1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Foreign Languages and Literature
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 英語教學在職專班研究生論文寫作困難與對策
ETMA students’ perceived difficulties and their coping strategies in thesis writing
作者 許柔恩
Hsu, Jou En
貢獻者 黃怡萍
Huang, Yi Ping
許柔恩
Hsu, Jou En
關鍵詞 論文寫作
寫作困難
寫作策略
thesis writing
writing difficulties
strategies of writing
日期 2012
上傳時間 1-Feb-2013 16:47:57 (UTC+8)
摘要 過去研究顯示，以英文為第二語言的研究生，無論在以英語為第二語言或是以英語為外語的環境下，都會在進行研究和論文寫作時遇到困難(Bitchener & Basturkmen, 2005; Buckingham, 2005; Dong, 1998; Lee, 2008; O’Connor, Greene & Anderson, 2006; Onwuegbuzie & Leech, 2006; Reeves, Herrington, & Oliver, 2005)，然而，相關研究卻缺乏探究在以英語為外語的環境下，同時身為研究生和在職教師的這群學生們所遭遇的困難，及其如何利用可取得的資源去解決論文寫作上的難題。本研究旨在藉由質性個案研究方式，以社會文化學習的角度，特別是van Lier (2004)的擴充式建構理論(expanded ZPD)，取得更多關於身為學校老師的在職研究生在論文寫作過程中遇到的困難以及解決對策的詳細資訊，以期對論文寫作教學以及論文指導上有所貢獻。本研究共邀請到三組指導教授與研究生，每組包含一位教授與他們的兩位研究生。資料來源包含與所有研究參與者的訪談內容、論文寫作相關書籍，以及學生的論文草稿，最後經由對比原始資料得出研究結果。
研究結果顯示學生在寫論文前遇到的困難是研究設計與處理資料，而在寫論文各章節時，他們會同時遇到文字上以及文體格式方面的困難。根據各章節的文體要求，學生們認為文獻回顧、研究發現，以及討論研究結果是最困難的章節，而結論是困難度最小的章節。而這些困難可歸因於學生為非母語寫作者，以及他們對於學術規範的不熟悉。此外，本研究也發現，在職班學生可取得的資源包括同儕、專家、學術出版品，以及自身。
基於上述發現，本研究提出研究所課程的教師應提供學生更多閱讀學術論文的機會，以及在課程中融入讓學生可應用課堂所學的任務。指導教授也能事先提醒學生論文中較為困難的部份，以及告訴學生有哪些可取得資源是有助於論文寫作的。未來，需要更多人誌學以及日記研究法的方式研究，以期能更深入了解在職研究生在論文寫作上的需求。
Though a number of studies have revealed that both the L2 graduate students in English as a Second Language (ESL) and English as a Foreign Language (EFL) contexts may encounter difficulties in conducting research and writing theses (Bitchener& Basturkmen, 2005; Buckingham, 2005; Dong, 1998; Lee, 2008; O’Connor, Greene& Anderson, 2006; Onwuegbuzie & Leech, 2006; Reeves, Herrington& Oliver, 2005), research about how the graduate students who are also in-service teachers in EFL settings cope with the difficulties in thesis writing by making use of the sources available still lacks. Thus, this study aimed to have an in-depth understanding of the difficulties this group of students faced in the process of thesis writing and the ways they adopted to deal with the problems via a qualitative case study and with the social cultural perspective of learning, especially the framework of expanded ZPD (van Leir, 2004) .Three advisor-advisee pairs were invited to participate in the present study, and each pair was comprised of one advisor and two advisees. Data for analysis were collected from multiple sources, including semi-structured interviews with the participants, the textbook of the thesis writing course, and the drafts of theses. Data were analyzed by constant comparative method (Lincoln & Guba, 1985). The results showed that the students faced difficulties about research design and compiling the data even before writing theses. When writing each section of a thesis, they had troubles both at the linguistic level and the rhetorical level. According to the rhetorical regulations of each section, Literature Review, Results, and Discussion were viewed as the three most difficult sections and Conclusion the least difficult section for the students. Hence, the unfamiliarity of academic conventions and the lower English writing abilities contributed to the difficulties the students faced during thesis writing. Moreover, the findings disclosed that the sources available for the students as in-service teachers included human resources such as peers and experts, material resources such as academic publications, and inner knowledge from self.
