1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Foreign Languages and Literature
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 <威尼斯商人>中的物質宰制
The Force of Objects in The Merchant of Venice
作者 周家慈
Chou, Jia Cih
貢獻者 施堂模
Thomas J. Sellari
周家慈
Chou, Jia Cih
關鍵詞 威尼斯商人
物質
禮物
維根斯坦
The Merchant of Venice
Object
Gift
Ludwig Wittgenstein
日期 2015
上傳時間 3-Feb-2016 11:40:59 (UTC+8)
摘要 莎劇<威尼斯商人>已被廣泛地從種族、性別和宗教等角度討論。然而這些非物質的角度並無法全然地描繪全劇。劇中有許多物件，並且深深地影響著劇中的角色們。這篇論文將試著探索物件和人們之間的關係，以三種人與人之間的關係來著手：猶太人和基督徒、父母親和子女以及愛情和友誼。很明顯的，在劇中，角色和物件之間的關係密不可分，甚至物件的力量會高過人們，進而產生控制。維根斯坦以聖奧古斯丁的論點來做為他的語言哲學的開端：語言以物件命名為基礎。但維根斯坦認為語言的運用並不全然建立在為物件命名，而是在不同的情境之下使用且產生不同的意義，換言之，語言重要的目的不是表達意義，而是在情境中發揮功能。而這樣使用語言的方式，描繪了人們的生活形式(Form of Life)。在劇中，物件在不同的情境之下有著不同的意義。由於戲劇能夠反映人生，因此透過探索劇中物件與角色間的關係，可以反映出人們的真實生活抑是和物件密不可分，也反映出人們的生活形式。
The Merchant of Venice has long been discussed with the view of race, gender and religion. These immaterial aspects, however, are not able to depict the totality of the play. There are many material objects in the play, those objects which strongly involved in characters’ relationships. The thesis aims to explore when people grant force on objects and objects act upon people in return by examining objects in the play. The importance of objects can be found in three relationships: Shylock and Christianity, parents and children, love and friendship. It is obvious that objects function diversely in different situation and objects do have influence on characters. Ludwig Wittgenstein starts his linguistic philosophy with St. Augustin’s observation: the use of languages starts from naming objects. However, Wittgenstein thinks that languages function in activities, so we should consider the function of language within activities of life instead of an abstract meaning. The way people use languages can be seen as participating in activities which presents the form of life. Similarly, objects function differently in activities and have diverse impact on characters. Drama is formed by many activities and reflects people’s life. Through finding the importance of characters and objects in The Merchant of Venice, the result can reflect people’s real form of life.
參考文獻 Andrew, Edward. Shylock`s Rights: A Grammar of Lockian Claims. Toronto: U of Toronto, 1988. Print.
Bourdieu, Pierre. “On Symbolic Power,” Language and Symbolic Power. Ed. John B. Thompson. Trans. Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP: 1999. 163-70. Print.
Brown, John Russell, Ed. The Merchant of Venice. London: Methuen, 1995. Print.
Chang, Hsiu-fang. “Asymetrical Reciprocity and Shylock’s Gift in William Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice.” Cross-cultural Studies 1.8 (2012): 103-34. Print.
Chaver, Yael. "Writing For The Jews, Writing For The Goyim: Twentieth-Century Jewish Adaptations Of The Merchant Of Venice."Jewish Social Studies: History, Culture, And Society 17.2 (2011): 28-47. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 15 May 2015.
Cixous, Hélène, and Catherine Clément. The Newly Born Woman. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota, 1986. Print.
Derrida, Jacques. “The Time of the King.” The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity. Ed. Alan D. Schrift. New York: Routledge, 1997. 121-47. Print.
Drakakis, John. Ed. The Merchant of Venice. Lodon: Arden Shakespeare, 2011. Print.
Djuth, Marianne. “Will,” Augustine through the Ages: An Encyclopedia. Ed. Allan Fitzgerald. Grand Rapids, MI: W.B. Eerdmans, 1999. 881-85. Print.
Ferguson, George. Signs and Symbols in Christian Art. New York: Oxford U, 1977. Print.
Garver, Newton. This Complicated Form of Life: Essays on Wittgenstein. Chicago: Open Court, 1994. Print.
Henry S. Turner. "The Problem of the More-than-One: Friendship, Calculation, and Political Association in The Merchant of Venice." Shakespeare Quarterly 57.4 (2006): 413-442. Project MUSE. Web. 18 Mar. 2015.
Li, Deshun. "Foundation of Value." Value Theory a Research into Subjectivity. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013. 25-42. Print.
Lim, S. H. Walter. "Surety and Spiritual Commercialism in The Merchant of Venice." SEL Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 50.2 (2010): 355-382. Project MUSE. Web. 10 Nov. 2014.
Locke, John, and Peter Laslett. Two Treatises of Government. London: Cambridge UP, 1967. Print.
---, Locke on Money. Ed. Patrick H. Kelly. Vol. 1 Oxford: Clarendon, 1991. Print.
