Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/81132| 題名: | 探討實習課對職前華語文教師教學信念與教學行為之影響 A Case Study of How Teaching Practicum Influences Interns’ Beliefs and Practices |
作者: | 黃子耘 Huang, Tzu Yun |
貢獻者: | 洪煌堯 Hong, Huang Yao 黃子耘 Huang, Tzu Yun |
關鍵詞: | 職前華語文教師 教學實習 教學信念 教學行為 Chinese language pre-service teachers teaching practicum teaching belief teaching practice |
日期: | 2014 | 上傳時間: | 3-Feb-2016 | 摘要: | 本研究旨在探討實習課對職前華語文教師教學信念與教學行為之影響，以某國立大學華語文教學碩士學程二年級的七位台籍學生為研究對象。首先，教學信念之探討係透過質性訪談、試教後的反思札記、及修改前後之教案等相關資料進行分析；其次，教學行為的探討則以剖析職前華語文教師試教錄影檔案中的行為表現為主；最後，再進行交叉比對，以探究教學信念與教學行為之間的關係。主要研究問題為：第一，實習課如何影響職前華語文教師教學信念(共分為教學方式、師生角色、課程與教材、教學任務四個面向進行探討)？第二，藉著實習課錄影檔案，探究職前華語文教師的具體教學表現行為為何？第三，教學信念及教學行為之間的關係為何？分析方式則是藉由Nvivo 統計分析軟體編碼以質化方式分析教學信念，其次以量化方式分析教學行為，然後再以紮根理論方式探討教學信念與教學行為間的關係。\n\n研究結果顯示：(一)本個案中的教學實習課對職前華語文教師所形塑之教學信念較趨向效能取向; (二)本個案中的教學實習課對職前華語文教師教學行為之影響主要為提高其以學生中心方式教學的比例; (三)本個案中的職前華語文教師之教學信念與教學行為間的關係並非完全一致，而是呈現出些微相異處；(四)整體而言，教學實習課有助於職前華語文教師增進教學專業能力，亦其助其瞭解學習者特性知識與教育現場所需的脈絡知識。最後，根據研究結果，本研究提出相關建議供未來華語文師資教育之參考。 This case study aims to understand how teaching practicum might impact pre-service teachers’ teaching beliefs and teaching practices. Participants were seven Taiwanese Chinese language pre-service teachers who were in their 2nd year of graduate study and they were from the Department of Teaching Chinese as Second Language at a national university in Taiwan. To implement, firstly, this study analyzed pre-service teachers’ teaching beliefs using qualitative interviews, reflective teaching journals, and their teaching plans and other relevant information. These data were coded by using Nvivo statistical software. Secondly, this study analyzed pre-service teachers’ teaching practice using their videotaped records. Lastly, this study made use of all above collected data in a more integrated manner to analyze the relationship between pre-service teachers’ teaching beliefs and their teaching practices based on grounded theory.\n\nThe main findings of this study include the following: (1) After teaching practicum, the teaching beliefs of the participating pre-service teachers became more efficiency-oriented; (2) After teaching practicum, the teaching practices of the participating pre-service teachers became more likely to perform more student-centered teaching; (3) It was found that the relationship between pre-service teachers’ teaching beliefs and teaching practices was not fully consistent; (4) Overall, it was found that teaching practicum employed in this course not only enhanced pre-service teachers’ professional teaching ability but also equipped them with more knowledge of learners, as well as learners’ characteristics, and more knowledge of educational contexts.\n\nBased on the findings, three suggestions for cultivating more effective Chinese language pre-service teachers were made. |
參考文獻: | 一、中文部分\n王瑞壎(2006)。教學實習課程中教學實際突破與省思之行動研究。國民教育研究學報，16，1-26。\n王文科、王智弘（編譯）（2002）。質的教育研究－概念分析（第五版）。台北市：師大書苑。\n方吉正(1997)。教師信念研究之回顧與整合—六種研究取向。教育資料與研究，20，36-44。\n方麗娜：〈臺灣華語文教育的師資培育（上）：學位教育（含學位學程）〉，收錄於國家教育研究院編：《臺灣華語文教育發展史》，新 北：國家教育研究院，2013 年，頁 181-208。\n江吟梓、蘇文賢（譯）。Marilyn Lichtman著(2010)。教育質性研究實用指南。台北市:學富文化事業有限公司。\n李麗君(2000)。不同師資培育管道學生之教學信念及其改變歷程研究(I)。國科會專題研究計畫：NSC89-2413-H-032-009-S。\n李麗君(2002)。職前教師教學信念及其改變之研究。中等教育學報，9，1-26。\n李麗君(2003)。師資培育課程對師資生教學信念影響之研究。社會變遷與中小學課程教學再造國際學術研討會，淡江大學。\n李麗君(2006)。檢視師資生教學信念與其實踐之方案實施與成效。國立臺北教育大學學報，19(1)，39-62。