1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Foreign Languages and Literature
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 無聊真無趣嗎？：從成功與不成功國中英語學習者的角度探索社會建構主義下無聊情緒對第二語言學習的影響
Is Boredom Boring?: Understanding Social Construction of Boredom and its influence on L2 Learning from the Perspectives of Successful and Unsuccessful Junior High School Students
作者 陳鳳吟
Chen, Feng Yin
貢獻者 黃怡萍
Huang, Yi Ping
陳鳳吟
Chen, Feng Yin
關鍵詞 英語教學
學習情緒
無聊
成功與不成功學習者
國中生
English learning
learning emotions
boredom
successful and unsuccessful learners
junior high school students
日期 2015
上傳時間 24-Aug-2015 09:52:07 (UTC+8)
摘要 不同於其他情意因素的成熟發展(Horwitz, Horwitz, & Cope, 1986; Dörnyei, 1998; Gardner, 2001; Gardner & MacIntyre, 1993)，無聊此情意因素在語言學習的領域中一直以來皆為被忽略的對象。過去研究顯示，無聊已確實存在於課室情境中(Bown & White, 2010; Goetz, Pekrun, Hall, & Hagg, 2006)；其重要性也已開始漸漸受到重視(Dörnyei, 2001)。然而，針對無聊與語言學習作為研究對象的相關文獻卻依然十分匱乏。有鑑於此，本研究大膽地做了嘗試，採用社會建構主義為理論基礎，透過觀察一群國中英語學習者在課室內的學習經驗，試圖找出無聊在第二語言習得領域中的定義以及建構出課室無聊情緒的互動形式。採用質化個案研究為執行方法，此一研究一共邀請了四位國中生；包含兩位成功學習者及兩位不成功學習者，並透過訪談與課室觀察來收集資料，最後根據Glaser and Strauss (1967)的對比分析法彙整原始資料並得出研究結果。
關於第一個研究方向，結果顯示四位學生共同將第二語言習得之無聊情緒定義為一種「對於學習英文感到無意義的情緒」。另一方面，此兩種分類的學習者也各自給了無聊不同的定義；對於成功的學習者來說，無聊為「一種必須忍受以求獲得獎勵的情緒」，而不成功的學習者對無聊的定義則為「一種因為學習障礙而無法克服的情緒」。此外，針對第二個研究問題，此研究的結果顯示成功與不成功學習者所經歷的相似無聊情緒是受到課堂內互動交流以及教學方法對學生來說是否有意義所影響。另一方面，無聊的情形分別發生於成功與不成功學習者身上的影響因素則受到學生對於接收
訊息的困難度評價以及對自我英語程度的認知所影響。
為了幫助學生避免無聊所造成的學習不良，根據所得出的研究結果本研究提出了下列建議以供語言教學教師參考：1. 提高課程設計的多樣性；2. 運用生活化的教學方式；3. 促進正面的課堂互動；4. 注意活動困難度的設計；5. 幫助學生提高學習動機。
Unlike other affective emotions which have been developed maturely (Horwitz, Horwitz, & Cope, 1986; Dörnyei, 1998; Gardner, 2001; Gardner & MacIntyre, 1993), learning boredom has long been ignored in the area of language learning and teaching. Previous literature has pointed out the existence (Bown & White, 2010; Goetz, Pekrun, Hall, & Hagg, 2006) and its significance in the field of L2 learning and teaching (Dörnyei, 2001); however, limited research has concerned with this issue. Therefore, taking a bold step, this study aimed to find out the proper definitions for L2 learning boredom and figure out the interactive patterns co-constructed students’ L2 boredom in the classroom setting with the social constructional perspective of emotion. Employing a qualitative case study as the research approach, the researcher invited four junior high school students who were in half classified into the successful and unsuccessful learners as the participants for the present study. Data for analysis were collected from multiple sources, including three types of interviews: (a) semi-structured interview, (b) stimulated-recall interviews, and (c) focus-group interviews, and classroom observation. Through analyzing the data by adopting Glaser and Strauss’ (1967) constant comparative method.
Regarding the first research direction, the results showed that the students defined L2 boredom similarly as the feeling of meaninglessness in learning English while differently as an emotion must be borne to expect the rewards (by the successful students) and an emotion cannot be overcome due to learning obstacles (by the unsuccessful students). In terms of the second interest of this study, it was also found that the similar pattern resulting in classroom L2 boredom was influenced by the interactive flow in the L2 class and the extent to which meaningful approaches were applied. On the other hand, L2 boredom happened differently to the two categories of students could be attributed to the interplay between the difficulty degrees of given information and the students’ self-perception of L2 capability.
Based on the findings, this study yielded some implications for language teachers concerning the affective domain of the students. Suggestions including increasing the variety of class designs, using authentic teaching approaches, promoting positive class interactions, controlling the challenge degree of the materials and activities skillfully, and helping students increase L2 motivation were claimed helpful to decrease the negative impact L2 boredom could make on the students’ L2 learning.