Marx, Karl. Capital: a Critique of Political Economy. Vol.1 New York: Vintage, 1977. Print.
Mauss, Marcel. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. Trans. W. D. Halls. London and New York: Norton, 1990. Print.
Newman, Karan. “Portia’s Ring: Unruly Women and Structures of Exchange in The Merchant of Venice.” Shakespeare Quarterly 38.1 (1987): 19-33. JSTOR. Web. 10 Nov. 2014.
Schutte, Valerie. "Inheritance Rights In The Merchant Of Venice." ANQ: A Quarterly Journal Of Short Articles, Notes, And Reviews26.4 (2013): 226-227. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 2 June 2015.
Shell, Marc. "The Wether and the Ewe." Money, Language, and Thought: Literary and Philosophic Economies from the Medieval to the Modern Era. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1993. 47-69. Print.
Sherman, Donovan. "Governing The Wolf: Soul And Space In The Merchant Of Venice." Journal Of Medieval And Early Modern Studies 43.1 (2013): 99-120. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 21 May 2015.
Simmel, Georg. The Philosophy of Money. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978. Print.
Stallybrass, Peter. "Worn Worlds: Clothes and Identity on the Renaissance Stage." Subject and Object in Renaissance Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996. 289-320. Print.
Smith, Courtney Weiss. “Political individuals and Providential Nature in Locke and Pope.” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900 52.3 (2012):609 MLA International Bibliography. Web 4 Sep. 2014.
Engle, Lars. "`Thrift Is Blessing`: Exchange And Explanation In The Merchant Of Venice." Shakespeare Quarterly 37.1 (1986): 20-37.MLA International Bibliography. Web. 20 May 2015.
Russin, Robin. "The Triumph Of The Golden Fleece: Women, Money, Religion, And Power In Shakespeare`s The Merchant Of Venice." Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal Of Jewish Studies 31.3 (2013): 115-130. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 10 May 2015.
White, R. S. "Marx and Shakespeare." Shakespeare Survey (1992): 89-100. Print.
William, O. Scott. “Conditional Bonds, Forfeitures, and Vows in The Merchant of Venice.” English Literary Renaissance 34.3 (2004): 286-305. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 11 Oct. 2014.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Tran. G.E.M Anscobe. 2nd ed. Oxford, 1958. Print.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學系
101551015
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101551015
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 施堂模zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Thomas J. Sellarien_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 周家慈zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chou, Jia Cihen_US
dc.creator (作者) 周家慈zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chou, Jia Cihen_US
dc.date (日期) 2015en_US
dc.date.accessioned 3-Feb-2016 11:40:59 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 3-Feb-2016 11:40:59 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-Feb-2016 11:40:59 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0101551015en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/81153-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 英國語文學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 101551015zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 莎劇<威尼斯商人>已被廣泛地從種族、性別和宗教等角度討論。然而這些非物質的角度並無法全然地描繪全劇。劇中有許多物件，並且深深地影響著劇中的角色們。這篇論文將試著探索物件和人們之間的關係，以三種人與人之間的關係來著手：猶太人和基督徒、父母親和子女以及愛情和友誼。很明顯的，在劇中，角色和物件之間的關係密不可分，甚至物件的力量會高過人們，進而產生控制。維根斯坦以聖奧古斯丁的論點來做為他的語言哲學的開端：語言以物件命名為基礎。但維根斯坦認為語言的運用並不全然建立在為物件命名，而是在不同的情境之下使用且產生不同的意義，換言之，語言重要的目的不是表達意義，而是在情境中發揮功能。而這樣使用語言的方式，描繪了人們的生活形式(Form of Life)。在劇中，物件在不同的情境之下有著不同的意義。由於戲劇能夠反映人生，因此透過探索劇中物件與角色間的關係，可以反映出人們的真實生活抑是和物件密不可分，也反映出人們的生活形式。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The Merchant of Venice has long been discussed with the view of race, gender and religion. These immaterial aspects, however, are not able to depict the totality of the play. There are many material objects in the play, those objects which strongly involved in characters’ relationships. The thesis aims to explore when people grant force on objects and objects act upon people in return by examining objects in the play. The importance of objects can be found in three relationships: Shylock and Christianity, parents and children, love and friendship. It is obvious that objects function diversely in different situation and objects do have influence on characters. Ludwig Wittgenstein starts his linguistic philosophy with St. Augustin’s observation: the use of languages starts from naming objects. However, Wittgenstein thinks that languages function in activities, so we should consider the function of language within activities of life instead of an abstract meaning. The way people use languages can be seen as participating in activities which presents the form of life. Similarly, objects function differently in activities and have diverse impact on characters. Drama is formed by many activities and reflects people’s life. Through finding the importance of characters and objects in The Merchant of Venice, the result can reflect people’s real form of life.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents Chinese Abstract vii
English Abstract ix
Chapter I: Introduction 1
Chapter II: Shylock and Christianity 13
Chapter III: Parents and Children 25
Chapter IV: Love and Friendship 35
Chapter V: Conclusion 47
Works Cited 55		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1020076 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101551015en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 威尼斯商人zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 物質zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 禮物zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 維根斯坦zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) The Merchant of Veniceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Objecten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Giften_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Ludwig Wittgensteinen_US
dc.title (題名) <威尼斯商人>中的物質宰制zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The Force of Objects in The Merchant of Veniceen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Andrew, Edward. Shylock`s Rights: A Grammar of Lockian Claims. Toronto: U of Toronto, 1988. Print.
