1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Social Science
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 鄰近性、吸收能力與廠商創新績效之研究
Proximity, absorptive capacity, and innovation performance of firms
作者 陳泓汝
貢獻者 邊泰明
陳泓汝
關鍵詞 地理鄰近性
組織鄰近性
產業網絡
吸收能力
創新績效
geographical proximity
organizational proximity
industrial network
abosrptive capacity
innovation performance
日期 2009
上傳時間 3-Sep-2013 14:51:23 (UTC+8)
摘要 知識經濟的時代，創新已成為廠商競爭優勢的主要來源。知識的創造、傳遞、轉化和應用，促成廠商創新活動的產生。同時，連結地域空間與廠商創新績效的研究，已成為近代區域經濟與產業發展的重要議題。又，研究者逐漸意識到廠商個體的異質性，進而探求個別廠商的內部能力，吸收能力即成為研究焦點之一。
基此，本研究以全台灣生物技術產業為研究對象，透過廠商問卷之發放，運用因素分析與結構方程模型為分析工具，探討鄰近性－地理鄰近性和組織鄰近性的內涵，以及吸收能力如何扮演外部知識與廠商內部能力的介面，並結合外部知識、內部吸收能力與創新績效之影響路徑。
所得結果如下：
1.從外部知識層面，地理鄰近性扮演重要角色。對於組織鄰近性、創新績效有正面影響效果。其中，組織鄰近性隱含了組織網絡與社會網絡的成分；
2.觀察外部知識與內部能力的連結，外部知識獲取對於吸收能力有正面影響效果；
3.吸收能力對於創新績效亦有正向影響關係；
4.然而，考量到外部知識因素時，吸收能力對於創新績效的效果轉為正向卻不顯著，外部知識直接影響創新績效。

關鍵字：地理鄰近性、組織鄰近性、產業網絡、吸收能力、創新績效
In the knowledge-based economy, innovation has become a key source of firms’ competitive advantage.The process of knowledge creation, transmission, transformation and application promotes the innovative activities. Meanwhile, the link geographical proximity and innovation performance of firms has become a modern issue of regional economic and industrial study. Also, the researchers gradually realized that the heterogeneity of individual firms, and then pay more ateentionon the internal capabilities of individual firms, thence the absorptive capacity seems to be a decisive element.
Our research regards bio-technology industry as the subject promptly.Through sending questionnaires and using factor analysis and structural equation modeling as analysis tool, we observe “proximity” – the nature of geographical proximity and organizational proximity, and how can absorptvie capacity play the interface role between external knowledge and internal capacity, and further connect the external knowledge with internal absorptive capacity and innovation performance.
The major results of study were found:
1. In the respect of external knowledge, geography proximity plays a crucial role in affecting organizational proximity and innovation performance.
2. External knowledge has a positive influence on absorptive capacity.
3. On the other hand, absorptive capacity affects the innovation permance of firms.
4. However, concerning the external knowledge, absorptive capacity results to positive but not significant on innovation performance.It implies that external knowledge directly impacts on innovation performance.
Keyword：Geographical proximity, Organizational proximity, Industerial network, Absorptive capacity, Innovation performance
參考文獻 一、中文部分
林育諄、金家禾，2006，「產業之群聚吸納能力與學習－以台灣自行車業為例」，『地理學報』，45：21-50。
孫智麗，2003，『台灣生技產業發展現況與產業創新策略』，經濟情勢暨評論季刊，9（2）：1-22。
夏鑄九譯，2001a，Castells, M.著，『網絡社會之崛起』，台北：唐山。
財團法人生物技術開發中心，2009，『台灣生技產業名錄2009』，台北：財團法人生物技術開發中心。
陳琮淵、王振寰，2009，「台灣的生技製藥產業：發展、創新與限制」，『臺灣社會學刊』，43：159-208。
黃方銘，2007，『結構方程模型理論與應用』，台北：五南。
黃昱虹，2006，「產業知識傳遞與空間外溢之研究--以台灣地區生物科技產業為例」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文：台北。
經濟部工業局，2008，『台灣生技產業新興生技公司名錄2008』，台北：經濟部工業局。
經濟部工業局，2009，『2009生技產業白皮書』，台北：經濟部工業局。
二、英文部分
Acs, Z. J. and Audretsch, D. B., 1988, “Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis,” American Economic Review, 78: 678-690.