參考文獻 Abraham, R. G., & Vann, R. J. (1987). Strategies of two
language learners: A case study. In A. Wenden & J.
Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning
(pp. 85–102). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ahmed, S.M.S. (1990). Psychometric properties of the
boredom proneness scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills,
71, 963–966.
Aragão, R. (2011). Beliefs and emotions in foreign
language learning. System, 39(3),302-313.
Bailey, J.P., Thackery, R.J., Pearl, J., & Parish, T.S.
(1976). Boredom and arousal: Comparison of tasks
differing in visual complexity. Perceptual and Motor
Skills, 43, 141-142.
Barbalet, J.M. (1999). Boredom and Social Meaning. The
British Journal of Sociology, 50 (4), 631-646.
Belton, T., & Priyadharshini, E. (2007). Boredom and
schooling: A cross-disciplinary exploration. Cambridge
Journal of Education, 37, 579–597.
Berlyne, D.E. (1960). Conflict, Arousal and Curiosity.
New York: McGraw-Hill.
Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant
comparative method in the analysis of qualitative
interviews. Quality and Quantity, 36, 391-409
Bown, J., & White, C. (2010). A social and cognitive
approach to affect in SLA. International Review of
Applied Linguistics in Language Learning, (48)4, 331-
353.
Brissett, D. & Snow, R.P. (1993). Boredom: Where the
future isn’t. Symbolic Interaction, 16, 237–56.
Bowers, R. (1980). Verbal behavior in the language
teaching classroom. University of Reading, England:
Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis.
Caldwell, L. L., & Smith, E. A. (1995). Health behaviors
of leisure alienated youth. Society and Leisure, 18,
209 – 218.
Caldwell, L. L., Darling, N. D., Payne, L. L. & Dowdy, B.
(1999). Why are you bored?: An examination of
psychological and social control causes of boredom
among adolescents. Journal of Leisure Re-search,
31(2), 103-122.
Caldwell, L. L., & Darling, N. D. (1999). Leisure
context, parental control, and resistance to peer
pressure as predictors of adolescent partying and
substance use: An ecological perspective. Journal of
Leisure Research, 31, 57–77.
Carspecken, P.F. (1996). Critical ethnography in
educational research: A theoretical and practical
guide. New York: Routledge.
Chambers, G. (1993). Taking the “de” out of demotivation.
Language Learning Journal, 7, 13-16.
Chambers, G. N. (1998). Pupils’ perceptions of the
foreign language learning experience. Language
Teaching Research, 2(3), 231-259.
Chapelle, C., & Jamieson, J. (1988). Research trends in
computer-assisted language learning. In M. Pennington
(Ed.), Teaching languages with computers (pp. 47-59).
La Jolla, CA: Athelstan.
Creswell, J.W. (2002). Educational Research: Planning,
Conducting, and Evaluation Quantitative and
Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
Education Inc.
Cohen, A. (1987). Using verbal reports in research on
language learning. In C. Færch and G. Kasper (eds),
Introspection in Second Language Research. Clevedon:
Multilingual Matters.
Conrad, P. (1997). It’s Boring: Notes on the Meanings of
Boredom in Everyday Life. Qualitative Sociology 20(4),
465–475.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1994). Interest and the quality of
experience in classrooms. European Journal of
Phychology of Education, 9, 251-270.
Damrad-Frye, R., & Laird, J.D. (1989). The experience of
boredom: The role of the self-perception of attention.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2),
315–320.
Darden, D. & Marks, A. (1999). Boredom: a socially
disvalued emotion. Sociological Spectrum,19(1), 13–37.
Dawley, H. (2006). In praise of boredom, sweet boredom: a
researcher believes it can be good for us, May 1.
Available online at: www.medialifemagazine.com2artman/publish/article_4421.asp (accessed 22 February 2007).
Denny, T. (1978). Booklet I. Some still do: River Acres,
Texas. In R. E. Stake & J. Easely (Eds.), Case studies
in science education (National Science Foundation
Report SE 78,74, 2 Volumes). Washington, D.C.: U.S.
Government Printing Office.
Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign
language learning. Language Teaching, 31 (3), 117-135.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation.
Essex, UK: Pearson.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Creating a Motivating Classroom
Environment. The University of Nottingham, UK.
Farmer, R., & Sundberg, N.D. (1986). Boredom proneness—
The development and correlates of a new scale. Journal
of Personality Assessment, 50(1), 4–17.
Ferrell, J. (2004). ‘The Only Possible Adventure:
Edgework and Anarchy’, in Stephen Lyng (ed.) Edgework:
The Sociology of Risk-taking. London: Routledge,
forthcoming.
Firestone, W. A. (1987). Meaning in method: The rhetoric
of quantitative and qualitative research. Educational
Researcher, 16(7), 16-21.
Fisher, C. (1993) Boredom at work: a neglected concept,
Human Relations, 46(3),395–417.
Gan, Z., Humphreys, G., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2004).
Understanding successful and unsuccessful EFL students
in Chinese universities. The Modern Language Journal,
88, 229-244.
