-250. London: Pergamon.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Feng, H.P. (2005). A process-product approach of teaching academic writing: ssing the teaching of writing a literature review as an example. Paper presented in the 22nd international conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China. June 4-5. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Flowerdew. J. (2002). Academic discourse. London: Pearson.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Froese, A.D, Gantz, B.S., and Henry, A.L. (1998). Teaching students to write literature reviews: a meta-analytic model. Teaching of Psychology, 25 (2), 102-105.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Givon, T. (1983). Topic continuation in discourse: The functional domain of switch reference. In J. Haiman & P. Munro (Eds.), Switch-reference and universal grammar (p. 51-82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Givon, T. (1987). Beyond foreground and background. In R.S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (p. 175-188). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gledhill, C. (2000). The discourse function of collocation in research article introduction. English for Specific Purposes, 19, 115-135.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gosden H. (1995). Success in research article writing and revision: a social-constructionist perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 14(1), 37-57.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Granello, D. H. (2001). Promoting cognitive complexity in graduate written work: Using bloom’s taxonomy as a pedagogical tool to improve literature reviews. Counselor Education and Supervision, 40 (4), 292-307.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Graney, J. (1992). A framework for text graphing. System. 20 (2). 161-167.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gregory, M., & Carroll. S. (1978).Language and situation: language varieties and their social contexts. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gustafsson, M. (1975). Some syntactic properties of English law language. Publications of the Department of English. University of Turku.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Halliday, M., & Hasan R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Halliday, M., & Hasan. R. (1989). Language, context and text: aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Halliday, M. (1976). Theme and information in the English Clause. In G.R. Kress (Ed.), System and function in language (p. 174-188). Oxford: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Halliday, M. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Halliday, M., McIntosh, A., & Strevens, P. (1964). The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review. London: Sage publications Ltd.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hewings M, 1993. The end! How to conclude a dissertation. In G M Blue (Ed.) Language, Learning and Success: studying through English, Developments in TEFL. Hemel Hempstead: Phoenix TEFL.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hill, T. (1958). Institutional linguistics. Orbis, 7, 441-445.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hill. S., Soppelsa B., & West G. (1982). Teaching ESL students to read and write experimental-research papers. TESOL Quarterly, 16(3), 333-347.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hopkins, A., & Dudley –Evans, T.(1988). A genre-based investigation of the discussion section in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7, 113-122.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hopper, P. (1979). Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In T. Givon (Ed.), Discourse and syntax (p. 213-241). New York: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hugh, A. (2003). Teaching for language teachers. UK: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hyland, K. (2004). Graduates’ gratitude: the generic structure of dissertation acknowledgements. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 303-324.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: an ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30(4), 693-722.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jenkins. S., Jordan, M., & Weiland, P. (1993). The role of writing in graduate engineering education: a survey of faculty beliefs and practices. English for Specific Purposes, 12, 51¬-67.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Johns A., & J. Swales (2002). Literacy and disciplinary practices: opening and closing perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1, 13-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Johns A. (1991). English for specific purposes (ESP): its history and contributions. In Celce-Murcia. (Ed.) Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston, Heinle & Heinle Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Johns, A. (2003). Genre and ESL/EFL composition instruction. In B. Kroll, (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing. (p. 195-217). New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kuno, S. (1980). Functional syntax. In E.A. Moravcski & J.R. Wirth (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 13. Current approaches to syntax (p. 117-135). New York: Academic Press)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kuo, C. (1999). The use of personal pronouns: role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 121-138.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kuo, C. (2001). Academic Competence: Designing an EAP Course for Ph.D. Students. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kuo, C. (2002). Phraseology in Scientific Research Articles. Selected Papers from the Eleventh International Symposium on English Teaching/ Fourth Pan-Asian Conference.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lau, H. (2003b). The structure of academic journal abstracts written by Taiwanese PhD students. Taiwan Journal of TESOL. Taipei: National Chengchi University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kwan, B. (2006). The Schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 25 (1), 30-55.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lackstrom J., Selinker L., & Trimble. L. (1973). Technical rhetorical principles and grammatical choice. TESOL Quarterly, 7(2), 127-136.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lather, P. (1999). To be of use: the work of reviewing. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 2-7.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lau, H. (2000). Interaction markers used by Taiwanese PhD students of physics. Selected Papers from the 13th International Symposium on English Teaching and Learning. 158-165.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lim, J. (2006). Method sections of management research articles: a pedagogically motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes, 25 (3), 282-309.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Liu, P. C. (2007). Learning how to write a good MA thesis literature review: a case study of one Taiwanese graduate student. Yuan Chih University, Unpubished master thesis.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lores R. (2004). On RA abstracts: from rhetorical structure to thematic organization. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 280-302.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Martin, J. (1985). Process and text: two aspects of human semiosis. In J. Benson and W. Greaves (Eds.): Systemic perspective on discourse. (pp. 248-274). Norwood NJ: Ablex.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Martin, J. (1992). English text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McCarthy M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. UK: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McNabb R. (2001). Making the gesture: graduate student submissions and the expectation of journal referees. Composition Studies, 29(1), 9-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Miller C.R.(1994). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Moravcsik M., & Murugesan P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of Citation. Social Studies of Science, 5, 86-92.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nwogu, K.(1997). The medical research paper: structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119-138.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Paltridge B. (1994). Genre analysis and the identification of textual boundaries, Applied Linguistics, 15, 288-299.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Paltridge, B. (2004). Academic writing. Language Teaching, 37, 87-105.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Peacock, M. ( 2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30, 479-497.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Petric B. (2007). Rhetorical functions of citations in high- and low-rated master’s theses. English for Specific Purposes, 6(3), 238-256.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Posteguillo, S. (1999). The semantic structure of computer science research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 139-160.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Prince, E. (1978). A comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts in discourse. Language, 54, 83-96.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reid. T. (1956). Linguistics, structuralism and philology. Archivum Linguisticicum, 8 (1), 21-37.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Richards, R. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. UK: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ruiying, Y., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: structures from a functional perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 264-279.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Samraj, B. (2002). Introduction in research articles: variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1), 1-17.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Santos, M. (1996) The textual organization of research paper abstract in applied linguistics. Text, 16, 481-499.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Saville-Troike, M. (1982). The ethnography of communication. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Scott, W. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: the case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 17, 321-325.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Selinker L., Trimble M., & Trimble L. (1978). Rhetorical function- shift in EST discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 12(3), 311-320.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Selinker L., Trimble R.,& Trimble L. (1976). presuppositional rhetorical information in EST discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 10(3), 281-290.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shaw J. (1995). A schema approach to the formal literature review in engineering theses. System, 23(3), 325-335.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sim, J., & Wright, C. (2005). The Kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation and sample size requirements. Physical Therapy, 85, 257-268.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Strike, K., & Posner, G. (1983). Types of synthesis and their criteria. In S. Ward and L. Reed (Eds.), knowledge structure and use: implications for synthesis and interpretation (pp. 343-362). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Swales, J. (1971). Writing scientific English. London: Nelson.zh_TW