Based upon above findings, it is suggested that the courses of graduate schools should provide students more opportunities to read academic texts extensively and practice what they learn in class. Also, the advisors should remind students of the problematic area of a specific section and tell students the resources available in the academic context. In the future, more ethnographic and diary studies are needed to explore what challenges the students who are also in-service teachers encounter in the thesis writing processes and how they solve these problems because this group of students may have different needs in thesis writing
參考文獻 REFERENCES
Aı´da, W. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: a conceptual framework. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159-180.
Alison, D., Cooley, L., Lewkowicz, J., &Nunan, D. (1998). Dissertation writing in action: The development of a dissertation writing support program for ESL graduate research students. English for Specific Purposes, 17(2), 199-217.
Belcher, D. (1994) The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 23-24.
Bitchener, J. & Basturkmen, H. (2005). Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 4-18.
Bizzell, P. (1992). Academic discourse and critical consciousness. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Bruce, C.S. (1994). Research students’ early experiences of the dissertation literature review. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 217-229.
Buckingham, L. (2008). Development of English academic writing competence by Turkish scholars. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 3, 1-18.
Cadman, K. (1997). Thesis writing for international students: A question of identity? English for Specific Purposes, 16, 13-14.
Carspecken, P. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge.
Casanave, C.P. (2002). Writing games: Multicultural case studies of academic literacy practices in higher education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Casanave, C. P., & Hubbard, P. (1992). The writing assignments and writing problems of doctoral students: Faculty perceptions, pedagogical issues, and needed research. English for Specific Purposes, 11, 33-49.
Cheng, A. (2008). Individualized engagement with genre in academic literacy tasks. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 384-411.
Cho, D. W. (2009). Science journal paper writing in an EFL context: The case of Korea. English for Specific Purposes, 28, 230-239.
Chung, C. N. (張繼寧). (2010). New Proposal for professional development of British teachers: Masters in teaching and learning. Taiwan Teacher Education Database, 4. Retrieved November 20, 2011, from http://society.nhu.edu.tw/e-j/95/A10.htm
Cooley, L., & Lewkowicz, J. (1995). The writing needs of graduate students at the University of Hong Kong: A project report. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 18, 121–123.
Corti, L. (1993). Using diaries in social research. Social Research Update 2.
Donato, R. (1994) Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf and G. Appel (eds) Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research (pp. 35-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Dong, Y. (1996). Learning how to use citations for knowledge transformation: non-native doctoral students’ dissertation writing in science. Research in the Teaching of English, 30, 428–457.
Dong, Y. (1998). Non-native graduate students’ thesis/dissertation writing in science: Self-reports by students and their advisors from two US institutions. English for Specific Purposes, 17, 369–390.
Dressen-Hammouda, D. (2007) From novice to disciplinary expert: Disciplinary identity and genre mastery. English for Specific Purposes, 27 , 233-252.
Duff, P.A.(2010). Language socialization into academic discourse communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 169-192.
Ferenz, O. (2005). EFL writers’ social networks: Impact on advanced academic literacy development. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 339-361.
Flowerdew, J. (1999). Problems in writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing 8(3), 243-264.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Freedman, A. (1989). Reconceiving genre. Texte 8 (9). 279–292.
Gall, M.D., Borg, W.R., & Gall, J.P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction (6th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Gibbons, P. (2002) Scaffolding Language, Scaffolding Learning. Potsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Gosden, H. (1996). Verbal reports of Japanese Novices’ Research Writing Practices in English. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(2), 109-128.
Hsu, Y.& Kuo, CH. (2008).Writing RA Introduction: Difficulties and Strategies. Retrieved September 13, 2012, from http://tesol.nctu.edu.tw/FCKupload/File/students_paper/Writing%20RA%20Introduction%20Difficulties%20and%20Strategies_%E5%BE%90%E6%98%B1%E6%84%B7.pdf
Hsu, W.L. (2010). Dissertation Writing for NNES Students Regarding Writing Process, Difficulties, and Support. Retrieved September10, 2012, from http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/handle/10125/20168/Hsu2010.pdf?sequence=1
James, P. L., &Steven L. T.(2006). Socialcultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.