Bourdieu, Pierre. “On Symbolic Power,” Language and Symbolic Power. Ed. John B. Thompson. Trans. Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP: 1999. 163-70. Print.
Brown, John Russell, Ed. The Merchant of Venice. London: Methuen, 1995. Print.
Chang, Hsiu-fang. “Asymetrical Reciprocity and Shylock’s Gift in William Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice.” Cross-cultural Studies 1.8 (2012): 103-34. Print.
Chaver, Yael. "Writing For The Jews, Writing For The Goyim: Twentieth-Century Jewish Adaptations Of The Merchant Of Venice."Jewish Social Studies: History, Culture, And Society 17.2 (2011): 28-47. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 15 May 2015.
Cixous, Hélène, and Catherine Clément. The Newly Born Woman. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota, 1986. Print.
Derrida, Jacques. “The Time of the King.” The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity. Ed. Alan D. Schrift. New York: Routledge, 1997. 121-47. Print.
Drakakis, John. Ed. The Merchant of Venice. Lodon: Arden Shakespeare, 2011. Print.
Djuth, Marianne. “Will,” Augustine through the Ages: An Encyclopedia. Ed. Allan Fitzgerald. Grand Rapids, MI: W.B. Eerdmans, 1999. 881-85. Print.
Ferguson, George. Signs and Symbols in Christian Art. New York: Oxford U, 1977. Print.
Garver, Newton. This Complicated Form of Life: Essays on Wittgenstein. Chicago: Open Court, 1994. Print.
Henry S. Turner. "The Problem of the More-than-One: Friendship, Calculation, and Political Association in The Merchant of Venice." Shakespeare Quarterly 57.4 (2006): 413-442. Project MUSE. Web. 18 Mar. 2015.
Li, Deshun. "Foundation of Value." Value Theory a Research into Subjectivity. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013. 25-42. Print.
Lim, S. H. Walter. "Surety and Spiritual Commercialism in The Merchant of Venice." SEL Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 50.2 (2010): 355-382. Project MUSE. Web. 10 Nov. 2014.
Locke, John, and Peter Laslett. Two Treatises of Government. London: Cambridge UP, 1967. Print.
---, Locke on Money. Ed. Patrick H. Kelly. Vol. 1 Oxford: Clarendon, 1991. Print.
Marx, Karl. Capital: a Critique of Political Economy. Vol.1 New York: Vintage, 1977. Print.
Mauss, Marcel. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. Trans. W. D. Halls. London and New York: Norton, 1990. Print.
Newman, Karan. “Portia’s Ring: Unruly Women and Structures of Exchange in The Merchant of Venice.” Shakespeare Quarterly 38.1 (1987): 19-33. JSTOR. Web. 10 Nov. 2014.
Schutte, Valerie. "Inheritance Rights In The Merchant Of Venice." ANQ: A Quarterly Journal Of Short Articles, Notes, And Reviews26.4 (2013): 226-227. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 2 June 2015.
Shell, Marc. "The Wether and the Ewe." Money, Language, and Thought: Literary and Philosophic Economies from the Medieval to the Modern Era. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1993. 47-69. Print.
Sherman, Donovan. "Governing The Wolf: Soul And Space In The Merchant Of Venice." Journal Of Medieval And Early Modern Studies 43.1 (2013): 99-120. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 21 May 2015.
Simmel, Georg. The Philosophy of Money. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978. Print.
Stallybrass, Peter. "Worn Worlds: Clothes and Identity on the Renaissance Stage." Subject and Object in Renaissance Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996. 289-320. Print.
Smith, Courtney Weiss. “Political individuals and Providential Nature in Locke and Pope.” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900 52.3 (2012):609 MLA International Bibliography. Web 4 Sep. 2014.
Engle, Lars. "`Thrift Is Blessing`: Exchange And Explanation In The Merchant Of Venice." Shakespeare Quarterly 37.1 (1986): 20-37.MLA International Bibliography. Web. 20 May 2015.
Russin, Robin. "The Triumph Of The Golden Fleece: Women, Money, Religion, And Power In Shakespeare`s The Merchant Of Venice." Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal Of Jewish Studies 31.3 (2013): 115-130. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 10 May 2015.
White, R. S. "Marx and Shakespeare." Shakespeare Survey (1992): 89-100. Print.
William, O. Scott. “Conditional Bonds, Forfeitures, and Vows in The Merchant of Venice.” English Literary Renaissance 34.3 (2004): 286-305. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 11 Oct. 2014.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Tran. G.E.M Anscobe. 2nd ed. Oxford, 1958. Print.		zh_TW