Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32907
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor柯華葳zh_TW
dc.contributor.author徐韶君zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHsu,Shao Chunen_US
dc.creator徐韶君zh_TW
dc.creatorHsu,Shao Chunen_US
dc.date2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T06:49:31Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T06:49:31Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T06:49:31Z-
dc.identifierG0911570021en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32907-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description幼兒教育所zh_TW
dc.description91157002zh_TW
dc.description96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究採實驗研究法,旨在探討電子童書中,動畫與文本一致性及年齡對幼兒閱讀理解的影響。實驗採用的研究工具為Living-books系列之「小馬斯特上學去」的電子童書,研究樣本以台北縣市四所公私立幼稚園中大班幼兒為實驗對象,中班受試樣本30人,隨機選取各班人數分派至實驗二中;大班受試樣本60人,隨機選取各班人數分派至實驗一與實驗二中,實驗一分為實驗組(30人)與對照組(30人),實驗組閱讀動畫與文本一致之電子童書,對照組閱讀動畫與文本較不一致之電子童書。\n\n 本研究之實驗研究分為實驗一與實驗二,實驗一旨在分析大班幼兒閱讀動畫與文本一致性與否對閱讀理解的影響;實驗二旨在探討中班與大班幼兒閱讀電子童書時,其閱讀理解的差異。\n\n 閱讀理解評量以個別施測方式進行故事回憶測驗及故事理解測驗,其中故事理解測驗分為文意理解測驗及推論理解測驗。將所得的資料以單因子變異數及二因子混合設計變異數進行統計分析,以了解研究之結果。\n\n 研究結果顯示:\n一、在閱讀動畫與文本一致性高之電子童書時,對於故事回憶測驗的得分,實驗組得分顯著高於對照組得分。\n二、在閱讀動畫與文本一致性高之電子童書時,對於故事理解測驗的得分,實驗組不論在文意理解或推論理解上,得分皆顯著高於對照組得分。\n三、大班組幼兒在故事回憶測驗上的得分顯著高於中班組幼兒的得分。\n四、大班組幼兒在故事理解測驗上的總分顯著高於中班組幼兒。在文意理解測驗中,大班組得分顯著高於中班組得分,而推論理解的得分則未達到顯著性的差異。\n五、故事回憶與故事理解的相關,在實驗一與實驗二中,不論是文意理解或推論理解,與故事回憶皆呈現顯著正相關。換句話說,閱讀動畫與文本較不一致之電子童書時,故事回憶量低,故事理解得分亦較低;而閱讀動畫與文本一致之電子童書時,故事回憶高,故事理解得分則較高。\n\n 研究者根據研究結果與限制,提出對教師、父母、出版商及未來研究方面的建議。\n\n 關鍵字:閱讀理解、動畫與文本一致性、電子童書、幼兒zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study has two parts: one is to research the impact of coherence between text and animation on children’s reading. The other is to analyze the effect of ages on children’s reading comprehention while they read electronic story books.\n\n The research adopted one of a series of Living-books, called Little Monster At School. 30 aged 4 and 60 aged 5 children from public and private kindergartens of Taipei city and County participated in the study. There were 2 tasks. Tesk one was coherent text for experimental group. Task 2 was incoherent text for control group. The content of the two tasks was the same.\n\n After reading the electronic book, all children took memory test and comprehension test which was devided into 2 sub-score: fact comprehension and inference comprehension.\n\n Results are:\n1. Memory test’s scores of experimental group is obviously higher than that of control group.\n2. Reading comprehension scores of experimental group is also higher than that of control group.\n3. Memory test’s scores of age 5 children is higher than age 4 children.\n4. Age 5 children get higher total reading comprehension scores than age 4 children. Furthermore, they get higher score on fact questions. Scores of inference questions however, do not show age difference.\n5. Memory and story reading comprehension scores have positive correlation. It reveals that children reading coherent animation and text have higher memory scores and higher comprehension scores. On the other hand, children who had the incoherent text had poor scores of both.\n\n Based on the results, researcher provides suggestions for teachers, parents and book publisher. \n\n Key words: reading comprehension, animation of electronic storybooks, coherence of text, kindergarten children.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1\n 第一節 究動機與目的-------------------------------------1\n第二節 研究問題---------------------------------------------4\n第三節 名詞釋義---------------------------------------------5\n第二章 文獻探討 9\n第一節 電子童書之定義與形式----------------------------------9\n第二節 電子童書互動式動畫之型態------------------------------12\n第三節 幼兒閱讀理解----------------------------------------17\n第四節 幼兒閱讀互動式動畫之理解及研究------------------------25\n第三章 實驗一 31\n第一節 研究設計--------------------------------------------31\n第二節 研究樣本--------------------------------------------32\n第三節 研究工具--------------------------------------------35\n第四節 研究程序--------------------------------------------40\n第五節 資料的蒐集及分析方法---------------------------------43\n第六節 研究結果--------------------------------------------45\n第四章 實驗二 55\n第一節 研究設計--------------------------------------------55\n第二節 