James, P. L.(2007). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford University Press.
Jenkins, S., Jordan, M., &Weiland, P. (1993). The role of writing in graduate engineering education: A survey of faculty beliefs and practices. English for Specific Purposes, 12, 51–67.
Jordan, R. R. (1997). English for academic purposes: A gilding and course book for teachers 1-13. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Kuo, M. H. (郭明樺). (2008). Study of Factors Attributing Elementary School Teacher to Pursue Further Education. E-paper Professional Development of In-service Teachers, 4. Retrieved November 20, 2011, from http://www1.inservice.edu.tw/EPaper/ep2/indexView.aspx?EID=102
Lea, M. & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157-172.
Lee, H. Y. (李欣怡) (2008). Challenges throughout the process of writing a Master’s thesis: The voices of Taiwanese graduate EFL students and their advisors. Unpublished master’s thesis, Providence University.
Li, Y. (2007). Apprentice scholarly writing in a community of practice: an intravie of an NNES graduate student writing a research article. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 55-79.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
Merton, R. K. Fiske, M., & Kendall, P. L. (1990). The focused interview: A manual of problems and procedures (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
Mellon, C. (1990). Naturalistic inquiry for library science: Methods and applications for research, evaluation, and teaching. New York: Greenwood.
Mullen, Carol A. (2001). The need for a curricular writing model for graduate students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25(1), 117-126.
Newman, I., & Benz, C. R. (1998). Qualitative-quantitative research methodology: Exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
O’Connor, K.A., Greene, H.C., Anderson, P.J. (2006). Action research: A tool for improving teacher quality and classroom practice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Okamura, A. (2006). Hoe do Japanese researchers cope with language difficulties and succeed in scientific discourse in English? : interviews with Japanese research article writers. The Economic Journal of Takasaki City University of Economics, 48 (3), 61-78.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. The Qualitative Report 11(3), 474-498.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2003). Assessment in statistics courses: More than a tool for evaluation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), 115-127.
Paltridge, B. (1997). Thesis and dissertation writing: Preparing ESL students for research. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 61-70.
Paltridge, B. (2002). Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 125-143.
Paltridge, B. (2004). Academic writing. Language Teaching, 37, 87-105
Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others’ words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 201-230.
Qian, J., & Krugly-Smolska, E. (2008). Chinese graduate students’ experiences with writing a literature review. TESL Canada Journal, 26(1), 68-86.
Ratner, C. (2002). Cultural psychology: Theory and method. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
Reeves, T. C., Herrington, J.& Oliver, R. (2005). Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 16(2), 97-116.
Samara,B. (2002). Introduction in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 1-17.
Shaw, P. (1991). Science research students’ composing processes. English
for Specific Purposes, 10, 189–206.
Silva, T. (1997). Differences in ESL and native-English speaker writing: the research and its implications. InC. Severino, J. C., Guerra & S. E. Butler (eds.), Writing in multicultural settings. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 209–219.
Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative research for social scientistis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales,J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J.M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tsai, C. C. (蔡春綢) (2004). Related research in the motive of participation in the in-service education and teaching effectiveness for social subject teacher of Taipei county primary school. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Hualien University of Education.
van Leir, L. (2004). The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Westbrook, L. (1994). Qualitative research methods: A review of major stages, data analysis techniques, and quality controls. Library and Information Science Research, 241-254.
Yang, C.T. (楊正德) (2011). The correlation of Taipei county elementary school teacher’s motivation of in-service education, teaching readiness, and teaching effectiveness. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Normal University.
Yeh, C.(2010). New graduate students’ perspectives on research writing in English: A case study in Taiwan. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 4(1), A1-A12
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research design and methods (4th ed.). CA: Sage.