Adler, P. S., 2001, “ Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism,” Organization Science, 12(2): 215-234.
Alcácer, J. and Chung, W., 2007, “Location Strategies and Knowledge Spillovers,” Management Science, 53(5): 760–776.
Alegre, J. Lapiedra, R., and Chiva, R., 2006, “A measurement scale for product innovation performance,” European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(4): 333-346.
Almeida, P. and Kogut, B., 1999, “Localization of knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks,” Management Science, 45(7): 905-917.
Amin, A., Thrift, N.J., 1994, “Living in the Global”, in Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development in Europe, edited by Amin A.and Thrift. N.J., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arrow, K., 1962, “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing,” The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3): 155-173.
Asheim, B. and Isaksen, A., 2002, “Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘Sticky’ and Global ‘Ubiquitous’ Knowledge,” The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1): 77-86.
Audretsch, D. B. and Stephan, P. E., 1996, “Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology,” The American Economic Review, 86(3): 641-652.
Audretsch, D. B. Lehmann, E. E. and Warning, S., 2005, “University spillovers and new firm location,” Research Policy, 34(7): 1113-1122.
Audretsch, D.B. and Feldman, M. P., 1996, “R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production,” The American Economic Review, 86(3):630-640.
Audretsch, D.B. and Feldman, M. P., 2004, “Chapter 61 Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation,” Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 4: 2713-2739.
Autant-Bernard, C., Mairesse, J., and Massard, N., “Spatial knowledge diffusion through collaborative networks,” Papers in Regional Science, 86(3): 341-350.
Baptista , R. and Swann, P., 1998, “Do firms in clusters innovate more?” Research Policy, 27(5): 524-550.
Baum, J. A. C., Calabrese, T., and Silverman,B. S., 2000, “Don`t go it alone: alliance network composition and startups` performance in Canadian biotechnology,” Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 267-294.
Boschma, R., 2005, “Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment,” Regional Studies, 39(1): 61-74.
Breschi, S. and Lissoni, F., 2001, “Knowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4): 975-1005.
Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., and Pavitt, K., 2001, “Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More Than They Make,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4): 597-621.
Caloghirou, Y. Kastelli, L., and Tsakanikas, A., 2002, “Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance?” Technovation, 24(1): 29-39.
Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R., 2006, “In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition,” Management Science, 52(1): 68-82.
Coccia, M., 2008, “Spatial mobility of knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity: analysis and measurement of the impact within the geoeconomic space,” The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(1): 105-122.
Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A., 1989, “Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D,” The Economic Journal, 99(397): 569-596.
Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A., 1990, “Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 125-152.
Cooke, P., 2002, “Regional Innovation Systems: General Findings and Some New Evidence from Biotechnology Clusters,” Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1): 133-145.
Cooke, P., 2005, “Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation: Exploring ‘Globalisation 2’—A new model of industry organization,” Research Policy, 34(8): 1128-1149.
Dahl and Pedersen, 2004, “Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: myth or reality?” Research Policy, 33: 1673-1686.
Davenport, S., 2005, “Exploring the role of proximity in SME knowledge-acquisition” Research Policy, 34(5): 683-701.
de Jong, J. P. J. and Freel, M., 2009, “Absorptive capacity and the reach of collaboration in high technology small firms,” Research Policy, 39(1): 47-54.
Debackere, K. and Veugelers, R., 2005, “The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links,” Research Policy, 34(3): 321-342.
Deeds, D., Decarolis, D., and Coombs, J., 2000, “Dynamic capabilities and new product development in high technology ventures: An empirical analysis of new biotechnology firms,” Journal of Business Venturing, 15(3): 211-229.
Eisenhardt, K.M. and Schoonhoven, C.B., 1996, “Resource-Based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms,“ Organization Science, 7(2): 136-150.
Escribano, A., Fosfuri, A., and Tribó, J. A., 2009, “Managing external knowledge flows: The moderating role of absorptive capacity,” Research Policy, 38(1): 96-105.
Este, P. D. and Patel, P., “University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry?” Research Policy, 36(9): 1295-1313.
Feldman, M. P., 1994, The Geography of Innovation, edited by Feldman, M. P., Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Feldman, M. P., 2000, “Location and innovation: the new economic geography of innovation, spillover and agglomeration,”pp373-394 in The Oxford handbook of economic geography edited by L. Clark, G. L., Gertler, M. S., and Feldman, M. P., Oxford: Oxford University Press: 373-394.
