Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35262
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor謝明華zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorHsieh,Ming-huaen_US
dc.contributor.author邱景暉zh_TW
dc.creator邱景暉zh_TW
dc.date2003en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-18T06:34:55Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-18T06:34:55Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-18T06:34:55Z-
dc.identifierG0913560361en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35262-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description資訊管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description91356036zh_TW
dc.description92zh_TW
dc.description.abstract 美式賣權已經存在很長的時間,由於沒有公式解,目前只能利用數值分析方法(numerical analysis approach)和解析近似法(analytic approximations) 來評價它。這類的評價方法在文獻中相當多,但對這些方法的完整的比較卻相當貧乏。本文整理了27種評價方法和186種在文獻中常被引用的美式賣權契約,這些契約包含了各種不同狀態(有股利、沒有股利、價內、價平、價外、短到期日、長到期日),後續的研究者可以用這些美式賣權契約來驗證他們的方法。本文實作其中14種方法並應用於上述的186種美式賣權契約上。這14種方法包含了樹狀法、有限差分法、蒙地卡羅法與解析近似法。從這些數值的結果中,本文根據精確度與計算效率整理出各種方法的優缺點與適用的時機。\n 由本文之數值分析,我們得到下列幾點結論:1.Binomial Black and Scholes with Richardson extrapolation of Broadie and Detemple (1996)與Extrapolated Flexible Binomial Model of Tian (1999)這二種方法在這14種方法中,在速度與精確度的考量下是最好的方法;2.在精確度要求在root mean squared relative error大約1%的情形下,解析近似法是最快的方法;3.Least-Squares Simulation method of Longstaff and Schwartz (2001)在評價美式賣權方面並不是一個有效的方法。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractAmerican put option has existed for a long time. They cannot be valued by closed-form formula and require the use of numerical analysis methods and analytic approximations. There exists a great deal of methods for pricing American put option in related literatures. But a complete comparison of these methods is lacking. From literatures, we survey 27 methods and 186 commonly cited option contracts, including options on stock with dividend, non-dividend, in-the-money, at-money and out-of-money, short maturity and long maturity. In addition, we implement 14 methods, including lattice approaches, finite difference methods, Monte Carlo simulations and analytic approximations, and apply these methods to value the 186 option contracts above. From the numerical results, we summarize the advantages and disadvantages of each method in terms of speed and accuracy: 1.The binomial Black and Scholes with Richardson extrapolation of Broadie and Detemple (1996) and the extrapolated Flexible Binomial Model of Tian (1999) are both efficient improvements over the binomial method. 2.With root mean squared relative error about 1%, the analytic approximations are faster than the numerical analysis methods. 3.The Least-Squares Simulation method of Longstaff and Schwartz (2001) is not an effective method for pricing American put options.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents1 Introduction 1\n\n2 Valuation Methods 4\n 2.1 Lattice Approach 6\n 2.1.1 The Binomial Option Pricing Model 7\n 2.1.2 The Trinomial Option Pricing Model 8\n 2.1.3 The Log-Transformed Binomial Option Pricing Model 10\n 2.1.4 The Modified Binomial Option Pricing Model 11\n 2.1.5 The Modified Trinomial Option Pricing Model 11\n 2.1.6 The Extensible Flexible Binomial Option Pricing Model 12\n 2.1.7 The Binomial Black and Scholes Option Pricing Method 13\n 2.1.8 The Accelerated Binomial Option Pricing Method 14\n2.2 Finite Difference Method 14\n 2.2.1 The Explicit Finite Difference Method 15\n 2.2.2 The Implicit Finite Difference Method 15\n2.3 The Simulation Approach 16\n 2.3.1 Least-Squares Simulation 16\n2.4 Analytic Approximation Methods 18\n 2.4.1 Barone-Adesi and Whaley(1987) method 19\n 2.4.2 Geske and Johnson (1984) method 20\n 2.4.3 Ibanez (2003) method 20\n\n3 Numerical results and Comparisons 22\n 3.1 Selected option contracts 22\n 3.2 Numerical Results 29\n 3.3 Comparison in accuracy 34\n 3.4 Comparison in speed 41\n 3.5 Comparison in speed and accuracy trade off 42\n\n4 Conclusions and future research 51\n\n5 Appendix 53\n\n6 Reference 57zh_TW
dc.format.extent14522 bytes-
dc.format.extent12682 bytes-
dc.format.extent16055 bytes-
dc.format.extent16359 bytes-
dc.format.extent24016 bytes-
dc.format.extent24341 bytes-
dc.format.extent17895 bytes-
dc.format.extent86475 bytes-
dc.format.extent2397505 bytes-
dc.format.extent16973 bytes-
dc.format.extent26177 bytes-
dc.format.extent25186 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0913560361en_US
dc.subject美式賣權zh_TW
dc.subject美式選擇權zh_TW
dc.subjectAmerican put optionen_US
dc.subjectAmerican optionen_US
dc.titleValuation of Anerican Put Options: A Comparison of Existing Methodszh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference1. Abramowitz, M. and I. A. Stegun, 1970, Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover Publications, New York.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2. Amin, K., and A. Khanna, 1994, Convergence of American option values from discrete- to continuous-time financial models, Mathematical Finance 4, 289-304.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference3. Brennan, M., and E. Schwartz, 1977, The valuation of American put options, Journal of Finance 32, 449-462.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference4. Breen, R., 1991, The Accelerated Binomial Option Pricing Model, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 26, 153-164.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference5. Bunch, D., and H. Johnson, 1992, A Simple and Numerically Efficient Valuation Method for American Puts Using a Modified Geske-Johnson Approach, Journal of Finance 47, 809-816.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference6. Boyle, P., M. Broadie, and P. Glasserman, 1997, Monte Carlo methods for security pricing, Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 21, 1267-1322.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference7. Barone-Adesi, G., and R. Whaley, 1987, Efficient Analytic Approximation of American Option Values, Journal of Finance 42, 301.-320zh_TW