Ratio of primary and secondary teachers with MA degree. (2011). Retrived November 8, 2011, from http://www.edu.tw/STATISTICS/content.aspx?site_content_sn=8956
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學研究所
98551017
101
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098551017
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 黃怡萍zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Huang, Yi Pingen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 許柔恩zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Hsu, Jou Enen_US
dc.creator (作者) 許柔恩zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Hsu, Jou Enen_US
dc.date (日期) 2012en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Feb-2013 16:47:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Feb-2013 16:47:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Feb-2013 16:47:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0098551017en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/56803-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 英國語文學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 98551017zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 101zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 過去研究顯示，以英文為第二語言的研究生，無論在以英語為第二語言或是以英語為外語的環境下，都會在進行研究和論文寫作時遇到困難(Bitchener & Basturkmen, 2005; Buckingham, 2005; Dong, 1998; Lee, 2008; O’Connor, Greene & Anderson, 2006; Onwuegbuzie & Leech, 2006; Reeves, Herrington, & Oliver, 2005)，然而，相關研究卻缺乏探究在以英語為外語的環境下，同時身為研究生和在職教師的這群學生們所遭遇的困難，及其如何利用可取得的資源去解決論文寫作上的難題。本研究旨在藉由質性個案研究方式，以社會文化學習的角度，特別是van Lier (2004)的擴充式建構理論(expanded ZPD)，取得更多關於身為學校老師的在職研究生在論文寫作過程中遇到的困難以及解決對策的詳細資訊，以期對論文寫作教學以及論文指導上有所貢獻。本研究共邀請到三組指導教授與研究生，每組包含一位教授與他們的兩位研究生。資料來源包含與所有研究參與者的訪談內容、論文寫作相關書籍，以及學生的論文草稿，最後經由對比原始資料得出研究結果。
研究結果顯示學生在寫論文前遇到的困難是研究設計與處理資料，而在寫論文各章節時，他們會同時遇到文字上以及文體格式方面的困難。根據各章節的文體要求，學生們認為文獻回顧、研究發現，以及討論研究結果是最困難的章節，而結論是困難度最小的章節。而這些困難可歸因於學生為非母語寫作者，以及他們對於學術規範的不熟悉。此外，本研究也發現，在職班學生可取得的資源包括同儕、專家、學術出版品，以及自身。
基於上述發現，本研究提出研究所課程的教師應提供學生更多閱讀學術論文的機會，以及在課程中融入讓學生可應用課堂所學的任務。指導教授也能事先提醒學生論文中較為困難的部份，以及告訴學生有哪些可取得資源是有助於論文寫作的。未來，需要更多人誌學以及日記研究法的方式研究，以期能更深入了解在職研究生在論文寫作上的需求。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Though a number of studies have revealed that both the L2 graduate students in English as a Second Language (ESL) and English as a Foreign Language (EFL) contexts may encounter difficulties in conducting research and writing theses (Bitchener& Basturkmen, 2005; Buckingham, 2005; Dong, 1998; Lee, 2008; O’Connor, Greene& Anderson, 2006; Onwuegbuzie & Leech, 2006; Reeves, Herrington& Oliver, 2005), research about how the graduate students who are also in-service teachers in EFL settings cope with the difficulties in thesis writing by making use of the sources available still lacks. Thus, this study aimed to have an in-depth understanding of the difficulties this group of students faced in the process of thesis writing and the ways they adopted to deal with the problems via a qualitative case study and with the social cultural perspective of learning, especially the framework of expanded ZPD (van Leir, 2004) .Three advisor-advisee pairs were invited to participate in the present study, and each pair was comprised of one advisor and two advisees. Data for analysis were collected from multiple sources, including semi-structured interviews with the participants, the textbook of the thesis writing course, and the drafts of theses. Data were analyzed by constant comparative method (Lincoln & Guba, 1985). The results showed that the students faced difficulties about research design and compiling the data even before writing theses. When writing each section of a thesis, they had troubles both at the linguistic level and the rhetorical level. According to the rhetorical regulations of each section, Literature Review, Results, and Discussion were viewed as the three most difficult sections and Conclusion the least difficult section for the students. Hence, the unfamiliarity of academic conventions and the lower English writing abilities contributed to the difficulties the students faced during thesis writing. Moreover, the findings disclosed that the sources available for the students as in-service teachers included human resources such as peers and experts, material resources such as academic publications, and inner knowledge from self.
