Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32995
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor馮朝霖zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorFong, Chao Linen_US
dc.contributor.author葉彥宏zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorYe, Yan Hongen_US
dc.creator葉彥宏zh_TW
dc.creatorYe, Yan Hongen_US
dc.date2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T07:02:54Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T07:02:54Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T07:02:54Z-
dc.identifierG0094152011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32995-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description教育研究所zh_TW
dc.description94152011zh_TW
dc.description96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract人類的政治與日常生活內容存在於公共領域和私領域中,隨著社會的自由化與民主化,公私領域也對教育產生影響。本研究把公共領域視為政治生活的空間,人們在其中通過彼此的共同經驗來討論各種議題。私領域則是涉及自身關係與親密關係等內容,其發展與公共領域有密不可分的關係。本研究重新描述了Dewey教育理論中的經驗與民主等概念,且針對其中的不足之處,企圖以公私領域的概念加以充實之。研究者主要從四個部分的分析來重構Dewey的理論:一、增加生活經驗的多樣性;二、社會化與個性化的兼顧;三、公共與私人的民主生活;四、民主教育的自主與團結。根據上面的分析,最後研究者對Dewey的教育理論提出了四點建議:第一,把公私領域的概念融入Dewey的經驗理論中,使人們注意到在經驗的連續性及交互作用中,存在那些公共與私人生活的複雜關係;第二,重申個性化和社會化必須兼顧的重要性;第三,瞭解各種團體的互動關係能使共同生活更為完善;第四,把各種公共與私人的關係納入考量中,將有助於彰顯出完整的人類生活面貌。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe politics and daily life of human lay both in the public and the private sphere, along with the liberalization and democratization in the society, the public and the private sphere also bring about influence on education. The study treats public sphere as the realm of political life. In the realm, people discuss various subjects with their associated experiences. The private sphere involves self and intimacy relations, their development have inseparable relevance to public sphere. The study redescribes the concepts of experience and democracy in the Dewey’s educational theory, and attempts to enrich his shortage with the concept of the public and the private sphere. The Author reconstructs Dewey’s educational theory by four points: Adding the variation of life experiences, giving equal attention to socialization and individualization, public and private democratic life, autonomy and solidarity of the democratic education. Accordingly, the author proposes four suggests to Dewey`s educational theory: Firstly, if people want to understand the complexity of the public and the private life, they need to integrate the public sphere and the private sphere into Dewey’s experience theory. Secondly, reiterating the importance of the individualization and the socialization must be given equal attention. Thirdly, understanding the interactive relationships in various associations could cause to a better associated living. Fourthly, it will be helpful to show a complete human life by taking all kinds of the public and the private relation into account.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents中文摘要i\n英文摘要iii\n目 錄v\n表目錄ix\n圖目錄ix\n\n第一章 緒論1\n第一節 問題敘述與研究目的1\n壹、問題敘述1\n貳、研究目的11\n第二節 研究方法與步驟13\n壹、研究架構13\n貳、各章節內容規劃16\n參、研究範圍17\n肆、研究限制18\n第二章 概述公私領域理論19\n第一節 公共領域對政治和社群的訴求20\n壹、公共領域即政治生活:Arendt的立場21\n貳、演化的公私領域關係:Habermas的主張24\n參、公共領域的共同經驗:Taylor的觀點9\n肆、公共領域之蔽與私領域之興30\n第二節 私領域的自身關係及親密關係31\n壹、關注自身的技術──自身關係32\n貳、不可或缺的他人──親密關係38\n第三節 公私領域與教育的相關性44\n壹、公私領域理論的分與合45\n貳、公私領域在教育的開展48\n第三章 Dewey民主教育之內容與困境59\n第一節 教育的經驗、科學性質59\n壹、以經驗為開端的教育理論59\n貳、理智作為判斷經驗的指針61\n參、科學作為組織經驗的手段62\n第二節 教育的社會、政治功能64\n壹、教育所扮演的社會功能64\n貳、教育負有民主化的責任67\n第三節 公共的問題與私人的不足69\n壹、社會或是個人的經驗?70\n貳、何種民主社會的自由?73\n第四章 公私領域與Dewey79\n第一節 Dewey教育理論的再建構79\n壹、增加生活經驗的多樣性79\n貳、社會化與個性化的兼顧82\n參、公共與私人的民主生活85\n肆、民主教育的自主與團結87\n第二節 公私領域與Dewey的聯繫89\n壹、公共領域與Dewey89\n貳、私領域與Dewey92\n第三節 公私領域對Dewey的啟示94\n壹、擴展生活經驗的公共與私人範疇95\n貳、同時看重個性化與社會化的發展97\n參、強調共同生活之公共及私人面貌100\n肆、建構民主社會的個人與群體關係101\n第五章 結論與建議105\n \n參考文獻111\n中文部分111\n西文部分114\n\n表 目 錄\n表1-2-1 各章節之規劃表17\n表2-3-1 作為政治生活的公共領域49\n表2-3-2 公私領域的演化關係50\n表2-3-3 公共領域與共同經驗51\n表2-3-4 私領域的自身關係53\n表2-3-5 私領域的親密關係55\n表2-3-6 公私領域代表的不同內涵58\n表4-1-1 第三章Dewey經驗理論的探討脈絡80\n\n圖 目 錄\n圖1-2-1 研究架構示意圖15\n圖2-3-1公私領域的關係及其主要的內容47\n圖2-3-2公私領域之重要概念的相互影響48\n圖4-1-1 Dewey的經驗理論與其範疇82\n圖4-1-2 社會化和個性化的關係84\n圖4-1-3 公共與私人的民主生活型態 86\n圖4-1-4 自主與團結的社會發展型式89\n圖4-3-1 本章第一節內容的統整圖93zh_TW
dc.format.extent40582 bytes-
dc.format.extent69043 bytes-
dc.format.extent86610 bytes-
dc.format.extent80703 bytes-
dc.format.extent414641 bytes-
dc.format.extent437092 bytes-
dc.format.extent262233 bytes-
dc.format.extent838021 bytes-
dc.format.extent149079 bytes-
dc.format.extent142753 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094152011en_US
dc.subject公共領域zh_TW
dc.subject私領域zh_TW
dc.subject杜威zh_TW
dc.subjectPublic Sphereen_US
dc.subjectPrivate Sphereen_US
dc.subjectJohn Deweyen_US
dc.title以公私領域概念充實Dewey教育理論之研究zh_TW