Gardner, R.C. (2001). Integrative motivation and second
language acquisition. In Z.D¨ornyei & R. Schmidt
(Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition
(pp. 1–19). Honolulu: Second Language Teaching and
Curriculum Center,University of Hawai’i at Manoa.
Gardner, R.C., & MacIntyre, P.D. (1993). A learner’s
contributions to second language acquisition. Part II.
Affective variables. Language Teaching 26, 1–11.
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall
methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Gaylin, W. (1979). Feelings: Our Vital Signs. New York:
Ballantine Books.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of
grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.
Chicago: Aldine.
Goodsman, D. (1992). Summerhill: theory and practice.
Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of East Anglia,
Norwich.
Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at
learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL
Quarterly, 29, 261–297.
Goetz T., & Frenzel, A. C. (2006). Relations between
achievement emotions and self-concept of ability in
mathematics (Technical Report). University of Munich:
Department of Psychology.
Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., Hall, N. C., & Haag, L. (2006).
Academic emotions from a socio- cognitive perspective:
Antecedents and domain specificity of students’
affect in the context of Latin instruction. British
Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 289–308.
Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., Hall, N. C., &
Lu¨dtke, O. (2007). Between- and within-domain
relations of students’ academic emotions. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 99, 715–733.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual. Harmondsworth:
Penguin.
Gordon, A., Wilkinson, R., McGown, A. & Jovanska, S.
(1997). The psychometric properties of the Boredom
Proneness Scale: an examination of validity.
Psychological Studies 42, 85-97.
Harris, M. (2000). Correlates and characteristics of
boredom proneness and boredom. Journal of Applied
Social Psychology, 30(3). 576–598.
Healy, S. (1984). Boredom, self and culture. Cranbury,
NJ, Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
Herriott, R.E. & Firestone, W.A. (1983). Multiple
qualitative policy research: Optimizing description
and generalizability. Educational Researcher, 12, 14-
19.
Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Leavy, P. (2011). Vie practice of
qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications.
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986).
Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language
Journal 70, l25-l32.
Huang, Jianliang. (2010). Problems in the connection
between primary school and junior high school English
teaching and their counter-measures. Basic Education
Research, (2), 28-30.
Imai, Y. (2010). Emotions in SLA: New Insights from
collaborative learning for an EFL classroom. The
Modern Language Journal, (94)2, 278-292.
Iso-Ahola, S.E. & Crowley E.D. (1991). Adolescent
substance abuse and leisure boredom. Journal of
Leisure Research, 23, pp. 260–271.
Jackson, P. (1968). Life in Classrooms. New York: Holt,
Rinehart & Winston.
Kemper, T. D. (1978). A Social Interactional Theory of
Emotions. New York: Wiley.
Klapp, O. E. (1986). Overload and Boredom: Essays in the
Quality of Life in the Information Society. New York:
Greenwood.
Kracauer, S. (1995). Boredom, in: T. Levin (Trans. &
Ed.), The mass ornament: Wiemar essays. (Cambridge,
MA, Harvard University Press), 75–88.
Krueger, R., & Casey, M. (2000). Focus Groups: A
Practical Guide for Applied Research (3rd ed.).
Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Larson, R. W., & Richards, M. H. (1991). Boredom in the
middle school years: Blaming schools versus blaming
students. American Journal of Education, 99, 418-443.
Lederman, L.C. (1990). Assessing educational
effectiveness: the focus-group interview as a
technique for data collection. Communication
Education, 39, 117-127.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic
inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Long, M. (1980). Inside the “black box”: Methodological
issues in classroom research on language learning.
Language Learning, 30, 1-42.
Lynch, O. (1990). Divine Passions: The Social
Construction of Emotions in India.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
MacIntyre, P. (2002). Motivation, anxiety and emotion in
second language acquisition. In Peter Robinson (ed.),
Individual differences and instructed language
learning, (pp. 45–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Maroldo, G.K. (1986). Shyness, boredom, and grade point
average among college students. Psychological Reports,
59, 385-398.
Martin, M., Sadlo, G., & Stew, G. (2006). The phenomenon
of boredom. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3,
193-211.
Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational
Researcher, 17(2), 13-17.
Meaningless [Def. 2]. (2015). Merriam-Webster Online. In
Merriam-Webster. Retrieved May 5, 2015, from
http://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/meaningless
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case
study applications in education. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
McGrath, I. (2002) Materials Evaluation for Language
Teaching Edinburgh Textbooks in Applied Linguistics,
Edinburgh University Press.
Mikulas, W.L., & Vodanovich, S.J. (1993). The essence of
boredom. The Psychological Record, 43, 3-12.
Pekrun, R., Goetz T., & Titz, W., & Perry, R.P. (2002).
Academic emotions in students self-regulated learning
and achievement. A programme of qualitative and
quantitative research. Educational Psychologist 37(2).
91–105.
O’Hanlon, J.F. (1981). Boredom: practical consequences
and a theory. Acta Psychologica, 49, 53-82.