Based upon above findings, it is suggested that the courses of graduate schools should provide students more opportunities to read academic texts extensively and practice what they learn in class. Also, the advisors should remind students of the problematic area of a specific section and tell students the resources available in the academic context. In the future, more ethnographic and diary studies are needed to explore what challenges the students who are also in-service teachers encounter in the thesis writing processes and how they solve these problems because this group of students may have different needs in thesis writing		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents Table of Contents
Acknowledgement…………...……………………………………………………….iii
Table of Contents…….……………………………………………………………....iv
Chinese Abstract………………………………………………………………………x
English Abstract……………………………………………………………………...xii

Chapter One: Introduction…………………………………………………………....1
1.0 Introduction……………………………………………………………………….1
1.1 Background and Rationale of the Study…………………………………………..1
1.2 The Purpose of the Study………………………………………………………….4
1.3 Research Questions………………………………………………………………..4
1.4 Definition of Terms………………………………………………………………..5

Chapter Two: Literature Review………………………………………………..6
2.1 Learning within Social cultural Perspective……………………………………….6
2.2 Before writing theses………………………………………………………………8
2.2.1 Difficulties and factors………………………………………………………8
2.2.2 Coping strategies…………………………………………………………...10
2.3 While Writing Theses…………………………………………………………….10
2.3.1 Linguistic Difficulties and the Factors……………………………………10
2.3.1.1 Coping Strategies…………………………………………………12
2.3.2 Rhetorical Difficulties and the Factors…………………………………….13
2.3.2.1 Coping Strategies………………………………………………….15
2.4 Identifying the Gap……………………………………………………………….17
2.6 Purpose…………………………………………………………………………18
2.7 Research Questions……………………………………………………………..18
Chapter Three: Methodology…………………………………………………….19
3.0 Introduction………………………………………………………………………19
3.1 Research Design………………………………………………………………….19
3.2 Context…………………………………………………………………………...19
3.3 Participants……………………………………………………………………….21
3.4 Data Collection Method…………………………………………………………25
3.4.1 Semi-structured Interviews…………………………………………………26
3.4.1.1 Student interviews…………………………………………………26
3.4.1.2 Teacher Interviews………………………………………………...27
3.4.1.3 Artifacts……………………………………………………………..27
3.4.2 Procedure for Data Collection………………………...……………………27
3.5 Data analysis……………………………………………………………………..30
3.6 Validation…………………………………………………………………………32
3.7 Roles of the researcher………………………………...…………………………33

Chapter Four: Findings…………………………………………………………34
4.0 Introduction………………………………………………………………………34
4.1 Difficulties Emerge from the Process of Thesis Writing…………………………34
4.1.1 Difficulties in Literature Review…………………………………………...34
4.1.1.1 Students’ Perspectives……………………..………………………34
4.1.1.2 Teachers’ Perspectives…………………..…………………………38
4.1.1.3 Advisor- advisee Pairs……………………………………………39
4.1.1.4 Coping Strategies………………………………………………….39
4.1.1.4. 1 Students’ Perspectives…………………………………..39
4.1.1.4.2 Teachers’ Perspectives…………………………………...42
4.1.1.5 Summary…………………………………………………………..43
4.1.2 Difficulties in Discussion…………………………………………………..44
4.1.2.1 Students’ Perspectives……………………………………………..44
4.1.2.2 Teachers’ Perspectives…………………..…………………………47
4.1.2.3 Advisor-advisee Pairs…………………………………………….48
4.1.2.4 Coping Strategies to the Difficulties in Discussion...……...……48
4.1.2.4.1 Students’ Perspectives………………….……………..50
4.1.2.4.2 Teachers’ Perspectives………………….……………...51
4.1.2.5 Summary………………………………………………………..51
4.1.3 Difficulties in Results…………………………………………………52
4.1.3.1 Students’ Perspectives…………………………………………..52
4.1.3.2 Teachers’ Perspectives……………………………………………55
4.1.3.3 Advisor-advisee Pairs…………………………………………...57
4.1.3.4 Coping Strategies to the Difficulties in Results………………..58
4.1.3.4.1 Students’ Perspectives…………….…………………...58
4.1.3.4.2 Teachers’ Perspectives…………………………………60
4.1.3.5 Summary…………………………………………………………61
4.1.4 Difficulties in Introduction…………………………………………………62
4.1.4.1 Students’ Perspectives………………………………………62
4.1.4.2 Teachers’ Perspectives……………………………………….64
4.1.4.3 Advisor-advisee Pairs………………………………………...65
4.1.4.4 Coping Strategies………………………………………………….65
4.1.4.4.1 Students’ Perspectives………………………………...65
4.1.4.4.2 Teachers’ Perspectives………………………………..66
4.1.4.5 Summary………………………………………………………..67
4.1.5 Difficulties in Conclusion………………………………………………….67
4.1.5.1 Students’ Perspectives………………………………………..68