dc.titleA Study on The Dewey’s Educational Theory through The Concepts of Public and Private Spheresen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference公民(譯)(2006)。論公民不服從。Hannah Arendt著。中國現象學網。2006年10月,取自http://www.cnphenomenology.com/0610203.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference王淩雲(譯)(2006)。黑暗時代的人們。Arendt Hannah著。中國現象學網。2006年10月,取自http://www.cnphenomenology.com/0610204.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference丘亦岱(2003)。諾丁關懷倫理學之研究。嘉義大學國民教育研究所,未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江宜樺(2001)。自由民主的理路。台北:聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江宜樺(2003)。公共領域中理性溝通的可能性。思與文網刊(本文原載於《知識份子論叢》第一期)。2005年12月,取自http://chinese-thought.unix-vip.cn4e.com/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=275zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李丁讚、吳介民、吳乃德、陳弱水、夏春祥、錢永祥、顧忠華(2004)。公共領域在台灣──困境與危機。台北:桂冠。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李保宗(譯)(1997)。公民與國家之間的距離。Charles Taylor著。思與文網刊(原載於《二十一世紀》1997年4月)。2005年12月,取自http://chinese-thought.unix-vip.cn4e.com/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=337zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李瓊音(2001)。關懷倫理與公領域。中正大學社會福利研究所,未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference沈樹華(1998)。哈伯瑪斯的「公共領域」與「市民社會」理論。台灣師範大學公民訓育研究所,未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference佘碧平(譯)(2002)。性經驗史。Michel Foucault著。上海:人民。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference佘碧平(譯)(2005)。主體解釋學。Michel Foucault著。上海:人民。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林玉体(譯)(2000)。民主與教育。John Dewey著。台北:師大。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林倩秀(2006)。諾丁(Nel Noddings)的關懷倫理及其教育意涵。佛光人文社會學院哲學研究所,未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林寶山、康春枝(譯)(1990)。學校與社會‧兒童與課程。John Dewey著。台北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference姜文閩(譯)(2001)。經驗與教育。John Dewey著。台北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡適(譯)(1999)。杜威五大講演。John Dewey著。安徽:安徽教育。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference袁碩成(2005)。「由底部而起」的改變:親密關係的民主化──評紀登斯《親密關係的轉變》。《網路社會學通訊期刊》第44期,2005年01月15日。2007年2月,取自http://www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/44/44-15.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference高宣揚(2005)。傅柯的生存美學。北京:中國人民大學。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference高廣孚(1991)。杜威教育思想。台北:水牛。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張錦華(1997)。公共領域、多文化主義與傳播研究。台北:正中。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference曹衛東、王曉珏、劉北城、宋偉杰(譯)(1999)。公共領域的結構轉型。Jürgen Habermas著。上海:學林。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳玟伶(2003)。哈伯瑪斯公共領域理念之研究。政治大學政治研究所,未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳瑋鴻(2004)。理性與重建──哈伯瑪斯的現代性政治哲學。政治大學政治研究所,未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference傅統先、邱椿(譯)(2006)。人的問題。John Dewey著。南京:江蘇教育。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference彭如婉(1997)。從當代社群主義的公民觀探討公民教育。台灣師範大學公民訓育研究所,未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference曾漢塘、林季薇(譯)(2000)。教育哲學。Nel Noddings著。台北:弘智。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference童世駿(2005)。公與私:劃界問題的歸屬問題。黃俊傑、江宜樺(編),公私領域新探:東亞與西方觀點之比較(頁205-219)。台北:台大。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference童世駿(譯)(2003)。事實與格式。Jürgen Habermas著。台北:商務。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃俊傑、江宜樺(編)(2005)。公私領域新探:東亞與西方觀點之比較。台北:台大。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃俊龍(譯)(2003)。公民身份。Keith Faulks著。台北:巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊貞德(1995)。「大社群」:杜威論工業社會中民主的必要及其可行性。陳秀容、江宜樺(編),政治社群(頁153-176)。台北:中研院。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉姝言(1997)。自由主義及其公民教育。台灣師範大學公民訓育研究所,未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉莘(譯)(2003)。當代政治哲學導論。Will Kymlicka著。台北:聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡佩君(譯)(1996)。共和危機。Hannah Arendt著。台北:時報文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡明璋(譯)(2002)。親密關係:現代社會的私人關係。Lynn Jamieson著。台北:群學。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡英文(2002)。政治實踐與公共空間──漢娜‧鄂蘭的政治思想。台北:聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡英文(2005)。公共領域與民主共識的可能性。黃俊傑、江宜樺(編),公私領域新探:東亞與西方觀點之比較(頁221-242)。台北:台大。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭義愷(譯)(2005)。傅柯說真話。Michel Foucault著。台北:群學。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蕭高彥(1996)。共同體的理念:一個思想史之考察。台灣政治學刊,1,257-295。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference西文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceArendt, Hannah(1958). The human condition. London: University of Chicago.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceArendt, Hannah(1972). Crises of the republic: Lying in politics, civil disobedience on violence, thoughts on politics and revolution. San Diego: Harcourt Brace.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceArendt, Hannah(1995). Men in dark times. San Diego: Harcourt.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBernstein, Richard J.(1991). The new constellation : The ethical-political horizons of modernity/postmodernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCampbell, James(1998). Dewey’s conception of community. Hickman, Larry A. (Ed.), Reading Dewey: Interpretations for a postmodern generation(23-42). Manufactured: Indiana University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDewey, John(1939). Freedom and culture. N. Y.: Capricorn.