Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37058
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor耿曙zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorKeng, Shuen_US
dc.contributor.author蔣逸青zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChiang, Yi Chingen_US
dc.creator蔣逸青zh_TW
dc.creatorChiang, Yi Chingen_US
dc.date2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-18T12:38:10Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-18T12:38:10Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-18T12:38:10Z-
dc.identifierG0095260006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37058-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description東亞研究所zh_TW
dc.description95260006zh_TW
dc.description97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract登陸台灣人在中國大陸與台灣兩地的跨界生活,形塑了兩地的生活空間及社會網絡,本研究的問題意識在於,個人層次的接觸、互動與熟識,是否有助於個人在社會互動情境中親身認識及了解他人,減少以類屬性的刻板印象去看待外團體成員,因此可以降低族群偏見、促進移民的當地化?經過2007年及2008年兩次的田野調查,在東莞及上海地區深度訪談三十位當地台灣人之後,本研究初步發現,在接觸的第一階段,當台灣人接觸愈來愈多的大陸人之後,將消除原先的偏見,形成心理「基模」,一方面,部分受訪者表示其原先持有的偏見獲得證實,亦即台灣人對大陸人的偏見消除了,但因而產生負面態度,反之,有些受訪者破除其對大陸人的偏見,進而對大陸人抱持正面態度;到了接觸的第二階段,一旦個人的心理基模形成,其乃決定繼續接觸或阻絕接觸大陸人的關鍵;最後,來到接觸的第三階段,繼續接觸大陸人的台灣人,逐漸同情理解當地文化,反之,阻絕接觸大陸人的台灣人,始終無法融入當地人的社交網絡。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe theory of intergroup contact maintains that the key to reduce intergroup prejudice is through contacts between the groups under optimal conditions. The main concerns of this dissertation are as following: Would it be possible for Taiwanese to reduce their prejudice toward Chinese through intergroup contacts? And, would the intergroup contacts help Taiwanese immigrants integrate into local community? Grounding on these two questions, this dissertation examines the impacts of intergroup contact between Taiwanese and Chinese through field study in Dongguan and Shanghai from 2007 to 2008. After interviewing thirty Taiwanese immigrants, my empirical research suggests that the contact process can be divided into three stages. First, at the earliest stage, by contacting more and more local residents, Taiwanese immigrants would reduce their prejudice and thus cultivate a sometimes positive and sometimes negative attitude toward Chinese. At the second stage, the attitude cultivated in earlier stage turns into the schema and then plays an important role in conditioning sequent contacts: those who have a positive attitude would open up and get along with local Chinese while those who have a negative attitude would refuse to get in touch with Chinese. At the third and final stage, those who open themselves up would have sympathetic understanding of local culture and adapt to local community gradually while those who refuse to contact Chinese would have difficulties integrating into local community.\nKeywords: intergroup contact, localization, social identity, Taishang Studyen_US
dc.description.tableofcontents壹、緒論…………………………………………………………….. 08\n  一、研究緣起………………………………………………….. 09\n  二、問題意識………………………………………………….. 11\n貳、文獻回顧與研究設計………………………………………….. 13\n  一、移民與身份認同…………………………………………... 13\n  二、民族國族認同之爭論……………………………………... 14\n  三、連綴社群與多元認同…………………………………….. 20\n  四、研究架構與假說………………………………………….. 23\n  五、研究方法及流程………………………………………….. 26\n參、群際接觸對當地化的影響…………………………………….. 29\n  一、接觸管道………………………………………………….. 29\n  二、接觸程度………………………………………………….. 36\n  三、當地化指標……………………………………………….. 41\n  四、小結……………………………………………………….. 50\n肆、群際接觸的階段效果…………………………………………... 52\n  一、第一階段:偏見消除…………………………………….. 53\n  二、第二階段:阻絕接觸或繼續接觸……………………….. 56\n  三、第三階段:無法融入或同情理解……………………….. 56\n  四、小結……………………………………………………….. 62\n伍、結論…………………………………………………………….. 65\n參考文獻……………………………………………………………. 69\n附錄一 訪談題綱…………………………………………………. 74\n附錄二 訪談對象一覽表…………………………………………. 75zh_TW
dc.format.extent108787 bytes-
dc.format.extent577232 bytes-
dc.format.extent172552 bytes-
dc.format.extent64217 bytes-
dc.format.extent110320 bytes-
dc.format.extent333168 bytes-
dc.format.extent490181 bytes-
dc.format.extent540617 bytes-
dc.format.extent460898 bytes-
dc.format.extent285843 bytes-
dc.format.extent230464 bytes-
dc.format.extent249486 bytes-
dc.format.extent144227 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095260006en_US
dc.subject當地化zh_TW
dc.subject台商研究zh_TW
dc.subject社會認同zh_TW
dc.subject群際接觸zh_TW
dc.subjectIntergroup Contacten_US