Parrott, W.G. & Harré, R. (1996). Overview. In Harré R. &
Parrott W.G. (Eds.). The emotions: The social, cultural
and biological dimensions. pp. 1-20. London: Sage.
Patterson, I., & Pegg, S. (1999). Adult learning on the
increase: the need for leisure studies programs to
respond accordingly. JOPERD, 70(5), 45–54
Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research
methods (2nd ed.). Newbury
Park, CA: Sage. Quindlen, A. (2002). Doing nothing is
something. Newsweek, 139(19), 76.
Robinson, W.P. (1975). Boredom at school. British Journal
of Educational Psychology, 45, 141-152.
Shaw, S. (1996). Boredom, stress and social control in
the daily activities of adolescents Journal of Leisure
Research, 28(4), 274-292.
Silverman, D. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research A
Practical Handbook. Sage: London.
Simmel, G. (1971 [1911]) ‘The Adventurer’, in D.N. Levine
(ed.) George Simmel,On Individuality and Social Forms.
Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Smith, L.M. (1978). “An Evolving Logic of Participant
Observation, Educational Ethnography and Other Case
Studies.” In L. Shulman (ed.), Review of Research in
Education. Itasca, Ill.: Peacock, 1978.
Smith, R. (1981). Boredom: A review. Human Factors, 23,
329-340.
Sommers, J. & Vodanovich, S.J. (2000). Boredom proneness:
Its relationship to psychological and physical health
symptoms. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 149-155.
Spacks, P. M. (1995). Boredom: The Literary History of a
State of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stake, R. E. (1981). Case study methodology: An
epistemological advocacy. In W. Welch. (Ed.), Case
study methodology in educational evaluation.
Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Research and Evaluation
Center.
Stake, R. E. (1994). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y.
S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research
(pp. 236-247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Vodanovich, S.J. (2003). Psychometric measures of
boredom: a review of the literature. The Journal of
Psychology, 137, 569-601.
Vodanovich, S.J. & Rupp, D.E. (1999). Are procrastinators
prone to boredom? Social Behavior and Personality, 27,
11-16.
Weaver, C. (1996). Teaching grammar in context.
Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Weinstein, C. (1991). The Classroom as a Social Context
for Learning. Annual Review of Psychology 42, 493-525.
Wen, Q., & Johnson, R. K. (1997). L2 learner variables
and English achievement: A study of tertiary-level
English majors in China. Applied Linguistics, 18, 27–
47.
Wlodkowski, R.J. (1986). Motivation and Teaching: A
Practical Guide. Washington, DC: National Education
Association.
Wright, T. (2006). Managing classroom life. In Simon
Gieve & Inés K. Miller (eds.), Understanding the
language classroom, (pp. 64–87). Hampshire, UK: P
Palgrave Macmillan.
Yin, R.K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods
(3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and
methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Zhu, B & Zhou, Y. (2012). A Study on Students` Affective
Factors in Junior High School English Teaching.
English Language Teaching, 5(7).
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學研究所
100551015
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1005510151
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 黃怡萍zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Huang, Yi Pingen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳鳳吟zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chen, Feng Yinen_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳鳳吟zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Feng Yinen_US
dc.date (日期) 2015en_US
dc.date.accessioned 24-Aug-2015 09:52:07 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 24-Aug-2015 09:52:07 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 24-Aug-2015 09:52:07 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G1005510151en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/77853-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 英國語文學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 100551015zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 不同於其他情意因素的成熟發展(Horwitz, Horwitz, & Cope, 1986; Dörnyei, 1998; Gardner, 2001; Gardner & MacIntyre, 1993)，無聊此情意因素在語言學習的領域中一直以來皆為被忽略的對象。過去研究顯示，無聊已確實存在於課室情境中(Bown & White, 2010; Goetz, Pekrun, Hall, & Hagg, 2006)；其重要性也已開始漸漸受到重視(Dörnyei, 2001)。然而，針對無聊與語言學習作為研究對象的相關文獻卻依然十分匱乏。有鑑於此，本研究大膽地做了嘗試，採用社會建構主義為理論基礎，透過觀察一群國中英語學習者在課室內的學習經驗，試圖找出無聊在第二語言習得領域中的定義以及建構出課室無聊情緒的互動形式。採用質化個案研究為執行方法，此一研究一共邀請了四位國中生；包含兩位成功學習者及兩位不成功學習者，並透過訪談與課室觀察來收集資料，最後根據Glaser and Strauss (1967)的對比分析法彙整原始資料並得出研究結果。
關於第一個研究方向，結果顯示四位學生共同將第二語言習得之無聊情緒定義為一種「對於學習英文感到無意義的情緒」。另一方面，此兩種分類的學習者也各自給了無聊不同的定義；對於成功的學習者來說，無聊為「一種必須忍受以求獲得獎勵的情緒」，而不成功的學習者對無聊的定義則為「一種因為學習障礙而無法克服的情緒」。此外，針對第二個研究問題，此研究的結果顯示成功與不成功學習者所經歷的相似無聊情緒是受到課堂內互動交流以及教學方法對學生來說是否有意義所影響。另一方面，無聊的情形分別發生於成功與不成功學習者身上的影響因素則受到學生對於接收
訊息的困難度評價以及對自我英語程度的認知所影響。