研究樣本--------------------------------------------56\n第三節 研究工具及程序--------------------------------------56\n第四節 資料的蒐集及分析方法---------------------------------57\n第五節 研究結果--------------------------------------------58\n第五章 討論與建議 73\n第一節 結論與討論------------------------------------------73\n第二節 建議-----------------------------------------------81\n \n參考文獻\n一、中文部分-----------------------------------------------85\n二、英文部分-----------------------------------------------88\n\n附錄\n附錄一 電子童書文本取樣-------------------------------------91\n附錄二 電子童書文本評選標準---------------------------------93\n附錄三 故事文本--------------------------------------------95\n附錄四 實驗組文本與對照組文本物件的比較-----------------------97\n附錄五 故事回憶重點調查問卷--------------------------------100\n附錄六 故事回憶重點概念─小馬斯特上學去----------------------102\n附錄七 故事理解測驗題目------------------------------------104\n附錄八 故事理解測驗題目專家意見-----------------------------106\n附錄九 家長同意書-----------------------------------------108\n \n表目次\n表3-1:實驗一研究樣本人數統計--------------------------------33\n表3-2:實驗組文本與控制致組文本動畫物件量---------------------36\n表3-3:故事理解測驗項目成分----------------------------------38\n表3-4:兩個評分者的Spearman相關係數--------------------------43\n表3-5:參與實驗一的樣本數-----------------------------------45\n表3-6:兩組故事回憶平均數與標準差摘要表-----------------------45\n表3-7:兩組與故事回憶之單因子變異數分析摘要表------------------46\n表3-8:兩組幼兒在文意理解及推論理解平均數與標準差摘要表---------51\n表3-9:不同試驗組別的文意及推論理解表現效果之二因子混合設計變異數分析摘要表---------------------------------------------------51\n表3-10:各表現效果在不同試驗組別表現得分之單純主要效果變異數分析摘要表--------------------------------------------------------52\n表3-11:故事回憶與文意理解、推論理解相關係數表-----------------54\n表4-1:實驗二研究樣本人數統計--------------------------------56\n表4-2:不同評分者檢定---------------------------------------57\n表4-3:參與實驗二的樣本數-----------------------------------58\n表4-4:各年齡組故事回憶平均數、標準差摘要表--------------------59\n表4-5:不同年齡組別的後測及延後測在故事回憶表現之二因子混合設計變異數分析摘要表-----------------------------------------------60\n表4-6:各年齡組文意理解測驗平均數摘要表-----------------------67\n表4-7:不同年齡組別的後測及延後測在文意理解表現之二因子混合設計變異數分析摘要表-----------------------------------------------67\n表4-8:各年齡組推論理解測驗平均數摘要表-----------------------68\n表4-9:不同年齡組別的後測及延後測在推論理解表現之二因子混合設計變異數分析摘要表-----------------------------------------------68\n表4-10:故事回憶與文意理解、推論理解相關係數表-----------------70\n \n圖目次\n圖3-1:研究架構--------------------------------------------31\n圖4-1:研究架構--------------------------------------------55zh_TW
dc.format.extent3329963 bytes-
dc.format.extent3383010 bytes-
dc.format.extent3420309 bytes-
dc.format.extent3388933 bytes-
dc.format.extent3474768 bytes-
dc.format.extent3538821 bytes-
dc.format.extent3633386 bytes-
dc.format.extent3618602 bytes-
dc.format.extent3574315 bytes-
dc.format.extent3476516 bytes-
dc.format.extent3511284 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0911570021en_US
dc.subject閱讀理解zh_TW
dc.subject動畫與文本一致性zh_TW
dc.subject電子童書zh_TW
dc.subject幼兒zh_TW
dc.subjectreading comprehensionen_US
dc.subjectanimation of electronic storybooksen_US
dc.subjectcoherence of texten_US
dc.subjectkindergarten childrenen_US
dc.title電子童書與幼兒閱讀理解之研究zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference一、中文部分:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王心怡(2006)。故事結構教學對國小閱讀障礙兒童閱讀理解教學成效之研究。國立台南大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王英君(2000)。國小閱讀障礙學生閱讀理解策略之研究。彰化師範大學特殊教zh_TW
dc.relation.reference育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference何應傑(2002)。兒童閱讀圖畫書意義建構之研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李世忠、葉盈秀(2006)。認知負荷與多媒體教材設計之探討。視聽教育,47卷,6期,頁1-19。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林文寶(2000)。台灣地區兒童閱讀興趣調查研究。台北:文建會出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林巧芳(2002)。大班幼兒對動畫訊息的解讀-以「企鵝家族」為例。國立嘉義大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林秀貞(1997)。國小六年級學童社會科閱讀理解研究。國立高雄師範大學教育zh_TW
dc.relation.reference研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林佩菁(2003)。故事架構教學對國中學習障礙學生閱讀理解表現之研究。彰化師範大學特殊教育學系研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林菁(1995)。動畫中的圖像複雜度對兒童高低層次認知學習的影響。國立嘉義師範學院,行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳淑琴(1999)。幼兒之多媒體電子童書閱讀行為分析。第五屆亞洲兒童文學大zh_TW