Fosfuri, A. and Tribó, J. A., 2008, “Exploring the antecedents of potential absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation performance,” Omega, 36(2):173-187.
Fritsch, M., 2001, “Co-operation in Regional Innovation Systems,” Regional Studies, 35(4): 297-307.
Geenhuizen, M. V. and Reyes-Gonzalez, L., 2007, “Does a clustered location matter for high-technology companies` performance? The case of biotechnology in the Netherlands,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(9): 1681-1696.
Gertler, M. S and Levitte Y. M., 2005, “Local Nodes in Global Networks: The Geography of Knowledge Flows in Biotechnology Innovation,” Industry & Innovation, 12(4): 487-507.
Gertler, M. S., 2003, “Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there),” Journal of Economic Geography, 3 (1): 75-99.
Gilber, A. B., McDougall, P. P., and Audretsch, D. B., 2008, “Clusters, knowledge spillovers and new venture performance: An empirical examination,” Journal of Business Venturing, 23(4): 405-422.
Gilbert, M. and Cordey-Hayes, M., 1996, “Understanding the process of knowledge transfer to achieve successful technological innovation,” Technovation, 16(6): 301-312.
Glückler, J., 2007, “Economic geography and the evolution of networks,” Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5): 619-634.
Gordon, I. R. and McCann, P., 2000, “Industrial Clusters: Complexes, Aagglomeration and /or Social Networks?” Urban Studies, 37(3): 513-532.
Giuliani, E. and Bell, M., 2007, “The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster,” Research Policy, 34(1): 47-68.
Granovetter, M., 2005, “The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1): 33-50.
Hall, L.A. and Bagchi-Sen, S., 2007, “An analysis of firm-level innovation strategies in the US biotechnology industry,” Technovation, 27(1-2): 4-14.
Haro-Domínguez, M. C., Arias-Aranda, D., Lloréns-Montes, F. J., Moreno., A. R., 2007, “ The impact of absorptive capacity on technological acquisitions engineering consulting companies,” Technovation, 27(8): 417-425.
Hervas-Oliver, J. S. and Albors-Garrigos, J., 2009, “The role of the firm`s internal and relational capabilities in clusters: when distance and embeddedness are not enough to explain innovation,” Journal of Economic Geography, 9(2): 263-283.
Howells, J. R. L., 2002, “Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography,” Urban Studies, 39(5-6): 871-884.
Jaffe, A. B., 1989, “Real Effects of Academic Research,” The American Economic Review, 79(5): 957-970.
Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., and Henderson, R., 1993, “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 577-598.
Jones, G. K., Lanctot, A., and Teegen, H. J. 2001, “Determinants and performance impacts of external technology acquisition,” Journal of Business Venturing, 16(3): 255-289.
Kline, S. J. and Rosenberg N., 1986, “An Overview of Innovation” , pp. 275-305 in The Positive Sum Strategy, Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, edited by Lindau, R. and Rosenberg, N., Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Knoben, J. Oerlemans L.A.G., 2006, “Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review, International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(2): 71-89.
Krugman, P., 1991, “Increasing returns and economic geography,” Journal of Political Economy, 99(3): 483-499.
Lane, P.J. and Lubatkin, M., 1998, “Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interorganizational Learning,” Strategic Management Journal, 19(5): 461-477.
Liao, S. H. and Wu, C. C., Hu, D. C., and Tsui, K. A., 2010, “Relationships between knowledge acquisition, absorptive capacity and innovation capability: an empirical study onTaiwan’s financial and manufacturing industries,” Journal of Information Science, 36(1): 19-35.
Liebeskind, J. P., Oliver A. L., Zucker L., and Brewer, M., 1996, “Social Networks, learning, and flexibility: sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms,” Organization Science, 7(4): 428-443.
Lindelöf, P. and Löfsten, H., 2004, “Proximity as a Resource Base for Competitive Advantage: University–Industry Links for Technology Transfer,” The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3-4): 311-326.
Luukkonen, T., 2005, “Variability in organisational forms of biotechnology firms,” Research Policy, 34(4): 555-570.
Maggioni, M. A. and Uberti, T. E., 2009, “Knowledge networks across Europe: which distance matters?” The Annals of Regional Science, 43(3): 691-720.