為了幫助學生避免無聊所造成的學習不良，根據所得出的研究結果本研究提出了下列建議以供語言教學教師參考：1. 提高課程設計的多樣性；2. 運用生活化的教學方式；3. 促進正面的課堂互動；4. 注意活動困難度的設計；5. 幫助學生提高學習動機。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Unlike other affective emotions which have been developed maturely (Horwitz, Horwitz, & Cope, 1986; Dörnyei, 1998; Gardner, 2001; Gardner & MacIntyre, 1993), learning boredom has long been ignored in the area of language learning and teaching. Previous literature has pointed out the existence (Bown & White, 2010; Goetz, Pekrun, Hall, & Hagg, 2006) and its significance in the field of L2 learning and teaching (Dörnyei, 2001); however, limited research has concerned with this issue. Therefore, taking a bold step, this study aimed to find out the proper definitions for L2 learning boredom and figure out the interactive patterns co-constructed students’ L2 boredom in the classroom setting with the social constructional perspective of emotion. Employing a qualitative case study as the research approach, the researcher invited four junior high school students who were in half classified into the successful and unsuccessful learners as the participants for the present study. Data for analysis were collected from multiple sources, including three types of interviews: (a) semi-structured interview, (b) stimulated-recall interviews, and (c) focus-group interviews, and classroom observation. Through analyzing the data by adopting Glaser and Strauss’ (1967) constant comparative method.
Regarding the first research direction, the results showed that the students defined L2 boredom similarly as the feeling of meaninglessness in learning English while differently as an emotion must be borne to expect the rewards (by the successful students) and an emotion cannot be overcome due to learning obstacles (by the unsuccessful students). In terms of the second interest of this study, it was also found that the similar pattern resulting in classroom L2 boredom was influenced by the interactive flow in the L2 class and the extent to which meaningful approaches were applied. On the other hand, L2 boredom happened differently to the two categories of students could be attributed to the interplay between the difficulty degrees of given information and the students’ self-perception of L2 capability.
Based on the findings, this study yielded some implications for language teachers concerning the affective domain of the students. Suggestions including increasing the variety of class designs, using authentic teaching approaches, promoting positive class interactions, controlling the challenge degree of the materials and activities skillfully, and helping students increase L2 motivation were claimed helpful to decrease the negative impact L2 boredom could make on the students’ L2 learning.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents Table of Contents
Acknowledgement iii
Table of Contents iv
Chinese Abstract viii
English Abstract x

Chapter One: Introduction 1
1.0 Introduction 1
1.1 Background and Rationale 1
1.2 The Purpose of the Study 3

Chapter Two: Literature Review 5
2.0 Introduction 5
2.1 Psychological Perspective 5
2.2 Social Constructional School of Thought 7
2.3 Boredom and L2 Learning and Teaching 10
2.4 Gap Identification 12
2.5 Purpose and Research Questions 14

Chapter Three: Methodology 17
3.0 Introduction 17
3.1 Research Design 17
3.2 Context and Participants 18
3.3 Data Collection and Procedure 20
3.3.1 Interviews 20

3.3.1.1 Semi-structured Interviews 21
3.3.1.2 Stimulated Recall Interviews 22
3.3.1.3 Focus-Group Interviews 23
3.3.2 Classroom Observation 25
3.3.3 Procedure for Data Collection 26
3.4 Data Analysis 28
3.5 Trustworthiness 29
3.6 Ethical Consideration 30

Chapter Four: Findings 31
4.0 Introduction 31
4.1 Definition of L2 Learning Boredom 31
4.1.1 Similar Definition of L2 Learning Boredom 31
4.1.1.1 Resistance or Surrender to the Values of the
L2 Imposed by the More Powerful Parties 32
4.1.1.1.1 Adults as the More Powerful Party 32
4.1.1.1.2 Educational System as the
More Powerful Party 37
4.1.1.1.3 The Society as the More Powerful Party 39
4.1.1.2 Helplessness to Get away from the Sameness
in L2 learning 41
4.1.1.3 Personal Dislikes for the L2 and L2 learning 44
4.1.1.3.1 Incongruent with Personal Value
Orientations 45
4.1.1.3.2 English is Contradictory to Their Personal
Identities 50
4.1.1.4 Summary: Similar Definition for L2 Learning
Boredom 52
4.1.2 Different Definitions of L2 learning boredom 54
4.1.2.1 Successful Students’ Definition 54
4.1.2.2 Unsuccessful Students’ Definition 60
4.1.2.3 Summary: Different Definition for
L2 Learning Boredom 71
4.2 The Dynamic Construction of L2 Learning Boredom 72
4.2.1 Similarities 72
4.2.1.1 Students’ Interaction with the Teacher 73
4.2.1.2 Students’ Interaction with the Peers 88
4.2.1.3 Students’ Interaction with the
Learning Materials 100
4.2.1.4 Students’ Interaction with the
Learning Activities 109
4.2.1.5 Summary 118
4.2.2 Difference 119
4.2.2.1 Students’ Interaction with the Teacher 119
4.2.2.2 Students’ Interaction with other Peers 131
4.2.2.3 Students’ Interaction with the Learning
Materials 143
4.2.2.4 Students’ Interaction with the Learning
Activities 162