dc.relation.reference會廿一世紀的亞洲兒童文學論文集(頁148-151)。台北市:台北市立圖書館。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference洪文瓊(1997)。電子書對傳統童書的挑戰及其教育價值。出版界,56期,頁42-48。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference洪文瓊(1997)。電子童書小論叢。台東:台東師院語文教育學系。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference洪美珍(2000)。電子童書閱聽型態及其對兒童閱讀影響之研究。國立台東師範學院兒童文學研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference施能木(1997)。淺談多媒體電子童書。國教之聲,30卷,4期,頁50-55。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐照麗(1999)。教學媒體:系統化的設計、製作與運用。台北市:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳英豪、吳裕益(1995)。測驗與評量。高雄市:復文書局出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳淑琦(1991)。故事呈現方式與故事結構對學前及學齡兒童回憶及理解之影響。 中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳慧卿(2003)。國小二年級學童對電子童書與紙本童書之閱讀能力研究。朝陽科技大學幼兒保育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張春興(1996)。教育心理學─三化理論的取向與實踐。台北市:台灣東華書局股份有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference馮秋萍(1998)。兒童閱讀行為之探討。圖書與資訊學刊,25期,頁63-72。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃瓊儀(1996)。國小學童閱讀理解策略、閱讀理解歸因與閱讀理解能力相zh_TW
dc.relation.reference關之研究。國民教育研究學報,2期,頁107-149。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉玉玲(2001)。國小學童動畫教育初探。研習資訊,18卷,4期,頁79-83。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉玉玲(2000)。以動畫觀點探討互動式動畫故事書之創作特質及對圖畫書與動畫之影響。臺南藝術學院音像動畫研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉玲吟(1994)。後設認知閱讀策略的教學對國中低閱讀能力學生閱讀效果之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡銘津(1997)。文章結構分析策略教學對增進學童閱讀理解與寫作成效之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference談麗梅(2001)。兒童閱讀運動中教師推行信念、學校策略與兒童閱讀態度之研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭妃玲(2002)。說明文結構對國小六年級學童閱讀理解的影響。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭明進(1989)。兒童文學論述選集(林文寶主編)。台北:幼獅文化事業公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭瑞菁(1999)。幼兒文學。台北市:心理出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference錡寶香(2004)。國小低閱讀能力學童與一般學童的敘事能力:故事結構之分析。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference特殊教育研究學刊,26 期,頁247-269。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference顏若映(1994)。先前知識與文章連貫性對國小學童閱讀理解之影響。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference藍慧君(1991)。學習障礙兒童與普通兒童閱讀不同結構文章之閱讀理解與理解策略的比較研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蘇育瑠(1990)。幼兒故事回憶與理解之研究。國立台灣師範大學家政研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDiane, E. P., & Sally, W. O.(1990).Child development.黃慧真(譯)。兒童發展。台北市:桂冠。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHeinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russell, J. D.(1995). Instructional media and the new technologies of instruction. 李文瑞、沈中偉(譯)。教學媒體與教學新科技。台北市:心理。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R.(1998). The cognitive psychology of school learning. 岳修平(譯)。教學心裡學:學習的認知基礎。台北市:遠流。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMayer, R. E.(1990). Educational psychology : A cognitive approach.林清山(譯)。教育心理學:認知取向。台北市:遠流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference二、英文部分:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAdam, N., & Wild, M.(1997).Applying CD-ROM interactive storybooks to learning to read. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13(2), 119-132.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBuckleitner, W.(1999).Why children love computers. Journal of Scholastic Parent & Child, 6(5), 38-43.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceClark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E.(2003). E-Learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDoty, D. E., Popplewell, S. R., & Byers, G. O.(2001). Interactive CD-ROMzh_TW
dc.relation.referencestorybooks and young readers’reading comprehension. Journal ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceResearch on Computing in Education, 33, 374-384.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHiggins, N. C., & Cocks, P.(1999). The effects of Animation cues on vocabulary development. Journal of Reading Psychology, 20, 1-10.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLabbo, L. D., & Kuhn, M. R.(2000). Weaving Chains of Affect and Cognition:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceA Young Child`s Understanding of CD-ROM Talking Books. Journal of Literacy Research, 32(2), 187-210.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLai, Shu-Ling(1998). The Effects of Visual Display on Analogies Using Computer-Based Learning. Journal of Instructional Media, 25(2), 151-160.