Maggioni, M. A., Nosvelli, M., and Uberti, T. E., 2007, “Space versus networks in the geography of innovation: A European analysis,” Papers in Regional Science, 86(3): 471-493.
Martin, R. and Sunley, P., 2003, ” Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea?” Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1): 5-35.
Maskell, P. and Malmberg, A., 2006, “Localized Learning Revisited,” Growth and Change, 37(1): 1-18.
Moodysson, J. and Jonsson, O., 2007, “Knowledge Collaboration and Proximity: The Spatial Organization of Biotech Innovation Projects,” European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(2): 115-131.
Oerlemans, L. and Meeus, M., 2005, “Do organizational and spatial proximity impact on firm performance?” Regional Studies, 39(1): 89-104.
Owen-Smith, J. and Powell, W. W., 2004, “Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community,” Organization Science, 15(1): 5-21.
Perkmann, M. and Walsh,K., 2007, “University-industry relationships and open innovation: towards a research agenda,” International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4): 259-280.
Pisano, G. P., 1990, “The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 153-176.
Poon, J. P. H., Hsu, J. Y., and Jeongwook, S., 2005, “The geography of learning and knowledge acquisition among Asian latecomers,” Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4): 541-559.
Powell, W. W., 2003, “Neither market nor hierarchy,” pp315-330 in The sociology of organizations: classic, contemporary, and critical readings, edited by Handel, M. J., Boston: Butterworth Heinemann.
Rosenkopf, L. and Almeida, P., 2003,” Overcoming Local Search through Alliances and Mobility,” Management Science, 49(6):751-766.
Saxenian, A., 1994, “Regional Advantage,” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schoenmakers, W. and Duysters, G., 2006, “Learning in strategic technology alliances,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(2): 245-264.
Schumann, P. A., Prestwood, D. C., Tong, A. H. and Vanston, J. H., 1994, Innovation: straight path to quality customer delight and competitive advantage, New York：Teacher College Press.
Serarols i Tarrés, C., Jesselyn C., M., and Spohn, D., 2008, “A transaction cost approach to analysing industrial districts,” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(2): 235-252.
Sorenson, O., 2003, “Social networks and industrial geography,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13(5): 513-527.
Souitaris, V., 2001, “External communication determinants of innovation in the context of a newly industrialized country: a comparison of objective and perceptual results from Greece,” Technovation, 21(1): 25-34.
Stuart, T. and Sorenson, O., 2003, “The geography of opportunity: spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms,” Research Policy, 32(2): 229-253.
Su, Y. S. and Hung, L. C., 2009, “Spontaneous vs. policy-driven: The origin and evolution of the biotechnology cluster,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(5): 608-619.
Teece, D. J., 1992, “Competition, cooperation, and innovation: Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 18(1): 1-25.
Thornhill, S., 2006, “Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high- and low-technology regimes,” Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5):687-703.
Torre, A. and Gilly, J.P P., 2000, “On the analytical dimension of proximity dynamics,” Regional Studies, 34( 2): 169–180.
Torre, A., 2008, “On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission,” Regional Studies, 42(6): 869–889.
Vega-Jurado, J., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., Fernández-de-Lucio, L., and Manjarrés-Henríquez, L., 2008, “The effect of external and internal factors on firms’ product innovation,” Research Policy, 37(4): 616-632.
Zahra, S. A. and George, G., 2002, “Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension,” Academy of management, 27(2): 182-203.
Zeng, S. N., Xie, X. M., and Tam, C.M., “Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs,” Technovation, 30(3): 181-194.
