| dc.contributor.advisor | 詹惠珍 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chan, Hui-Chen | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 張國斌 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Chang, Kuo-Pin | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 張國斌 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Chang, Kuo-Pin | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 1998 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-04-28 | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-04-28 | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 2016-04-28 | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | B2002002194 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/86890 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 語言學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 83555007 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 一個說話者在交談中做修護，不僅僅只是為了改變語句的句法結構，他會做修護是因為他所說出的語句，與他原本意欲表達的內容比較之下，出現了語意模糊、指涉太廣、或意有不足的地方。雖然修護可依照不同的詞彙與句法的改變來加以分類，但修護類別的產生也應把被修護語(Reparandum)與修護語(Reparan)之間的語意關係列入考量。此外，若修護的出現有一語用的目的，以語意的角度來區別各種不同的修護形式，有助於解釋修護類別與其語用功能之間的互動關係。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | A speaker does not repair just for a change of the syntactic structure of his current utterance. A speaker repairs because he finds something uttered may be vague, ambiguous, too general, or insufficient in the meaning of the message he intends to express. Although repairs can be classified according to various kinds of lexical or syntactic modification, categorization of repairs should take into consideration different semantic relationships between the reparandum and the reparan. Considering that each occurrence of repair must have a pragmatic function to serve, a semantic approach on the classification of conversational repair would be more helpful than a syntactic one in explaining the interaction between the repair strategies and their potential pragmatic functions. And the methodology for this study is to collect the instances of repair from nine conversations, including same-gender and cross-gender ones. Based on these repairs, it is closely examined how the semantic relationship between the reparandum and the reparan determines a pragmatic function and how that pragmatic function influences the choice of the available repair strategies. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgements-----iv List of Tables-----viii List of Diagrams-----ix List of Abbreviations-----x List of Conventions for Data Transcription-----xi Chinese Abstract-----xii English Abstract-----xiv CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION-----1 I. The Problem-----1 II. General Goals and Scope-----1 III. Repair Strategies: Semantic Categorization of Repair-----2 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW-----5 I. Definition of Repair-----5 A. Repair in General Scope-----5 B. Self-repair-----6 II. Categories of Repair-----8 A. Different Repair vs. Abandonment-----10 B. Appropriateness Repair-----10 C. Error Repair-----13 D. Covert Repair-----13 III. Pragmatic Functions of Repair-----17 A. Clarification-----18 B. Confirmation-----19 IV. Social Significance-----22 CHAPTER THREE: THE VARIABLES AND THE HYPOTHESES-----25 I. Classification of Repair-----25 A. Repetition and Completion-----28 B. Interpretation: Paraphrase and Elaboration-----30 C. Substantialization-----32 D. Replacement-----32 E. Addition-----35 II. Pragmatic FTincticms of Repair-----36 A. Content-oriented Repair-----37 1. Clarification-----37 2. Specification-----39 3. Confirmation-----41 4. Correction-----44 B. Mechanism-oriented Repail-----44 1. Reformulation-----45 2. Message-organizing-----46 III Social Significance-----48 IV. Hypotheses-----49 CHAPTER FOUR: METHODOLOGY-----51 I. Variables-----51 II. Corpus of Data-----51 A. Types of Conversation and the Constraints of Its Collection-----52 B. Sampling-----52 1. Source of Subjects-----53 2. Social Characteristics of Subjects-----53 III. Date Transcription-----54 IV. Data Analysis-----55 CHAPTER FIVE: DATA ANALYSIS-----57 I Types of Repair vs. Pragmatic Functions-----57 A. General Differences among Features of Each Repair Strategy for Available Pragmatic Functions-----61 B. The Preferential Order of Repair Strategies for Each Pragmatic Function-----68 1. Repair for Clarification-----69 a. Process-----69 b. Qualified types of repair for clarification-----70 c. Explanations for the priority of repair types for clarification-----73 2. Repair for Specification-----78 a. Process-----79 b. Qualified types of repair for specification-----80 c. Explanations for the priority of repair types for specification-----82 3. Repair for Confirmation-----84 a. Process-----84 b. Qualified types of repair for confirmation-----85 c. Explanations for the priority of repair types for confirmation-----87 II. Gender as a Social Variable infhiencing a Speaker`s Choice of Repair Types for Pragmatic Functions-----92 III. Summary-----95 CHAPTER Six: CONCLUDING REMARKS-----101 Bibliography-----109 List of Tables Table 1. Classifications of repair bv Levelt (1983) and Chui (1996)-----16 Table 2. Classifications of repair by Levelt (1983), Chui (1996), and Chang-----26 Table 3. Categories of repair by Chang and the respective semantic features of the leparandnm and the reparan-----27 Table 4. Pragmatic functions of each repair type-----47 Table 5. Selected types of repair and pragmatic functions in this study-----48 Table 6. Social characteristics of the subjects-----54 Table 7. Percentages of each repair strategy for each pragmatic function-----58 Talde 8. Recalculated percentages of the five repair types Tised for three pragmatic functions-----60 Table 9. Four characteristics of five repair types used for each of the three pragmatic functions-----63 Table 10. Results of the independent samples test on each pair out of the three repair strategies for the pragmatic function of Clarification-----73 Table 11. Results of the independent samples test on each pair out of the three repair strategies for the pragmatic function of Confirmation-----88 Table 12. The respective percentages in the use of repair types for each pragmatic function by two sexes-----93 Table 13. Recalculated percentages from. Table 11-----93 Table 14. The results of Independent Samples Test on the differences between males and females in the five repair strategies for the three pragmatic functions-----94 List of Diagrams Diagram 1. Model of repair for Clarification-----70 Diagram 2. Model of repair for Specification-----79 Diagram 3. Model of repair for Confirmation-----85 | zh_TW |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002002194 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 語言學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Linguistics | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 交談中選擇修護類別的語意與語用條件 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Choosing repair types in conversation--semantic and pragmatic determinants | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en_US |