dc.subjectLocalizationen_US
dc.subjectSocial Identityen_US
dc.subjectTaishang Studyen_US
dc.title群際接觸對登陸台灣人當地化之影響:以東莞及上海為例zh_TW
dc.titleThe Impacts of Intergroup Contacts on the Localization of Taiwanese Immigrants in China: The Study of Dongguan and Shanghaien_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference一、中文zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnderson, Benedict著,吳叡人譯,想像的共同體:民族主義的起源和散布(台北:時報,1999)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAronson, Elliot, Timothy D. Wilson & Robin M. Akert著,余伯泉、李茂興譯,社會心理學(台北:弘智出版社,2003)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaron, R. A. & D. Byrne著,曾華源、劉曉春譯,社會心理學(台北:洪葉文化,2000)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrehm, Kassin & Fein著,王慶福、洪光遠、程淑華、王郁茗譯,社會心理學(台北:雙葉書廊,2007)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGellner, Ernest著,李金梅譯,國族主義(台北:聯經,2000)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMarger, Martin N.著,祖力亞提.司馬義譯,族群社會學(北京:華夏出版社,2007)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmith, Anthony D.著,龔維斌、良警宇譯,全球化時代的民族與民族主義(北京:中央編譯出版社,2002)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTaylor, Shellsy E., Letitia Anne Peplau & David O. Sears著,張滿玲譯,社會心理學(台北:雙葉書廊,2003)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWeber, Ann L.著,趙居蓮譯,社會心理學(台北:雙葉書廊,1995)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWoodward, Kathryn著,林文琪譯,認同與差異(台北:韋伯文化,2006)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference于國欽,「9月對大陸出口 7年來首見衰退」,工商時報(台北),2008年11月29日,A5版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王明珂,華夏邊緣:歷史記憶與族群認同(台北:允晨,1997)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王甫昌,「族群接觸機會?還是族群競爭?:本省閩南人族群意識內涵與地區差異模式之解釋」,台灣社會學,第四期(2002年12月),頁11~74。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference方孝謙,「全球化衝擊下大陸台商的認同問題」,許光泰、方孝謙、陳永生編,世貿組織與兩岸發展(台北:政大國關中心,2003),頁489~504。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference石之瑜,兩岸關係概論(台北:揚智,1998)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference石之瑜、姚源明,「社會科學認同的幾個途徑」,東亞研究,第35卷第1期(2004年7月),頁1~36。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference白德華,「珠三角經濟轉型 台商哀鴻遍野」,中國時報(台北),2008年8月4日,A2版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference白德華,「金融寒冬 上海商家猛打哆嗦」,中國時報(台北),2008年11月23日,A11版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳玉山,抗衡或扈從:兩岸關係新詮(台北:正中書局,1997)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳乃德,「自由主義和族群認同:搜尋台灣民族主義的意識形態基礎」,台灣政治學刊,第一期(1996年7月),頁5~39。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳乃德,「麵包與愛情:初探台灣民眾民族認同的變動」,台灣政治學刊,第9卷第2期(2005年12月),頁5~39。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference汪宏倫,「制度脈絡、外部因素與台灣之『national question』的特殊性:一個理論與經驗的反省」,台灣社會學,第一期(2001年6月),頁183~219。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李志勇,台商『異∕己』:『異域∕故鄉』之認同區辨」(以上海從事文化產業的台商為例),廣州中山大學人類學系碩士論文(2008)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李英明,重構兩岸與世界圖像(台北:生智,2002)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李美枝,「台灣地區族群與國族認同的顯性與隱性意識」,本土心理學研究,第20期(2003年12月),頁39~71。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference伊慶春、章英華,「對娶外籍與大陸媳婦的態度:社會接觸的重要性」,台灣社會學,第十二期(2006年12月),頁191~232。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference侯玉波編,社會心理學(北京:北京大學出版社,2002)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference莊耀嘉,「族群與偏見在兩岸關係中的角色:社會認同理論的檢驗」,本土心理學研究,第20期(2003年12月),頁73~104。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張亞中,兩岸統合論(台北:生智,2000)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張瑩瑞、佐斌,「社會認同理論及其發展」,心理科學進展(北京),第14卷第3期(2006年),頁475~480。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳皎眉、王叢桂、孫蒨如,社會心理學(台北:雙葉書廊,2006)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳朝政,「台商在兩岸的認同與流動:經驗研究與政策分析」,東吳大學政治學系博士論文(2005)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference馬岳琳,「上班族的中國愁」,天下雜誌(台北),2007年4月25日,頁113。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳永生編,世貿組織與兩岸發展(台北:政大國關中心,2003)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳皎眉、王叢桂、孫蒨如,社會心理學(台北:雙葉書廊,2006)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference耿曙,「『資訊人』抑或『台灣人』?:大上海地區高科技台商的國家認同」,發表於第二屆政治與資訊研討會(宜蘭:佛光人文社會學院政治研究所主辦,2002年4月11~12日)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference耿曙,「連綴社群:WTO背景下兩岸民間互動的分析概念」,許光泰、方孝謙、陳永生編,世貿組織與兩岸發展(台北:政大國關中心,2003),頁57~87。