三、網路資料
製藥工業同業公會網站，2010，http://www.tpma.org.tw/，取用日期：2010年3月15日。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
地政研究所
97257020
98
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097257020
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 邊泰明zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳泓汝zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 陳泓汝zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned 3-Sep-2013 14:51:23 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 3-Sep-2013 14:51:23 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-Sep-2013 14:51:23 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0097257020en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59818-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 地政研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97257020zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 98zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 知識經濟的時代，創新已成為廠商競爭優勢的主要來源。知識的創造、傳遞、轉化和應用，促成廠商創新活動的產生。同時，連結地域空間與廠商創新績效的研究，已成為近代區域經濟與產業發展的重要議題。又，研究者逐漸意識到廠商個體的異質性，進而探求個別廠商的內部能力，吸收能力即成為研究焦點之一。
基此，本研究以全台灣生物技術產業為研究對象，透過廠商問卷之發放，運用因素分析與結構方程模型為分析工具，探討鄰近性－地理鄰近性和組織鄰近性的內涵，以及吸收能力如何扮演外部知識與廠商內部能力的介面，並結合外部知識、內部吸收能力與創新績效之影響路徑。
所得結果如下：
1.從外部知識層面，地理鄰近性扮演重要角色。對於組織鄰近性、創新績效有正面影響效果。其中，組織鄰近性隱含了組織網絡與社會網絡的成分；
2.觀察外部知識與內部能力的連結，外部知識獲取對於吸收能力有正面影響效果；
3.吸收能力對於創新績效亦有正向影響關係；
4.然而，考量到外部知識因素時，吸收能力對於創新績效的效果轉為正向卻不顯著，外部知識直接影響創新績效。

關鍵字：地理鄰近性、組織鄰近性、產業網絡、吸收能力、創新績效		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In the knowledge-based economy, innovation has become a key source of firms’ competitive advantage.The process of knowledge creation, transmission, transformation and application promotes the innovative activities. Meanwhile, the link geographical proximity and innovation performance of firms has become a modern issue of regional economic and industrial study. Also, the researchers gradually realized that the heterogeneity of individual firms, and then pay more ateentionon the internal capabilities of individual firms, thence the absorptive capacity seems to be a decisive element.
Our research regards bio-technology industry as the subject promptly.Through sending questionnaires and using factor analysis and structural equation modeling as analysis tool, we observe “proximity” – the nature of geographical proximity and organizational proximity, and how can absorptvie capacity play the interface role between external knowledge and internal capacity, and further connect the external knowledge with internal absorptive capacity and innovation performance.
The major results of study were found:
1. In the respect of external knowledge, geography proximity plays a crucial role in affecting organizational proximity and innovation performance.
2. External knowledge has a positive influence on absorptive capacity.
3. On the other hand, absorptive capacity affects the innovation permance of firms.
4. However, concerning the external knowledge, absorptive capacity results to positive but not significant on innovation performance.It implies that external knowledge directly impacts on innovation performance.
Keyword：Geographical proximity, Organizational proximity, Industerial network, Absorptive capacity, Innovation performance		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究範疇與研究內容 4
第三節 研究方法與研究流程 6
第二章 相關理論與文獻回顧 9
第一節 鄰近性與創新 9
第二節 吸收能力 22
第三節 小結 28
第三章 台灣地區生物技術產業現況分析 31
第一節 生技產業之定義 31
第二節 生技產業之發展特性 32
第三節 生技產業之發展現況 34
第四節 生技產業發展之困境 38
第四章 研究設計 39
第一節 研究架構與研究假設 39
第二節 研究變數與問卷設計 41
第三節 研究對象與資料收集 45
第四節 實證研究方法 47
第五章 實證結果與分析 51
第一節 敘述性資料統計 51
第二節 變數與構面建立 54
第三節 廠商統計變數對主要變數之差異分析 57
第四節 廠商鄰近性、吸收能力與創新績效之關係模式 60
第六章 結論與建議 73
第一節 結論 73
第二節 建議 76
參考文獻 79
附錄 88
附錄一 生技廠商調查問卷 88		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 2227555 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097257020en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 地理鄰近性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 組織鄰近性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 產業網絡zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 吸收能力zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 創新績效zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) geographical proximityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) organizational proximityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) industrial networken_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) abosrptive capacityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) innovation performanceen_US
dc.title (題名) 鄰近性、吸收能力與廠商創新績效之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Proximity, absorptive capacity, and innovation performance of firmsen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文部分
林育諄、金家禾，2006，「產業之群聚吸納能力與學習－以台灣自行車業為例」，『地理學報』，45：21-50。
孫智麗，2003，『台灣生技產業發展現況與產業創新策略』，經濟情勢暨評論季刊，9（2）：1-22。
夏鑄九譯，2001a，Castells, M.著，『網絡社會之崛起』，台北：唐山。
財團法人生物技術開發中心，2009，『台灣生技產業名錄2009』，台北：財團法人生物技術開發中心。
陳琮淵、王振寰，2009，「台灣的生技製藥產業：發展、創新與限制」，『臺灣社會學刊』，43：159-208。
黃方銘，2007，『結構方程模型理論與應用』，台北：五南。
黃昱虹，2006，「產業知識傳遞與空間外溢之研究--以台灣地區生物科技產業為例」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文：台北。
經濟部工業局，2008，『台灣生技產業新興生技公司名錄2008』，台北：經濟部工業局。
經濟部工業局，2009，『2009生技產業白皮書』，台北：經濟部工業局。
二、英文部分
Acs, Z. J. and Audretsch, D. B., 1988, “Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis,” American Economic Review, 78: 678-690.