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDewey, John(1946). Problems of men. N. Y.: Philosophical Library.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDewey, John(1948). Reconstruction in philosophy. Boston: Beacon.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDewey, John(1954).The public and its problems. Chicago: Swallow.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDewey, John(1957). Experience and education. N. Y.: Macmillan.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDewey, John(1960). The quest for certainty: A study of knowledge and action. N. Y.: Putnam.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDewey, John(1963). The child and the curriculum & The school and society. London: University of Chicago.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDewey, John(1966). Democracy and education. N. Y.: Free.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDewey, John(1973a). A philosophy of education. Clopton, Robert W. & Tsuin-Chen Ou(Eds.), John Dewey: Lectures in China, 1919-1920(181-302). Hawaii: University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDewey, John(1973b). Social and political philosophy. Clopton, Robert W. & Tsuin-Chen Ou(Eds.), John Dewey: Lectures in China, 1919-1920(41-180). Hawaii: University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFaulks, Keith(2000). Citizenship. N. Y.: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFoucault, Michel(1988). The care of the self: The history of sexuality Vol. 3. N. Y.: Vintage Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFoucault, Michel(1990). The use of pleasure: The history of sexuality Vol. 2. N. Y.: Vintage Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFoucault, Michel(2001). Fearless speech. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGarrison, James W. (1998). John Dewey’s philosophy as education. Hickman, Larry A. (Ed.), Reading Dewey: Interpretations for a postmodern generation(63-81). Manufactured: Indiana University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGiddens, Anthony(1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge, U. K.: Polity.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHabermas, Jürgen(1989). The structure transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge: MIT.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHabermas, Jürgen(1996). Between facts and norms: Contribution to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge: MIT.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNoddings, Nel(1984). Caring:A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. University of California.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNoddings, Nel(1995).Care and Moral Education. W. Kohli(Ed.)Critical Conversations in Philosophy of Education. New York:Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNoddings, Nel(1996). On Community. Educational Theory, 46(3): 245-267.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNoddings, Nel(2002). Starting at Home:Caring and Social Policy. University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRorty, Richard(1998). Achieving our country: Leftist thought in twentieth-century America. Cambridge: Harvard University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSartori, Giovanni(1987). The theory of democracy revisited. New Jersey: Chatham House.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSomjee, A. H.(1968). The political theory of John Dewey. N. Y.: Teachers College.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStuhr, John J. (1998). Dewey’s social and political philosophy. Hickman, Larry A. (Ed.), Reading Dewey: Interpretations for a postmodern generation(82-99). Manufactured: Indiana University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTaylor, Charles(1992). Modernity and the rise of the public sphere. The tanner lectures on human values, Delivered at Stanford University. Retrieved March 30, 2007, from http://www.tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/Taylor93.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTiles, J. E. (1992). Introduction: Political theory and social practice. Tiles, J. E.(Ed.), John Dewey: Critical assessments Vol. II(1-21). N. Y.: Routledge.zh_TW
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairetypethesis-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
201101.pdf39.63 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201102.pdf67.42 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201103.pdf84.58 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201104.pdf78.81 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201105.pdf404.92 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201106.pdf426.85 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201107.pdf256.09 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201108.pdf818.38 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201109.pdf145.58 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201110.pdf139.41 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.