4.2.2.5 Summary 172

Chapter Five: Discussion 175
5.0 Introduction 175
5.1 Research Question One 175
5.1.1 Summary of the Answer to
Research Question One 175
5.1.2 Providing Definitions for
L2 Learning Boredom 178
5.1.2.1 Discussion: Similar Definition of
L2 Learning Boredom 178
5.1.2.2 Discussion: Different Definition of
L2 Learning Boredom 180
5.2 Research Question Two 183
5.2.1 Summary of the Answer to
Research Question Two 183
vi
5.2.2 Discussion of the Boredom
in the Classroom (Similarities) 186
5.2.3 Discussion of the Boredom
in the Classroom (Differences) 188
5.3. Summary 189
5.4 Pedagogical Implications 190
5.5 Limitation of the Study 194
5.6 Suggestions for Future Research 195
5.7 Conclusion 196
References 201
Appendixes 209
A. First Interview Protocol 209
B. Second Interview Protocol 213
C. Protocol for Stimulated-Recall Interview 216
D. Protocol for Focus-Group Interview 218
E. Consent Form 220		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 2383445 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1005510151en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 英語教學zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 學習情緒zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 無聊zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 成功與不成功學習者zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 國中生zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) English learningen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) learning emotionsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) boredomen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) successful and unsuccessful learnersen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) junior high school studentsen_US
dc.title (題名) 無聊真無趣嗎？：從成功與不成功國中英語學習者的角度探索社會建構主義下無聊情緒對第二語言學習的影響zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Is Boredom Boring?: Understanding Social Construction of Boredom and its influence on L2 Learning from the Perspectives of Successful and Unsuccessful Junior High School Studentsen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Abraham, R. G., & Vann, R. J. (1987). Strategies of two
language learners: A case study. In A. Wenden & J.
Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning
(pp. 85–102). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ahmed, S.M.S. (1990). Psychometric properties of the
boredom proneness scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills,
71, 963–966.
Aragão, R. (2011). Beliefs and emotions in foreign
language learning. System, 39(3),302-313.
Bailey, J.P., Thackery, R.J., Pearl, J., & Parish, T.S.
(1976). Boredom and arousal: Comparison of tasks
differing in visual complexity. Perceptual and Motor
Skills, 43, 141-142.
Barbalet, J.M. (1999). Boredom and Social Meaning. The
British Journal of Sociology, 50 (4), 631-646.
Belton, T., & Priyadharshini, E. (2007). Boredom and
schooling: A cross-disciplinary exploration. Cambridge
Journal of Education, 37, 579–597.
Berlyne, D.E. (1960). Conflict, Arousal and Curiosity.
New York: McGraw-Hill.
Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant
comparative method in the analysis of qualitative
interviews. Quality and Quantity, 36, 391-409
Bown, J., & White, C. (2010). A social and cognitive
approach to affect in SLA. International Review of
Applied Linguistics in Language Learning, (48)4, 331-
353.
Brissett, D. & Snow, R.P. (1993). Boredom: Where the
future isn’t. Symbolic Interaction, 16, 237–56.
Bowers, R. (1980). Verbal behavior in the language
teaching classroom. University of Reading, England:
Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis.
Caldwell, L. L., & Smith, E. A. (1995). Health behaviors
of leisure alienated youth. Society and Leisure, 18,
209 – 218.
Caldwell, L. L., Darling, N. D., Payne, L. L. & Dowdy, B.
(1999). Why are you bored?: An examination of
psychological and social control causes of boredom
among adolescents. Journal of Leisure Re-search,
31(2), 103-122.
Caldwell, L. L., & Darling, N. D. (1999). Leisure
context, parental control, and resistance to peer
pressure as predictors of adolescent partying and
substance use: An ecological perspective. Journal of
Leisure Research, 31, 57–77.
Carspecken, P.F. (1996). Critical ethnography in
educational research: A theoretical and practical
guide. New York: Routledge.
Chambers, G. (1993). Taking the “de” out of demotivation.
Language Learning Journal, 7, 13-16.
Chambers, G. N. (1998). Pupils’ perceptions of the
foreign language learning experience. Language
Teaching Research, 2(3), 231-259.
Chapelle, C., & Jamieson, J. (1988). Research trends in
computer-assisted language learning. In M. Pennington
(Ed.), Teaching languages with computers (pp. 47-59).
La Jolla, CA: Athelstan.
Creswell, J.W. (2002). Educational Research: Planning,
Conducting, and Evaluation Quantitative and
Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
Education Inc.
Cohen, A. (1987). Using verbal reports in research on
language learning. In C. Færch and G. Kasper (eds),
Introspection in Second Language Research. Clevedon:
Multilingual Matters.