\n宋如瑜(2010)。華語文教師的專業發展──以個案為基礎的探索(頁203-207)。臺北市：秀威資訊科技。\n宋如瑜(2012)。華語教師的教學語言研究──以師資培育為導向(未出版博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學，臺北市。\n吳惠萍(2014)。華語文師資創新教學能力研究──以知識翻新理論為原則(未出版博士論文計畫書)。國立政治大學，臺北市。\n林清財(1990)。我國國民小學教師教育信念之相關研究(未出版博士論文)。國立政治大學，臺北市。\n周新富(2007)。教育研究法。臺北市，五南。\n邵佩欣(2012)。由外語學習歷程與信念探討職前華語文教師之教學信念(未出版碩士論文)。國立政治大學，臺北市。\n周春美、沈建華(2003)。教育學程學生在「短期校外教學實習期間」教學專業化省思歷程研究。教育科學期刊，3(1)，79-97。\n高強華(1996)。師資培育問題研究。台北：師大書苑。\n張佩瑛、蔣治邦(2000)。課堂內師生問答互動之研究：國小數學課問答互動中教師教學信念與教學處理的關係。教育心理研究，23，99-122。\n張景媛、鄭章華、范德鑫、林靜君(2012)。「教師學習社群」發展對話式形成性評量實務及其對學習成效之影響。教育心理學報，43(3)，717-734。\n葉重新(2001)。教育研究法。臺北市：心理。\n陳昺麟(2001)。社會科學質化研究之紮根理論實施程序及實例介紹。勤益學報，19，327-342。\n陳怡秀(2004)。華語教師的文法教學信念之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。\n陳麗華(1990)。評析俄亥俄州立大學的「反省性教學」方案。載於師範教育學會主編，師範教育政策與問題(頁313-333)。台北：師大書苑。\n翁子雯(2006)。師資培育法變革對提升優質教師素質之教育實習核心策略探討。學校行政雙月刊，41，176-187。\n蔡鳳芝(2005)。職前教師在教學實習課程中教學信念及教學行為反省行為之探討(未出版碩士論文)。國立中山大學，高雄市。\n賴明德(2013)。臺灣華語文教育發展史。國家教育研究院(主編)， 師資培育現況。新北市：國家教育研究院。 \n羅倫新(2001)。教育實習理論與實務之探討。教育科學期刊，1(2)，43-59。\n湯仁燕(1993)。國民小學教師教學信念與教學行為關係之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。\n黃雅鈴(2014)。國民小學專家教師教學信念與教學行為之個案研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。\n葉連棋、王春展、林松濬(1997)。「教師信念問卷」(PTR)之簡介。教育資料文摘，39(2)，頁21-27。\n曹逢甫(2007)。臺灣華語文教學師資培訓。柯華葳、何大安（主編），華語文研究與教學：四分之一世紀的回顧與前瞻。臺北：世界華語文學會。\n魏韶勤、張德銳(2006)。教學觀察與回饋對國小初任教師教學效能影響之研究。課程與教學季刊，9(2)，89-103。\n譚彩鳳(2006)香港中文教師教學信念及背景因素之研究。當代教育研究，14(1)，113-146。\n\n二、英文部分\nAvalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in “Teaching and Teacher Education“ over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10-20.\ndoi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007 \nBall, D.L., Lubienski, S., & Mewborn, D. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson(Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching(4thed.,pp.433-456). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.\nBennet, N. (1976). Teaching styles and pupil progress. Cambridge Mass：Harvard University Press.\nBorg, S. (2001). Self-perception and practice in teaching grammar. ELT Journal, 55, 21-29.\nBrousseau, B.A., Book, C., & Byers, J.L. (1988). Teacher beliefs and the cultures of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(6), 33-39.\nBrousseau, B.A., & Freeman, D. J.(1988). How do teacher education faculty members define desirable teacher beliefs? Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 267-273.\nByrd, P., &Garofalo, J. (1982). Issues in conducting a pre-student teaching field experience. Journal of research and development in education, 15(4), 45-52.\nCalderhead, J., & Robson, M. (1991). Images of teaching : student teachers’ early conception of classroom practice. Teaching & teacher education.7(1), 1-8. \nCrawford, V M. (2007). Adaptive expertise as knowledge building in science teachers problem solving. The Proceedings of the Second European Cognitive Science Conference, Delphi, Greece.\nGrouws, D. A., & Koehler, M. S.(1992). Mathematics teaching practices and their effects. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp.115-126). New York: Macmillan.\nHatano, G., & Inagaki. K. (1986).Two courses of expertise.In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma. & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan. (pp. 262-272). New York: Free man. \nHorwitz, E.K.