dc.relation.reference8. Broadie M., and D. Jerome, 1996, American Option Valuation: New Bounds, Approximations, and a Comparison of Existing Methods, The Review of Financial Studies 9, 1211-1250.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference9. Cox, J. C., S. A. Ross, and M. Rubinstein, 1979, Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach, Journal of Financial Economics 7, 229-263zh_TW
dc.relation.reference10. Carr, P., R. Jarrow, and R. Myneni, 1992, Alternative characterizations of American put options, Mathematical Finance 2, 87-106.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference11. Drezner Z., 1978, Computation of the Bivariate Normal Integral, Mathematics of Computation, 32, 277-279.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference12. David S. B. and H. Johnson, 2000, The American Put Option and Its Critical Stock Price, Journal of Finance, 55, 2333-2357.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference13. Geske, R., and H. E. Johnson, 1984, The American Put Option Valued Analytically, Journal of Finance 23, 1511-1524.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference14. Hull, J. C., and A. White, 1988, The Use of the Control Variate Technique in Option Pricing, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 23, 237-251zh_TW
dc.relation.reference15. Hull, J. C., and A. White, 1990, Valuing Derivative Securities Using the Explicit Finite Difference Method, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 25, 87-100.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference16. Huang J., M. G. Subrahmanyam, and G. G. Yu, 1996, Pricing and Hedging American Options: A Recursive Integration Method, The Review of Financial Studies 9, 277-300.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference17. Hull, J. C., 2003, Options, Futures, and Other Derivative Securities, 4th edition.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference18. Ibanez A., 2003, Robust pricing of the American put option: A note on Richardson extrapolation and the early exercise premium, Management Science 49, 1210-1228zh_TW
dc.relation.reference19. Johnson, H. E., 1983, An Analytic Approximation for the American Put Price, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 18, 141-149.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference20. Kim J., 1990, The Analytic Valuation of American Options, The Review of Financial Studies 3, 547-572.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference21. Kamrad B., and P. Ritchken, 1991, Multinomial approximating models for options with k-state variables, Management Science 37, 1640-1652zh_TW
dc.relation.reference22. Longstaff F., and E. Schwartz, 2001, Valuing American Options by Simulation:A Simple Least-Squares Approach, The Review of Financial Studies 14, 113-147zh_TW
dc.relation.reference23. Leisen, and P. J. Dietmar, 1998, Pricing the American put option: A detailed convergence analysis for binomial models, Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 22, 1419-1435.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference24. Leisen, and P. J. Dietmar, 1999, The random-time binomial model, Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 23, 1355-1386.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference25. Moreno M., and J. F. Navas., 2003, On the Robustness of Least-Squares Monte Carlo (LSM) for Pricing American Derivatives, Review of Derivatives Research 6, 107-128zh_TW
dc.relation.reference26. Nengjiu J., and R. Zhong, 1999, An approximate formula for pricing American options, Journal of Derivatives 7, 31-41.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference27. Parkinson M., 1977, Option Pricing – The American Put, The Journal of Business 50, 21-36.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference28. Pantazopoulos K. N., E. N. Houstis, and S. Kortesis, 1998, Front-Tracking Finite Difference Methods for the Valuation of American Options, Computational Economics 12, 255-273.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference29. Rogers L. C. G., 2002, Monte Carlo valuation of American options, Mathematical Finance 12, 271-286.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference30. Stephen E., 1996, A note on modified lattice approaches to option pricing, Journal of Futures Markets 16, 585-594.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference31. Sullivan M, 2000, Valuing American put options using Gaussian quadrature, The Review of Financial Studies 13, 75-94.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference32. Trigeorgis, L., 1991, A Log-Transformed Binomial Numerical Analysis Method for Valuing Complex Multi-Option Investments, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 26, 309-326zh_TW
dc.relation.reference33. Tian, Y., 1999, A flexible binomial option pricing model, The Journal of Futures Markets 19, 817-843.zh_TW
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
56036101.pdf14.18 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56036102.pdf12.38 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56036103.pdf15.68 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56036104.pdf15.98 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56036105.pdf23.45 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56036106.pdf23.77 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56036107.pdf17.48 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56036108.pdf84.45 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56036109.pdf2.34 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56036110.pdf16.58 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56036111.pdf25.56 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56036112.pdf24.6 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.