Conrad, P. (1997). It’s Boring: Notes on the Meanings of
Boredom in Everyday Life. Qualitative Sociology 20(4),
465–475.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1994). Interest and the quality of
experience in classrooms. European Journal of
Phychology of Education, 9, 251-270.
Damrad-Frye, R., & Laird, J.D. (1989). The experience of
boredom: The role of the self-perception of attention.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2),
315–320.
Darden, D. & Marks, A. (1999). Boredom: a socially
disvalued emotion. Sociological Spectrum,19(1), 13–37.
Dawley, H. (2006). In praise of boredom, sweet boredom: a
researcher believes it can be good for us, May 1.
Available online at: www.medialifemagazine.com2artman/publish/article_4421.asp (accessed 22 February 2007).
Denny, T. (1978). Booklet I. Some still do: River Acres,
Texas. In R. E. Stake & J. Easely (Eds.), Case studies
in science education (National Science Foundation
Report SE 78,74, 2 Volumes). Washington, D.C.: U.S.
Government Printing Office.
Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign
language learning. Language Teaching, 31 (3), 117-135.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation.
Essex, UK: Pearson.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Creating a Motivating Classroom
Environment. The University of Nottingham, UK.
Farmer, R., & Sundberg, N.D. (1986). Boredom proneness—
The development and correlates of a new scale. Journal
of Personality Assessment, 50(1), 4–17.
Ferrell, J. (2004). ‘The Only Possible Adventure:
Edgework and Anarchy’, in Stephen Lyng (ed.) Edgework:
The Sociology of Risk-taking. London: Routledge,
forthcoming.
Firestone, W. A. (1987). Meaning in method: The rhetoric
of quantitative and qualitative research. Educational
Researcher, 16(7), 16-21.
Fisher, C. (1993) Boredom at work: a neglected concept,
Human Relations, 46(3),395–417.
Gan, Z., Humphreys, G., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2004).
Understanding successful and unsuccessful EFL students
in Chinese universities. The Modern Language Journal,
88, 229-244.
Gardner, R.C. (2001). Integrative motivation and second
language acquisition. In Z.D¨ornyei & R. Schmidt
(Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition
(pp. 1–19). Honolulu: Second Language Teaching and
Curriculum Center,University of Hawai’i at Manoa.
Gardner, R.C., & MacIntyre, P.D. (1993). A learner’s
contributions to second language acquisition. Part II.
Affective variables. Language Teaching 26, 1–11.
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall
methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Gaylin, W. (1979). Feelings: Our Vital Signs. New York:
Ballantine Books.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of
grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.
Chicago: Aldine.
Goodsman, D. (1992). Summerhill: theory and practice.
Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of East Anglia,
Norwich.
Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at
learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL
Quarterly, 29, 261–297.
Goetz T., & Frenzel, A. C. (2006). Relations between
achievement emotions and self-concept of ability in
mathematics (Technical Report). University of Munich:
Department of Psychology.
Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., Hall, N. C., & Haag, L. (2006).
Academic emotions from a socio- cognitive perspective:
Antecedents and domain specificity of students’
affect in the context of Latin instruction. British
Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 289–308.
Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., Hall, N. C., &
Lu¨dtke, O. (2007). Between- and within-domain
relations of students’ academic emotions. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 99, 715–733.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual. Harmondsworth:
Penguin.
Gordon, A., Wilkinson, R., McGown, A. & Jovanska, S.
(1997). The psychometric properties of the Boredom
Proneness Scale: an examination of validity.
Psychological Studies 42, 85-97.
Harris, M. (2000). Correlates and characteristics of
boredom proneness and boredom. Journal of Applied
Social Psychology, 30(3). 576–598.
Healy, S. (1984). Boredom, self and culture. Cranbury,
NJ, Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
Herriott, R.E. & Firestone, W.A. (1983). Multiple
qualitative policy research: Optimizing description
and generalizability. Educational Researcher, 12, 14-
19.
Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Leavy, P. (2011). Vie practice of
qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications.
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986).
Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language
Journal 70, l25-l32.
Huang, Jianliang. (2010). Problems in the connection
between primary school and junior high school English
teaching and their counter-measures. Basic Education
Research, (2), 28-30.
Imai, Y. (2010). Emotions in SLA: New Insights from
collaborative learning for an EFL classroom. The
Modern Language Journal, (94)2, 278-292.
Iso-Ahola, S.E. & Crowley E.D. (1991). Adolescent
substance abuse and leisure boredom. Journal of
Leisure Research, 23, pp. 260–271.
Jackson, P. (1968). Life in Classrooms. New York: Holt,
Rinehart & Winston.
Kemper, T. D. (1978). A Social Interactional Theory of
Emotions. New York: Wiley.
Klapp, O. E. (1986). Overload and Boredom: Essays in the
Quality of Life in the Information Society. New York:
Greenwood.