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference耿曙、林琮盛,「全球化背景下的兩岸關係與台商角色」,中國大陸研究,第48卷第1期(2005年3月),頁1~28。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄧建邦,「我們是誰?跨社會流動下中國大陸台商的認同」,發表於第二屆「跨界流離:公民身份、認同與反抗」國際學術研討會(台北:世新大學,2005年12月9~10日)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference魏鏞,「邁向民族內共同體:台海兩岸互動模式之建構、發展與檢驗」,中國大陸研究,第45卷第5期(2002年9~10月),頁1~55。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference行政院大陸事務委員會,兩岸經濟統計月報,第188期。<http://www.mac.gov.tw/big5/statistic/em/188/index.htm>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference「97年9月份兩岸貿易情勢分析」,兩岸貿易統計。<http://cweb.trade.gov.tw/kmi.asp?xdurl=kmif.asp&cat=CAT322>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference二、英文zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAllport, Gordon W., The Nature of Prejudice (Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1954).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAppadurai, Arjun, “Disjuncture and Difference in Global Cultural Economy,” in Mike Featherstone ed., Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalization and Modernity (London: Sage Publications, 1990), pp. 295~310.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBarth, Fredrik, “Introduction,” in Fredrik Barth ed., Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference (Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland, 1969), pp. 9~38.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBogardus, Emory S., “Social Distance and Its Origin,” Journal of Applied Sociology, Vol. 9 (1925), pp.216~226.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrown, Rupert, Prejudice: Its Social Psychology (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1995).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGeertz, Clifford, “Integrative Revolution: Primordial Sentiments and Civil Politics in the New States,” in Clifford Geertz ed., The Interpretation of Cultures (New York: Basic Books, 1973), pp. 255~311.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeng, Shu, Lu-huei Chen & Kuan-bo Huang, “Sense, Sensitivity, and Sophistication in Shaping the Future of Cross-Strait Relations,” Issues & Studies, Vol. 42, No.4 (December 2006), pp. 23~66.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeck, Margaret E. & Kathryn Sikkink, Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998).zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePettigrew, Thomas F., “Intergroup Contact: Theory, Research and New Perspectives,” Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 49 (1998), pp. 65~85.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRisse-Kappen, Thomas ed., Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-state Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions (Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmith, Anthony D., The Ethnic Origins of Nations (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1986).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTajfel, Henri. & Turner, John C., “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior,” in Stephen Worchel and William G. Austin eds., Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Chicago: Nelson Hall, 1986), pp. 7~24.zh_TW
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.openairetypethesis-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
000601.pdf106.24 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
000602.pdf563.7 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
000603.pdf168.51 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
000604.pdf62.71 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
000605.pdf107.73 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
000606.pdf325.36 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
000607.pdf478.69 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
000608.pdf527.95 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
000609.pdf450.1 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
000610.pdf279.14 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
000611.pdf225.06 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
000612.pdf243.64 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
000613.pdf140.85 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.