(1985). Using student beliefs about language learning and teaching in the foreign language methods course. Foreign Language Annals, 18, 333-340.\nKagan, D.M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65-90.\nKember, D., & Kwan, K. P.(2002). Lecturers’ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. In N. Hativa & P. Goodyear(Eds.), Teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education (pp. 219-239). Boston: Kluwer Academic.\nKern, R. (1995). Students’and teachers’ beliefs about language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 28, 71-91.\nKuhs, T. M., & Ball, D. L. (1986). Approaches to teaching mathematics: Mapping the domain of knowledge, skills, and dispositions. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Center on Teacher Education.\nNespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 317-328.\nNettle, E. B. (1998). Stability and change in the beliefs of student teachers during practice teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(2), 193-204.\nPajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research. 62(3), 307-332.\nRenzalia, A., Hutchins, M., & Lee, S. (1997). The impact of teacher education on the beliefs, attitudes, and dispositions of preservice special educators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 4, 360-377.\nSchwartz, D L, Bransford J D, Sears D.(2006) Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In Mestre J P (eds.) . Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 1-51). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing Hoyles.\nSchmidt, W. H., & Buchmanm, M. (1983). Six teachers’ beliefs and attitudes and their curricular time allocations. The Elementary School Journal, 84(2), 162-171.\nSchmidt, M. (2010). Learning from teaching experience: Dewey’s theory and preservice teachers’ learning. Journal of research in music education, 58(2), 131-146. doi:10.1177/0022429410368723\nShaw, E. L., & Cronin-Jones, L. (1989). The influence of methods instruction on the beliefs of pre-service elementary and secondary science teachers: Preliminary comparative analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-south Educational Research ssociation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED918 639).\nSpeer, N. M. (2005). Issues of methods and theory in the study of mathematics Teachers’ professed and attributed beliefs. Educational studies in Mathematics, 58, 361-391.\nStuart, C., & Thurlow, D. (2000). Making it their own: Preservice teachers’ experiences, beliefs and classroompractices. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(2), 113-121.\nTabachnick, B. R., & Zeichner, K. M. (1985). The development of teacher perspectives:final report.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED266099)\nWehling, L. J., & Charters, W.W. (1969). Dimensions of teacher beliefs about the teaching process. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 7-29.\nYang, N.D. (1992). Second language learners’ beliefs about language learning and their use of learning strategies: A study of college student of English in Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, Texas. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 華語文教學碩士學位學程 1011610121 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1011610121 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012101.pdf | 1.87 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.