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLewin, C.(1998). Talking Book Design: What Do Practitioners What? Journal of Computers & Education, 30(1/2), 87-94.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHunt, C., & Nelson, J.(1996).Multimedia storytimes. Booklist, 15, 1596-1597.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJackson, M.(1997). The troubling lessons of Arthur`s Teacher Trouble: Old stereotypes in a new commodity. Journal of Children`s literature Association Quarterly, 22(1), 30-36.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKontos, S., Mackley, H., & Baltas, J. G.(1986).Story knowledge in preschoolers:A comprehensive view. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 147(2), 189-197.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMatthew, K.(1996).The impact of CD-ROM Storybooks on children`s reading comprehension and reading attitude. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5(3/4), 379-394.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMatthew, K.(1997). A comparison of the influence of Interactive CD- ROM storybooks and traditional print storybooks on readingzh_TW
dc.relation.referencecomprehension. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29(3), 263-275.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMorrow, L. M.(1985). Retelling stories : A strategy for improving youngzh_TW
dc.relation.referencechildren’s comprehension, concept of story, and oral language complexity. Elementary School Journal, 85(5), 647-661.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePark, O.(1998). Visual Displays and contextual Presentations in Computer- Based Instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(3), 37-50.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePearson, P. D., & Johnson, D. D.(1978). Teaching reading comprehension.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNew York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePoulsen, D., Kintsh, E., Kintsch, K. & Premack, D.(1979). Children`s comprehension and memory for stories. Journal of Experimental child Psychology, 28, 379-403.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRicci, C. M.(1998). Children`s memory and comprehension for a story:zh_TW
dc.relation.referencecomparison of audio, audio-visual, and interactive CD-ROM mediazh_TW
dc.relation.referencepresentation.(Doctoral dissertation, University Massachusetts Amherst, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 109.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTally, S., Lancy, D. F., & Lee, T. R.(1997). Children,storybooks and computers. Journal of Reading Horizons, 38(2), 116-128.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThorndyke, P. W.(1977). Cognitive Structures in Comprehension and Memory of Narrative Discourse. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77-110.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTrushell, J. & Maitland, A.(2005). Primary pupils` recall of interactive storybooks on CD-ROM: inconsiderate interactive features and forgetting. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 57-66.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUnderwood, G. & Underwood, J. D. M.(1998).Children`s interactions and learning outcomes with Interactive Talking Books. Journal of Computers & Education, 30(1/2), 95-102.zh_TW
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
57002101.pdf3.25 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
57002102.pdf3.3 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
57002103.pdf3.34 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
57002104.pdf3.31 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
57002105.pdf3.39 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
57002106.pdf3.46 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
57002107.pdf3.55 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
57002108.pdf3.53 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
57002109.pdf3.49 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
57002110.pdf3.4 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
57002111.pdf3.43 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.