4.1.5.2 Teachers’ Perspectives………………………………………..69
4.1.5.3 Advisor-advisee Pairs……………………………………………71
4.1.5.4 Coping Strategies……………….…………………………………71
4.1.5.4.1 Students’ Perspectives...………………………………..71
4.1.5.5 Summary…………………………………………………………..73
4.2 Difficulties in the Preparation of Writing………………………………………..73
4.2.1 Difficulties about Research Design………………………………………...73
4.2.1.1 Students’ Perspectives……………………….…………………….73
4.2.1.2 Teachers’ Perspectives……………………………………………..74
4.2.1.3 Advisor-advisee Pairs……………………………………………75
4.2.1.4 Coping Strategies………………………………………………..76
4.2.1.4.1 Students’ Perspectives……………...……………………76
4.2.1.4.2 Teachers’ perspectives………………...…………………76
4.2.1.5 Summary………………………………………………………..77
4.2.2 Difficulties about data analysis…………………………………………….78
4.2.2.1 Students’ perspectives……………………………………………..78
4.2.2.2 Teachers’ Perspectives……………………………………………..79
4.2.2.3 Advisor-advisee Pairs……………………………………………...80
4.3.3.4 Coping Strategies………………………………………………….81
4.2.2.4.1 Students’ Perspectives…………………………………...81
4.2.2.4.2 Teachers’ Perspectives…………………………………..82
4.2.2.5 Summary…………………………………………………………84
4.3 Role of Experts………….………………………………………………………..84
4.3.1 Advisor as a Guide……...………………………………………………….85
4.3.1.1 Students’ Perspectives……………………………………………..85
4.3.1.2 Advisors’ Perspectives……………………………………………86
4.3.2 Advisor as a Consultant…………………………………………………..87
4.3.2.1 Students’ Perspectives……………………………………………..87
4.3.2.2 Advisors’ Perspectives…………………………………………..89
4.3.3 Advisor as a Reviewer………………….…………………………………..90
4.3.3.1 Students’ Perspectives…………………………………………..99
4.3.3.2 Advisors’ Perspectives…………………………………………91
4.3.4. Experts of Statistics as Consultants………………………………………93
4.3.5 Summary………………………………………………………………….93
4.4 Role of Peers……………………………………………………………………94
4.4.1 Summary………………………………………………………………...…97
4.5 Self Role…………………………………………………………………………97
4.5.1 Summary………………………………………………………………..….98

Chapter Five Discussion……………………………………………………...100
5.0 Introduction……………………………………………………………………..100
5.1 Research Question One…………………………………………………………100
5.1.1 Answer of the Research Question………………………………………100
5.1.2 Difficulties before Writing Theses………………………………………..103
5.1.3 Linguistic and Rhetorical Difficulties within the Same Section………….104
5.1.4 The Top Three Difficult Sections and the Least Difficult Section………..105
5.1.5 Difference between the Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives……………106
5.1.6 Relation between the Writing Difficulties and Novice Writers…………107
5.2 Research Question Two to Four………...………………………………………108
5.2.1 Answer of the Research Questions………..………………………………108
5.2.2 The Relation between the Strategies Adopted and the Types of Difficulties and the Available Resources……………………………………………...110
5.2.3 The Role of the Human Resources in the Students’ Thesis Writing Process…………………………………………………………………111
5.2.3.1 Role of the experts………………………………………………..112
5.2.3.2 Role of peers……………………………………………………..113
5.2.3.3 Role of the self………...…………………………………………114
5.3 Summary………………………………………………………………………114
5.4 Pedagogical Implications……………………………………………………….115
5.5 Limitation of the Study…………………………………………………………118
5.6 Suggestions for Future Research………………………………………………..118
5.7 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………119
References…………………………………………………………………………121
Appendixes………………………………………………………………………126
A. Consent Form (Teachers)…………………………………………………...126
B. Consent Form (Students)……………………………………………………127
C. First Interview Protocol (Students)…………………………………………128
D. Interview Protocol(Advisors)……………………………………………..132
E. Interview Protocol (the Course Instructor)……...………………………..…136		zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098551017en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 論文寫作zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 寫作困難zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 寫作策略zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) thesis writingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) writing difficultiesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) strategies of writingen_US
dc.title (題名) 英語教學在職專班研究生論文寫作困難與對策zh_TW
dc.title (題名) ETMA students’ perceived difficulties and their coping strategies in thesis writingen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) REFERENCES
Aı´da, W. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: a conceptual framework. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159-180.