Adler, P. S., 2001, “ Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism,” Organization Science, 12(2): 215-234.
Alcácer, J. and Chung, W., 2007, “Location Strategies and Knowledge Spillovers,” Management Science, 53(5): 760–776.
Alegre, J. Lapiedra, R., and Chiva, R., 2006, “A measurement scale for product innovation performance,” European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(4): 333-346.
Almeida, P. and Kogut, B., 1999, “Localization of knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks,” Management Science, 45(7): 905-917.
Amin, A., Thrift, N.J., 1994, “Living in the Global”, in Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development in Europe, edited by Amin A.and Thrift. N.J., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arrow, K., 1962, “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing,” The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3): 155-173.
Asheim, B. and Isaksen, A., 2002, “Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘Sticky’ and Global ‘Ubiquitous’ Knowledge,” The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1): 77-86.
Audretsch, D. B. and Stephan, P. E., 1996, “Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology,” The American Economic Review, 86(3): 641-652.
Audretsch, D. B. Lehmann, E. E. and Warning, S., 2005, “University spillovers and new firm location,” Research Policy, 34(7): 1113-1122.
Audretsch, D.B. and Feldman, M. P., 1996, “R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production,” The American Economic Review, 86(3):630-640.
Audretsch, D.B. and Feldman, M. P., 2004, “Chapter 61 Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation,” Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 4: 2713-2739.
Autant-Bernard, C., Mairesse, J., and Massard, N., “Spatial knowledge diffusion through collaborative networks,” Papers in Regional Science, 86(3): 341-350.
Baptista , R. and Swann, P., 1998, “Do firms in clusters innovate more?” Research Policy, 27(5): 524-550.
Baum, J. A. C., Calabrese, T., and Silverman,B. S., 2000, “Don`t go it alone: alliance network composition and startups` performance in Canadian biotechnology,” Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 267-294.
Boschma, R., 2005, “Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment,” Regional Studies, 39(1): 61-74.
Breschi, S. and Lissoni, F., 2001, “Knowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4): 975-1005.
Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., and Pavitt, K., 2001, “Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More Than They Make,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4): 597-621.
Caloghirou, Y. Kastelli, L., and Tsakanikas, A., 2002, “Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance?” Technovation, 24(1): 29-39.
Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R., 2006, “In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition,” Management Science, 52(1): 68-82.
Coccia, M., 2008, “Spatial mobility of knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity: analysis and measurement of the impact within the geoeconomic space,” The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(1): 105-122.
Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A., 1989, “Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D,” The Economic Journal, 99(397): 569-596.
Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A., 1990, “Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 125-152.
Cooke, P., 2002, “Regional Innovation Systems: General Findings and Some New Evidence from Biotechnology Clusters,” Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1): 133-145.
Cooke, P., 2005, “Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation: Exploring ‘Globalisation 2’—A new model of industry organization,” Research Policy, 34(8): 1128-1149.
Dahl and Pedersen, 2004, “Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: myth or reality?” Research Policy, 33: 1673-1686.
Davenport, S., 2005, “Exploring the role of proximity in SME knowledge-acquisition” Research Policy, 34(5): 683-701.
de Jong, J. P. J. and Freel, M., 2009, “Absorptive capacity and the reach of collaboration in high technology small firms,” Research Policy, 39(1): 47-54.
Debackere, K. and Veugelers, R., 2005, “The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links,” Research Policy, 34(3): 321-342.
Deeds, D., Decarolis, D., and Coombs, J., 2000, “Dynamic capabilities and new product development in high technology ventures: An empirical analysis of new biotechnology firms,” Journal of Business Venturing, 15(3): 211-229.
Eisenhardt, K.M. and Schoonhoven, C.B., 1996, “Resource-Based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms,“ Organization Science, 7(2): 136-150.