Kracauer, S. (1995). Boredom, in: T. Levin (Trans. &
Ed.), The mass ornament: Wiemar essays. (Cambridge,
MA, Harvard University Press), 75–88.
Krueger, R., & Casey, M. (2000). Focus Groups: A
Practical Guide for Applied Research (3rd ed.).
Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Larson, R. W., & Richards, M. H. (1991). Boredom in the
middle school years: Blaming schools versus blaming
students. American Journal of Education, 99, 418-443.
Lederman, L.C. (1990). Assessing educational
effectiveness: the focus-group interview as a
technique for data collection. Communication
Education, 39, 117-127.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic
inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Long, M. (1980). Inside the “black box”: Methodological
issues in classroom research on language learning.
Language Learning, 30, 1-42.
Lynch, O. (1990). Divine Passions: The Social
Construction of Emotions in India.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
MacIntyre, P. (2002). Motivation, anxiety and emotion in
second language acquisition. In Peter Robinson (ed.),
Individual differences and instructed language
learning, (pp. 45–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Maroldo, G.K. (1986). Shyness, boredom, and grade point
average among college students. Psychological Reports,
59, 385-398.
Martin, M., Sadlo, G., & Stew, G. (2006). The phenomenon
of boredom. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3,
193-211.
Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational
Researcher, 17(2), 13-17.
Meaningless [Def. 2]. (2015). Merriam-Webster Online. In
Merriam-Webster. Retrieved May 5, 2015, from
http://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/meaningless
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case
study applications in education. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
McGrath, I. (2002) Materials Evaluation for Language
Teaching Edinburgh Textbooks in Applied Linguistics,
Edinburgh University Press.
Mikulas, W.L., & Vodanovich, S.J. (1993). The essence of
boredom. The Psychological Record, 43, 3-12.
Pekrun, R., Goetz T., & Titz, W., & Perry, R.P. (2002).
Academic emotions in students self-regulated learning
and achievement. A programme of qualitative and
quantitative research. Educational Psychologist 37(2).
91–105.
O’Hanlon, J.F. (1981). Boredom: practical consequences
and a theory. Acta Psychologica, 49, 53-82.
Parrott, W.G. & Harré, R. (1996). Overview. In Harré R. &
Parrott W.G. (Eds.). The emotions: The social, cultural
and biological dimensions. pp. 1-20. London: Sage.
Patterson, I., & Pegg, S. (1999). Adult learning on the
increase: the need for leisure studies programs to
respond accordingly. JOPERD, 70(5), 45–54
Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research
methods (2nd ed.). Newbury
Park, CA: Sage. Quindlen, A. (2002). Doing nothing is
something. Newsweek, 139(19), 76.
Robinson, W.P. (1975). Boredom at school. British Journal
of Educational Psychology, 45, 141-152.
Shaw, S. (1996). Boredom, stress and social control in
the daily activities of adolescents Journal of Leisure
Research, 28(4), 274-292.
Silverman, D. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research A
Practical Handbook. Sage: London.
Simmel, G. (1971 [1911]) ‘The Adventurer’, in D.N. Levine
(ed.) George Simmel,On Individuality and Social Forms.
Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Smith, L.M. (1978). “An Evolving Logic of Participant
Observation, Educational Ethnography and Other Case
Studies.” In L. Shulman (ed.), Review of Research in
Education. Itasca, Ill.: Peacock, 1978.
Smith, R. (1981). Boredom: A review. Human Factors, 23,
329-340.
Sommers, J. & Vodanovich, S.J. (2000). Boredom proneness:
Its relationship to psychological and physical health
symptoms. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 149-155.
Spacks, P. M. (1995). Boredom: The Literary History of a
State of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stake, R. E. (1981). Case study methodology: An
epistemological advocacy. In W. Welch. (Ed.), Case
study methodology in educational evaluation.
Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Research and Evaluation
Center.
Stake, R. E. (1994). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y.
S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research
(pp. 236-247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Vodanovich, S.J. (2003). Psychometric measures of
boredom: a review of the literature. The Journal of
Psychology, 137, 569-601.
Vodanovich, S.J. & Rupp, D.E. (1999). Are procrastinators
prone to boredom? Social Behavior and Personality, 27,
11-16.
Weaver, C. (1996). Teaching grammar in context.
Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Weinstein, C. (1991). The Classroom as a Social Context
for Learning. Annual Review of Psychology 42, 493-525.
Wen, Q., & Johnson, R. K. (1997). L2 learner variables
and English achievement: A study of tertiary-level
English majors in China. Applied Linguistics, 18, 27–
47.
Wlodkowski, R.J. (1986). Motivation and Teaching: A
Practical Guide. Washington, DC: National Education
Association.
Wright, T. (2006). Managing classroom life. In Simon
Gieve & Inés K. Miller (eds.), Understanding the
language classroom, (pp. 64–87). Hampshire, UK: P
Palgrave Macmillan.
Yin, R.K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods
(3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and
methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Zhu, B & Zhou, Y. (2012). A Study on Students` Affective
Factors in Junior High School English Teaching.
English Language Teaching, 5(7).		zh_TW