Alison, D., Cooley, L., Lewkowicz, J., &Nunan, D. (1998). Dissertation writing in action: The development of a dissertation writing support program for ESL graduate research students. English for Specific Purposes, 17(2), 199-217.
Belcher, D. (1994) The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 23-24.
Bitchener, J. & Basturkmen, H. (2005). Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 4-18.
Bizzell, P. (1992). Academic discourse and critical consciousness. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Bruce, C.S. (1994). Research students’ early experiences of the dissertation literature review. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 217-229.
Buckingham, L. (2008). Development of English academic writing competence by Turkish scholars. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 3, 1-18.
Cadman, K. (1997). Thesis writing for international students: A question of identity? English for Specific Purposes, 16, 13-14.
Carspecken, P. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge.
Casanave, C.P. (2002). Writing games: Multicultural case studies of academic literacy practices in higher education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Casanave, C. P., & Hubbard, P. (1992). The writing assignments and writing problems of doctoral students: Faculty perceptions, pedagogical issues, and needed research. English for Specific Purposes, 11, 33-49.
Cheng, A. (2008). Individualized engagement with genre in academic literacy tasks. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 384-411.
Cho, D. W. (2009). Science journal paper writing in an EFL context: The case of Korea. English for Specific Purposes, 28, 230-239.
Chung, C. N. (張繼寧). (2010). New Proposal for professional development of British teachers: Masters in teaching and learning. Taiwan Teacher Education Database, 4. Retrieved November 20, 2011, from http://society.nhu.edu.tw/e-j/95/A10.htm
Cooley, L., & Lewkowicz, J. (1995). The writing needs of graduate students at the University of Hong Kong: A project report. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 18, 121–123.
Corti, L. (1993). Using diaries in social research. Social Research Update 2.
Donato, R. (1994) Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf and G. Appel (eds) Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research (pp. 35-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Dong, Y. (1996). Learning how to use citations for knowledge transformation: non-native doctoral students’ dissertation writing in science. Research in the Teaching of English, 30, 428–457.
Dong, Y. (1998). Non-native graduate students’ thesis/dissertation writing in science: Self-reports by students and their advisors from two US institutions. English for Specific Purposes, 17, 369–390.
Dressen-Hammouda, D. (2007) From novice to disciplinary expert: Disciplinary identity and genre mastery. English for Specific Purposes, 27 , 233-252.
Duff, P.A.(2010). Language socialization into academic discourse communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 169-192.
Ferenz, O. (2005). EFL writers’ social networks: Impact on advanced academic literacy development. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 339-361.
Flowerdew, J. (1999). Problems in writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing 8(3), 243-264.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Freedman, A. (1989). Reconceiving genre. Texte 8 (9). 279–292.
Gall, M.D., Borg, W.R., & Gall, J.P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction (6th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Gibbons, P. (2002) Scaffolding Language, Scaffolding Learning. Potsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Gosden, H. (1996). Verbal reports of Japanese Novices’ Research Writing Practices in English. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(2), 109-128.
Hsu, Y.& Kuo, CH. (2008).Writing RA Introduction: Difficulties and Strategies. Retrieved September 13, 2012, from http://tesol.nctu.edu.tw/FCKupload/File/students_paper/Writing%20RA%20Introduction%20Difficulties%20and%20Strategies_%E5%BE%90%E6%98%B1%E6%84%B7.pdf
Hsu, W.L. (2010). Dissertation Writing for NNES Students Regarding Writing Process, Difficulties, and Support. Retrieved September10, 2012, from http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/handle/10125/20168/Hsu2010.pdf?sequence=1
James, P. L., &Steven L. T.(2006). Socialcultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.