Escribano, A., Fosfuri, A., and Tribó, J. A., 2009, “Managing external knowledge flows: The moderating role of absorptive capacity,” Research Policy, 38(1): 96-105.
Este, P. D. and Patel, P., “University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry?” Research Policy, 36(9): 1295-1313.
Feldman, M. P., 1994, The Geography of Innovation, edited by Feldman, M. P., Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Feldman, M. P., 2000, “Location and innovation: the new economic geography of innovation, spillover and agglomeration,”pp373-394 in The Oxford handbook of economic geography edited by L. Clark, G. L., Gertler, M. S., and Feldman, M. P., Oxford: Oxford University Press: 373-394.
Fosfuri, A. and Tribó, J. A., 2008, “Exploring the antecedents of potential absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation performance,” Omega, 36(2):173-187.
Fritsch, M., 2001, “Co-operation in Regional Innovation Systems,” Regional Studies, 35(4): 297-307.
Geenhuizen, M. V. and Reyes-Gonzalez, L., 2007, “Does a clustered location matter for high-technology companies` performance? The case of biotechnology in the Netherlands,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(9): 1681-1696.
Gertler, M. S and Levitte Y. M., 2005, “Local Nodes in Global Networks: The Geography of Knowledge Flows in Biotechnology Innovation,” Industry & Innovation, 12(4): 487-507.
Gertler, M. S., 2003, “Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there),” Journal of Economic Geography, 3 (1): 75-99.
Gilber, A. B., McDougall, P. P., and Audretsch, D. B., 2008, “Clusters, knowledge spillovers and new venture performance: An empirical examination,” Journal of Business Venturing, 23(4): 405-422.
Gilbert, M. and Cordey-Hayes, M., 1996, “Understanding the process of knowledge transfer to achieve successful technological innovation,” Technovation, 16(6): 301-312.
Glückler, J., 2007, “Economic geography and the evolution of networks,” Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5): 619-634.
Gordon, I. R. and McCann, P., 2000, “Industrial Clusters: Complexes, Aagglomeration and /or Social Networks?” Urban Studies, 37(3): 513-532.
Giuliani, E. and Bell, M., 2007, “The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster,” Research Policy, 34(1): 47-68.
Granovetter, M., 2005, “The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1): 33-50.
Hall, L.A. and Bagchi-Sen, S., 2007, “An analysis of firm-level innovation strategies in the US biotechnology industry,” Technovation, 27(1-2): 4-14.
Haro-Domínguez, M. C., Arias-Aranda, D., Lloréns-Montes, F. J., Moreno., A. R., 2007, “ The impact of absorptive capacity on technological acquisitions engineering consulting companies,” Technovation, 27(8): 417-425.
Hervas-Oliver, J. S. and Albors-Garrigos, J., 2009, “The role of the firm`s internal and relational capabilities in clusters: when distance and embeddedness are not enough to explain innovation,” Journal of Economic Geography, 9(2): 263-283.
Howells, J. R. L., 2002, “Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography,” Urban Studies, 39(5-6): 871-884.
Jaffe, A. B., 1989, “Real Effects of Academic Research,” The American Economic Review, 79(5): 957-970.
Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., and Henderson, R., 1993, “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 577-598.
Jones, G. K., Lanctot, A., and Teegen, H. J. 2001, “Determinants and performance impacts of external technology acquisition,” Journal of Business Venturing, 16(3): 255-289.
Kline, S. J. and Rosenberg N., 1986, “An Overview of Innovation” , pp. 275-305 in The Positive Sum Strategy, Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, edited by Lindau, R. and Rosenberg, N., Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Knoben, J. Oerlemans L.A.G., 2006, “Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review, International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(2): 71-89.
Krugman, P., 1991, “Increasing returns and economic geography,” Journal of Political Economy, 99(3): 483-499.
Lane, P.J. and Lubatkin, M., 1998, “Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interorganizational Learning,” Strategic Management Journal, 19(5): 461-477.
Liao, S. H. and Wu, C. C., Hu, D. C., and Tsui, K. A., 2010, “Relationships between knowledge acquisition, absorptive capacity and innovation capability: an empirical study onTaiwan’s financial and manufacturing industries,” Journal of Information Science, 36(1): 19-35.
