學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 探討高中老師對英文選修課態度信念之個案研究
Senior High School Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices in English Electives: A Case Study作者 劉家慧
Liu, Chia Hui貢獻者 余明忠
Yu, Ming Chung
劉家慧
Liu, Chia Hui關鍵詞 高中英文
選修
課程革新
senior high school English
elective
curriculum revolution日期 2016 上傳時間 1-Mar-2016 10:55:57 (UTC+8) 摘要 在臺灣的高中實施學生自選跑班式英文選修課向來並非易事。文獻中提到許多環境及個人之不利因素，且也少有老師實際參與這種課程。許多教育專家認為教師觀點有助於深入探索了解任何課程設計的各種面向，但現有文獻卻缺乏相關研究。因此，本研究旨在藉由追蹤一名高中教師首度教授一學期英文選修課的機會來探討教師對於英文選修課的看法與做法。本質性研究採用的研究方法包括三項定期訪談、課後訪談、教師反思紀錄、課堂觀察、以及文件蒐集。主要研究期間從100年9月到101年1月。藉由解碼、交叉比對、描述、以及解讀等資料分析方式，本研究之發現如下：(一)參與的教師認為學生自選的跑班式英文選修課整體而言對教師及學生都有益處，且的確有可行性；(二)在課堂教學以及班級經營應變策略的輔助之下，大部分課室內外各種不利實施英文選修課的因素都可被突破，教師也能夠順利在選修課上嘗試新的英文教學方式；(三)目前存在的困境包括學生本身選修意願不高，以及行政配合不足、評分不易、課堂互動受限、以及升學考試衝擊等在授課期間遇到的困難。這些研究發現帶出後續與教授英文選修課相關的討論，包括教師對於課程價值的認可以及專業成長的需求如何影響她接受挑戰並發展適應策略、變動的選修課條件會造成何種衝擊、以及教師如何在渴望嘗試突破以及擔憂工作量增加之間取得平衡。其他同樣值得關注的議題還包括教授選修課而非必修課的新鮮感是否能持續發展帶來更深刻長遠的影響、高中階段的英文選修課是否有可能發展內容導向的教學、以及教師如何能夠在升學因素影響下增加多元英文教學與學習的面向。本研究接著便提出兩項建議：教師善加把握這個另類教學的機會來嘗試各種英文教學方式，校方強化並整合各項行政工作讓選修課程能順利運作。未來希望能有更多研究投入在進一步探討升學考試對於英文選修課的衝擊影響，以及從學生觀點了解高中生對於高中英文選修課的學習需求為何。
The actual implementation of switch-classroom, student-chosen English electives had been a challenging task in most of the senior high schools in Taiwan. Although the existing literature has pointed out both contextual and personal barriers to such practices, there has been lack of teachers’ participation and related studies devoted to understanding these practitioners’ views which many educational experts believe can contribute to further and deeper understanding of the various aspects of curriculum design. Therefore, this research aims to explore English teachers’ views and practices in the implementation of English electives by focusing on a senior high school English teacher’s first-time experience of teaching an elective, News English, throughout a semester. The methods employed in this qualitative research include three periodical periodical interviews, post-class interviews, teacher’s reflective journals, class observation, and document collection. The main study spanned from September 2011 to January 2012. By coding, triangulation, description, and interpretation, the research had the following findings: (1) the teacher participant overall viewed English electives as a positive teaching and learning experience as well as a feasible practice in senior high school, (2) with adaptation strategies regarding English teaching and class management in place, most of the contextual and inside-classroom challenges could be smoothly tackled and new teaching possibilities be experimented with, and (3) the existing difficulties included students’ low motivation in choosing electives and other operational problems such as confusion in administrative work, assessment and grading, class interaction, and the impact of entrance examination. These findings generate more discussions on issues regarding teaching English in an elective, including how the teacher participant’s approval of the values of the elective and her need for professional enhanced her adaption to this new teaching scenario while she simultaneously faced dilemmas such as the impacts of changing circumstances in the implementation of electives and the balance between desire for change/growth and fear for increased workload. Other issues also deserving attention include whether the novel experience of teaching English in an elective rather than a required course can have longer and deeper impact, the possibility of an English elective in senior high school heading for content-driven instruction, and how teachers can deal with the ever-present influence of entrance examinations in an elective aimed to widen the scopes of teaching and learning English. The research then brings forward two suggestions: teachers expanding upon the alternative experience to explore more possibilities of teaching English and school administrations strengthening and incorporating all resources to help make the implementation of electives run more smoothly. It is also expected that more research can be devoted to further explore the impact of entrance examinations on implementing English electives in senior high school, and understand the learning needs of elective takers from students’ point of view.參考文獻 Adams, J. E. Jr. (2000). Taking charge of curriculum: teacher networks and curriculum implementation. New York: Teachers College Press. Andrew Goodwyn (2011). The expert teacher of English. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge.Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., and Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.) Belmont, CA : Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Bogdan, R. & Biklen, S. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Brown, H. Douglas. (1994). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (3rd). New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.Cheng, M.C., Chang, J.C., Chen, Y.C., & Liao, Y.S. (2010). “Do they want the same thing?” Learner perspectives on two content-based course designs in the context of English as a foreign language. Asian EFL Journal 12(4), 2010.Creswell, J. W. (2007) Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Davis, H.C. (2009) Curriculum improvement: The teacher perspective on change in the classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Montana Missoula, Montana. Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Flick, U. (2009) An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). Los Angeles; London: Sage Publications. Gibson, W. J. & Brown, A. (2009). Working with qualitative data. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Ghaith, G. (2004). Correlates of the implementation of the SATD cooperative learning method in the English as a foreign language classroom. Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 7(4), 279-294.Gillham, B. (2000). Case study research methods. London; New York: Continuum.Goodwyn, A (2011). The expert teacher of English. New York, NY : Routledge.Graves, Kathleen. (Eds.) (1996). Teachers as course developers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Hogan, J., Dolan, P., & Donnelly, P. (2009). Approaches to qualitative research: theory & its practical application: a guide for dissertation students. Cork: Oak Tree Press. Huang, Y. K. (2003). Easing into E-news: an EAP course for advanced readers. Selected Papers from the Twelfth International Symposium on English Teaching, English Teachers’ Association, R.O.C. Taipei, November 7-9, 2003Kelly, A.V. (2009) The curriculum: theory and practice (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Ku, H.Y. (2008) (古秀雲). A case study on senior high school English teachers’ beliefs and practices in reading instruction. Unpublished master thesis. The National Chengchi University. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park. Lu, A.Y. (呂艾穎) (2002). Teachers` Beliefs and Classroom Assessments: A Case Study of Two University Instructors of English. Unpublished Master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.McLaughlin, M. W., & Mei-ling Yee, S. (1988). Whose culture is it anyway? In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools. New York: Teachers College Press.Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Nien, Y.H. (粘玉秀) (2002). Teacher beliefs and their influence on classroom practice: A case study of a senior high school English teacher. Unpublished Master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.Pan, H. L., & Yu, C. (1999). Educational reforms and their impacts on school effectiveness and improvement in Taiwan, R.O.C. School Effectiveness and Improvement, 10(1), 72-85.Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Savage, M. M. (2008). What teachers see: ongoing judgments and adaptations in the classroom today. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the Gonzaga University. Seidman, I. E. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: a guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York : Teachers College Press. Silverman, D. (2010). Doing qualitative research: a practical handbook. London: SAGE Publications. Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: studying how things work. New York: Guilford Press.Wang, C. C. (2000). A Sociolinguistic Profile of English in Taiwan: Social Contexts and Learner Needs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the Pennsylvania State University, Philadelphia.Wang, W.F. (2006). Exploring teacher beliefs and practice in the implementation of a new English language curriculum in China: Case studies. Paper presented at APERA Conference, November 28-30, 2006.Waugh, R. F. (2000). Towards a model of teacher receptivity to planned system-wide educational change in a centrally controlled system, Journal of Educational Administration, 38(4), 350-367.Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. You, Y. L. (2009). The study of investigating the effect of English educational policy on post-secondary English education, A survey of ELT policies in Taiwan: From elementary to college. Taipei: Crane.CHINESE REFERENCESPan, H. L., (潘慧玲) (2005) 我國普通高中課程綱要發展之基礎研究—普通高中課程必選修之研究, 國立台灣師範大學教育學系.Cheng, M. H. & Cheng, Y. S., (鄭銘和、鄭永森) (2005) 普通高級中學課程暫行綱要實務工作手冊, 教育部. M.O.E., (教育部) (2004, 2010) Senior High Curriculum Guidelines (普通高級中學課程綱要總綱).M.O.E., (教育部) (2004) Senior High Curriculum Guideline for required course English (普通高級中學必修科目「英文」課程綱要) M.O.E., (教育部) (2004) Senior High Curriculum Guideline for elective English listening, English reading and writing, English writing, and English grammar (普通高級中學選修科目「英語聽講」、「英文閱讀與寫作」、「英文作文」、「英文文法」課程綱要). 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