James, P. L.(2007). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford University Press.
Jenkins, S., Jordan, M., &Weiland, P. (1993). The role of writing in graduate engineering education: A survey of faculty beliefs and practices. English for Specific Purposes, 12, 51–67.
Jordan, R. R. (1997). English for academic purposes: A gilding and course book for teachers 1-13. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Kuo, M. H. (郭明樺). (2008). Study of Factors Attributing Elementary School Teacher to Pursue Further Education. E-paper Professional Development of In-service Teachers, 4. Retrieved November 20, 2011, from http://www1.inservice.edu.tw/EPaper/ep2/indexView.aspx?EID=102
Lea, M. & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157-172.
Lee, H. Y. (李欣怡) (2008). Challenges throughout the process of writing a Master’s thesis: The voices of Taiwanese graduate EFL students and their advisors. Unpublished master’s thesis, Providence University.
Li, Y. (2007). Apprentice scholarly writing in a community of practice: an intravie of an NNES graduate student writing a research article. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 55-79.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
Merton, R. K. Fiske, M., & Kendall, P. L. (1990). The focused interview: A manual of problems and procedures (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
Mellon, C. (1990). Naturalistic inquiry for library science: Methods and applications for research, evaluation, and teaching. New York: Greenwood.
Mullen, Carol A. (2001). The need for a curricular writing model for graduate students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25(1), 117-126.
Newman, I., & Benz, C. R. (1998). Qualitative-quantitative research methodology: Exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
O’Connor, K.A., Greene, H.C., Anderson, P.J. (2006). Action research: A tool for improving teacher quality and classroom practice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Okamura, A. (2006). Hoe do Japanese researchers cope with language difficulties and succeed in scientific discourse in English? : interviews with Japanese research article writers. The Economic Journal of Takasaki City University of Economics, 48 (3), 61-78.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. The Qualitative Report 11(3), 474-498.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2003). Assessment in statistics courses: More than a tool for evaluation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), 115-127.
Paltridge, B. (1997). Thesis and dissertation writing: Preparing ESL students for research. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 61-70.
Paltridge, B. (2002). Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 125-143.
Paltridge, B. (2004). Academic writing. Language Teaching, 37, 87-105
Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others’ words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 201-230.
Qian, J., & Krugly-Smolska, E. (2008). Chinese graduate students’ experiences with writing a literature review. TESL Canada Journal, 26(1), 68-86.
Ratner, C. (2002). Cultural psychology: Theory and method. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
Reeves, T. C., Herrington, J.& Oliver, R. (2005). Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 16(2), 97-116.
Samara,B. (2002). Introduction in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 1-17.
Shaw, P. (1991). Science research students’ composing processes. English
for Specific Purposes, 10, 189–206.
Silva, T. (1997). Differences in ESL and native-English speaker writing: the research and its implications. InC. Severino, J. C., Guerra & S. E. Butler (eds.), Writing in multicultural settings. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 209–219.
Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative research for social scientistis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales,J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J.M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tsai, C. C. (蔡春綢) (2004). Related research in the motive of participation in the in-service education and teaching effectiveness for social subject teacher of Taipei county primary school. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Hualien University of Education.
van Leir, L. (2004). The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Westbrook, L. (1994). Qualitative research methods: A review of major stages, data analysis techniques, and quality controls. Library and Information Science Research, 241-254.
Yang, C.T. (楊正德) (2011). The correlation of Taipei county elementary school teacher’s motivation of in-service education, teaching readiness, and teaching effectiveness. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Normal University.
Yeh, C.(2010). New graduate students’ perspectives on research writing in English: A case study in Taiwan. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 4(1), A1-A12
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research design and methods (4th ed.). CA: Sage.
Ratio of primary and secondary teachers with MA degree. (2011). Retrived November 8, 2011, from http://www.edu.tw/STATISTICS/content.aspx?site_content_sn=8956		zh_TW