Liebeskind, J. P., Oliver A. L., Zucker L., and Brewer, M., 1996, “Social Networks, learning, and flexibility: sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms,” Organization Science, 7(4): 428-443.
Lindelöf, P. and Löfsten, H., 2004, “Proximity as a Resource Base for Competitive Advantage: University–Industry Links for Technology Transfer,” The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3-4): 311-326.
Luukkonen, T., 2005, “Variability in organisational forms of biotechnology firms,” Research Policy, 34(4): 555-570.
Maggioni, M. A. and Uberti, T. E., 2009, “Knowledge networks across Europe: which distance matters?” The Annals of Regional Science, 43(3): 691-720.
Maggioni, M. A., Nosvelli, M., and Uberti, T. E., 2007, “Space versus networks in the geography of innovation: A European analysis,” Papers in Regional Science, 86(3): 471-493.
Martin, R. and Sunley, P., 2003, ” Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea?” Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1): 5-35.
Maskell, P. and Malmberg, A., 2006, “Localized Learning Revisited,” Growth and Change, 37(1): 1-18.
Moodysson, J. and Jonsson, O., 2007, “Knowledge Collaboration and Proximity: The Spatial Organization of Biotech Innovation Projects,” European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(2): 115-131.
Oerlemans, L. and Meeus, M., 2005, “Do organizational and spatial proximity impact on firm performance?” Regional Studies, 39(1): 89-104.
Owen-Smith, J. and Powell, W. W., 2004, “Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community,” Organization Science, 15(1): 5-21.
Perkmann, M. and Walsh,K., 2007, “University-industry relationships and open innovation: towards a research agenda,” International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4): 259-280.
Pisano, G. P., 1990, “The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 153-176.
Poon, J. P. H., Hsu, J. Y., and Jeongwook, S., 2005, “The geography of learning and knowledge acquisition among Asian latecomers,” Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4): 541-559.
Powell, W. W., 2003, “Neither market nor hierarchy,” pp315-330 in The sociology of organizations: classic, contemporary, and critical readings, edited by Handel, M. J., Boston: Butterworth Heinemann.
Rosenkopf, L. and Almeida, P., 2003,” Overcoming Local Search through Alliances and Mobility,” Management Science, 49(6):751-766.
Saxenian, A., 1994, “Regional Advantage,” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schoenmakers, W. and Duysters, G., 2006, “Learning in strategic technology alliances,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(2): 245-264.
Schumann, P. A., Prestwood, D. C., Tong, A. H. and Vanston, J. H., 1994, Innovation: straight path to quality customer delight and competitive advantage, New York：Teacher College Press.
Serarols i Tarrés, C., Jesselyn C., M., and Spohn, D., 2008, “A transaction cost approach to analysing industrial districts,” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(2): 235-252.
Sorenson, O., 2003, “Social networks and industrial geography,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13(5): 513-527.
Souitaris, V., 2001, “External communication determinants of innovation in the context of a newly industrialized country: a comparison of objective and perceptual results from Greece,” Technovation, 21(1): 25-34.
Stuart, T. and Sorenson, O., 2003, “The geography of opportunity: spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms,” Research Policy, 32(2): 229-253.
Su, Y. S. and Hung, L. C., 2009, “Spontaneous vs. policy-driven: The origin and evolution of the biotechnology cluster,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(5): 608-619.
Teece, D. J., 1992, “Competition, cooperation, and innovation: Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 18(1): 1-25.
Thornhill, S., 2006, “Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high- and low-technology regimes,” Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5):687-703.
Torre, A. and Gilly, J.P P., 2000, “On the analytical dimension of proximity dynamics,” Regional Studies, 34( 2): 169–180.
Torre, A., 2008, “On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission,” Regional Studies, 42(6): 869–889.
Vega-Jurado, J., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., Fernández-de-Lucio, L., and Manjarrés-Henríquez, L., 2008, “The effect of external and internal factors on firms’ product innovation,” Research Policy, 37(4): 616-632.
Zahra, S. A. and George, G., 2002, “Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension,” Academy of management, 27(2): 182-203.
Zeng, S. N., Xie, X. M., and Tam, C.M., “Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs,” Technovation, 30(3): 181-194.
三、網路資料
製藥工業同業公會網站，2010，http://www.tpma.org.tw/，取用日期：2010年3月15日。		zh_TW