英語教學碩士在職專班
97951014資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097951014 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 余明忠 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Yu, Ming Chung en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 劉家慧 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Liu, Chia Hui en_US dc.creator (作者) 劉家慧 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Liu, Chia Hui en_US dc.date (日期) 2016 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-Mar-2016 10:55:57 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-Mar-2016 10:55:57 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Mar-2016 10:55:57 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0097951014 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/81602 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 英語教學碩士在職專班 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 97951014 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 在臺灣的高中實施學生自選跑班式英文選修課向來並非易事。文獻中提到許多環境及個人之不利因素，且也少有老師實際參與這種課程。許多教育專家認為教師觀點有助於深入探索了解任何課程設計的各種面向，但現有文獻卻缺乏相關研究。因此，本研究旨在藉由追蹤一名高中教師首度教授一學期英文選修課的機會來探討教師對於英文選修課的看法與做法。本質性研究採用的研究方法包括三項定期訪談、課後訪談、教師反思紀錄、課堂觀察、以及文件蒐集。主要研究期間從100年9月到101年1月。藉由解碼、交叉比對、描述、以及解讀等資料分析方式，本研究之發現如下：(一)參與的教師認為學生自選的跑班式英文選修課整體而言對教師及學生都有益處，且的確有可行性；(二)在課堂教學以及班級經營應變策略的輔助之下，大部分課室內外各種不利實施英文選修課的因素都可被突破，教師也能夠順利在選修課上嘗試新的英文教學方式；(三)目前存在的困境包括學生本身選修意願不高，以及行政配合不足、評分不易、課堂互動受限、以及升學考試衝擊等在授課期間遇到的困難。這些研究發現帶出後續與教授英文選修課相關的討論，包括教師對於課程價值的認可以及專業成長的需求如何影響她接受挑戰並發展適應策略、變動的選修課條件會造成何種衝擊、以及教師如何在渴望嘗試突破以及擔憂工作量增加之間取得平衡。其他同樣值得關注的議題還包括教授選修課而非必修課的新鮮感是否能持續發展帶來更深刻長遠的影響、高中階段的英文選修課是否有可能發展內容導向的教學、以及教師如何能夠在升學因素影響下增加多元英文教學與學習的面向。本研究接著便提出兩項建議：教師善加把握這個另類教學的機會來嘗試各種英文教學方式，校方強化並整合各項行政工作讓選修課程能順利運作。未來希望能有更多研究投入在進一步探討升學考試對於英文選修課的衝擊影響，以及從學生觀點了解高中生對於高中英文選修課的學習需求為何。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) The actual implementation of switch-classroom, student-chosen English electives had been a challenging task in most of the senior high schools in Taiwan. Although the existing literature has pointed out both contextual and personal barriers to such practices, there has been lack of teachers’ participation and related studies devoted to understanding these practitioners’ views which many educational experts believe can contribute to further and deeper understanding of the various aspects of curriculum design. Therefore, this research aims to explore English teachers’ views and practices in the implementation of English electives by focusing on a senior high school English teacher’s first-time experience of teaching an elective, News English, throughout a semester. The methods employed in this qualitative research include three periodical periodical interviews, post-class interviews, teacher’s reflective journals, class observation, and document collection. The main study spanned from September 2011 to January 2012. By coding, triangulation, description, and interpretation, the research had the following findings: (1) the teacher participant overall viewed English electives as a positive teaching and learning experience as well as a feasible practice in senior high school, (2) with adaptation strategies regarding English teaching and class management in place, most of the contextual and inside-classroom challenges could be smoothly tackled and new teaching possibilities be experimented with, and (3) the existing difficulties included students’ low motivation in choosing electives and other operational problems such as confusion in administrative work, assessment and grading, class interaction, and the impact of entrance examination. These findings generate more discussions on issues regarding teaching English in an elective, including how the teacher participant’s approval of the values of the elective and her need for professional enhanced her adaption to this new teaching scenario while she simultaneously faced dilemmas such as the impacts of changing circumstances in the implementation of electives and the balance between desire for change/growth and fear for increased workload. Other issues also deserving attention include whether the novel experience of teaching English in an elective rather than a required course can have longer and deeper impact, the possibility of an English elective in senior high school heading for content-driven instruction, and how teachers can deal with the ever-present influence of entrance examinations in an elective aimed to widen the scopes of teaching and learning English. The research then brings forward two suggestions: teachers expanding upon the alternative experience to explore more possibilities of teaching English and school administrations strengthening and incorporating all resources to help make the implementation of electives run more smoothly. It is also expected that more research can be devoted to further explore the impact of entrance examinations on implementing English electives in senior high school, and understand the learning needs of elective takers from students’ point of view. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents TABLE OF CONTENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ivTABLE OF CONTENTS vCHINESE ABSTRACT viENGLISH ABSTRACT viiCHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1Background and motivation 1Purpose of the study 4Significance of the study 5CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW 7Curriculum Reform 7More flexibility in senior high school curriculum 7The implementation of electives 8Implementation of English electives in senior high schools: a challenging task 9Contextual factors 9Teaching English in an elective 9Backdrop: From EGP to ESP 10Electives in senior high: Content-driven or Language-driven? 11The need to explore teachers` views and practices: at the classroom level 12The complexity of teachers’ receptivity to curriculum change 12What held back teachers in Taiwan? 14Lack of qualitative data at classroom level 15Research Questions 17CHAPTER THREE: MATHODOLOGY 19Setting of the case 19Participant 20Data collection method 22Interviews 22Classroom Observation 24Teacher’s reflective journals 26Document Collection 27Data collection procedure 28Pilot study 28Main study 29Data analysis 31Coding 31Triangulation 32Description 33The researcher’s role 34CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS 35Findings 35Brenda’ views on the implementation of English electives 35Curriculum design 35Goals of English electives 39Impacts on teachers 40Impacts on students 45Brenda’s practice of teaching an English elective 47Promoting students’ learning motivation 47Class management 50Dealing with an unfamiliar classroom and its facility 53Planning working time and schedule 55Designing and preparing for the elective 57Constraints and difficulties Brenda faced in teaching an English elective 63Students’ low motivation in choosing English electives 63Confusion caused by administrative work 65Assessment and grading 67The teacher’s role in participating in English electives 70Teacher-student and peer student interaction 70The impact of entrance examination 72Answers to the three research questions 73Research Question 1 73Research Question 2 75Research Question 3 77CHAPTER FIVE: DISCUSSION 79Teachers’ participation in the implementation of English electives 79Adaptation to curriculum change 79Favorable factors 81Approval of the core value 82Need for professional growth 83Dilemma 84A hard-won battle or a lucky victory? 85Fear of increased workload v s Desire for change and growth 86Teaching an English elective: critical issues 88Teaching an elective rather than a required course 89A novel experience or long-term practice? 89Difficulty in evaluation: what and how 90Elective as a course or a not-a-required-course? 91Teaching English in an elective 91Towards content-driven instruction? 91The impact of entrance examinations 94CHAPTER SIX: CONCLUSION 97Summary of the major findings 97Implications 99Limitations 100Suggestions for future research 100References 102Appendixes 107 zh_TW dc.format.extent 11725457 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097951014 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 高中英文 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 選修 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 課程革新 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) senior high school English en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) elective en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) curriculum revolution en_US dc.title (題名) 探討高中老師對英文選修課態度信念之個案研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Senior High School Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices in English Electives: A Case Study en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Adams, J. E. Jr. (2000). Taking charge of curriculum: teacher networks and curriculum implementation. New York: Teachers College Press. Andrew Goodwyn (2011). The expert teacher of English. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge.Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., and Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.) Belmont, CA : Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Bogdan, R. & Biklen, S. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Brown, H. Douglas. (1994). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (3rd). New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.Cheng, M.C., Chang, J.C., Chen, Y.C., & Liao, Y.S. (2010). “Do they want the same thing?” Learner perspectives on two content-based course designs in the context of English as a foreign language. Asian EFL Journal 12(4), 2010.Creswell, J. W. (2007) Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Davis, H.C. (2009) Curriculum improvement: The teacher perspective on change in the classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Montana Missoula, Montana. Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Flick, U. (2009) An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). Los Angeles; London: Sage Publications. Gibson, W. J. & Brown, A. (2009). Working with qualitative data. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Ghaith, G. (2004). Correlates of the implementation of the SATD cooperative learning method in the English as a foreign language classroom. Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 7(4), 279-294.Gillham, B. (2000). Case study research methods. London; New York: Continuum.Goodwyn, A (2011). The expert teacher of English. New York, NY : Routledge.Graves, Kathleen. (Eds.) (1996). Teachers as course developers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Hogan, J., Dolan, P., & Donnelly, P. (2009). Approaches to qualitative research: theory & its practical application: a guide for dissertation students. Cork: Oak Tree Press. Huang, Y. K. (2003). Easing into E-news: an EAP course for advanced readers. Selected Papers from the Twelfth International Symposium on English Teaching, English Teachers’ Association, R.O.C. Taipei, November 7-9, 2003Kelly, A.V. (2009) The curriculum: theory and practice (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Ku, H.Y. (2008) (古秀雲). A case study on senior high school English teachers’ beliefs and practices in reading instruction. Unpublished master thesis. The National Chengchi University. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park. Lu, A.Y. (呂艾穎) (2002). Teachers` Beliefs and Classroom Assessments: A Case Study of Two University Instructors of English. Unpublished Master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.McLaughlin, M. W., & Mei-ling Yee, S. (1988). Whose culture is it anyway? In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools. New York: Teachers College Press.Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Nien, Y.H. (粘玉秀) (2002). Teacher beliefs and their influence on classroom practice: A case study of a senior high school English teacher. Unpublished Master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.Pan, H. L., & Yu, C. (1999). Educational reforms and their impacts on school effectiveness and improvement in Taiwan, R.O.C. School Effectiveness and Improvement, 10(1), 72-85.Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Savage, M. M. (2008). What teachers see: ongoing judgments and adaptations in the classroom today. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the Gonzaga University. Seidman, I. E. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: a guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York : Teachers College Press. Silverman, D. (2010). Doing qualitative research: a practical handbook. London: SAGE Publications. Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: studying how things work. New York: Guilford Press.Wang, C. C. (2000). A Sociolinguistic Profile of English in Taiwan: Social Contexts and Learner Needs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the Pennsylvania State University, Philadelphia.Wang, W.F. (2006). Exploring teacher beliefs and practice in the implementation of a new English language curriculum in China: Case studies. Paper presented at APERA Conference, November 28-30, 2006.Waugh, R. F. (2000). Towards a model of teacher receptivity to planned system-wide educational change in a centrally controlled system, Journal of Educational Administration, 38(4), 350-367.Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. You, Y. L. (2009). The study of investigating the effect of English educational policy on post-secondary English education, A survey of ELT policies in Taiwan: From elementary to college. Taipei: Crane.CHINESE REFERENCESPan, H. L., (潘慧玲) (2005) 我國普通高中課程綱要發展之基礎研究—普通高中課程必選修之研究, 國立台灣師範大學教育學系.Cheng, M. H. & Cheng, Y. S., (鄭銘和、鄭永森) (2005) 普通高級中學課程暫行綱要實務工作手冊, 教育部. M.O.E., (教育部) (2004, 2010) Senior High Curriculum Guidelines (普通高級中學課程綱要總綱).M.O.E., (教育部) (2004) Senior High Curriculum Guideline for required course English (普通高級中學必修科目「英文」課程綱要) M.O.E., (教育部) (2004) Senior High Curriculum Guideline for elective English listening, English reading and writing, English writing, and English grammar (普通高級中學選修科目「英語聽講」、「英文閱讀與寫作」、「英文作文」、「英文文法」課程綱要). zh_TW
