Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32991
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor詹志禹zh_TW
dc.contributor.author許嘉家zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorSyu,Jia Jiaen_US
dc.creator許嘉家zh_TW
dc.creatorSyu,Jia Jiaen_US
dc.date2006en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T07:02:24Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T07:02:24Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T07:02:24Z-
dc.identifierG0094152003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32991-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description教育研究所zh_TW
dc.description94152003zh_TW
dc.description95zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究欲探討個人知識論信念、創造性人格與創意生活經驗整體及各因素間的相互關係,最後並瞭解三者間的關連性。研究使用改編之「高中職生個人知識論信念量表」、「創造性人格量表」、以及吳靜吉(2002)等人所編製之「創意生活經驗量表」三種量表進行構念測量。分為北、中、南三區分層取樣,共803名受試,有效樣本共745人。問卷回收後,以描述性統計、Cronbach’s α信度係數、探索性因素分析、驗證性因素分析、皮爾森積差相關、獨立樣本t檢定、多元迴歸分析、及典型相關分析進行信效度考驗及各項研究問題分析。\n研究結果顯示:\n(1)高中職二年級學生個人知識論信念比一年級學生偏向純真型信念、更相信學習能力天生,且較不具創造性人格特質。\n(2)越持純真型個人知識論信念者,則其在人格特質上越不依從傳統、越不機\n智靈巧、也越不自主勇敢。\n(3)個人知識論信念越偏向純真型信念者,則其在創意生活經驗中的「運用新\n知精益求精」、「開放心胸」、「製造驚喜意外」及「舊瓶新裝」四個領域上\n的經驗越少。\n(4)當個體越具有創造性人格,就擁有越多創意生活經驗。\n(5)越持純真型個人知識論信念者,越不具有創造性人格特質;越不具有創造\n性人格特質者,也有較少的創意生活經驗產生;但個人知識論信念的傾向,\n對個體創意生活經驗並不具有直接的影響力。\n(6)個人知識論信念越「未分化」,則越不具有「創造性人格」,也越不常有「創\n意生活經驗」。\n由研究結果,建議可透過對學生個人知識論信念的調整,而間接促成創造力之有效提升。以下提出幾點對於教學實務上之建議:\n(1)讓學生透過「覺察、反思、行動、實踐」的歷程進行學習。\n(2)採用跨領域及討論式之教學方法進行教學。\n(3)增強學生對學習的正向思考。\n另提出對未來研究之幾點建議:\n(1)可對個人知識論信念之「依領域而不同」進行探究。\n(2)以「實驗研究法」探討個人知識論信念與創造力之關係。\n(3)針對高中職階段學生的「智力本質觀」與學習動機之相關進行探究。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study is to explore the relationship among personal epistemology belief, creative personality and creative life experience. Three scales were used to measure those constructs, “Personal Epistemology Scale for High School Student”, “Creative Personality Scale”, and “Creative Life Experience Scale”. There are 803 high school students from north, middle and south areas of Taiwan participated in this survey.\nThe descriptive statistic, Cronbach’s α coefficient analysis, explorative factor analysis, confirmative factor analysis, Pearson’s correlation analysis, independent student test, multiple regression analysis and classical correlation analysis were used to analysis data. The main findings of this study were:\n1. The personal epistemology belief of second grade high school students were naiver than first grades students, and with less creative personality.\n2. The one who tends to hold naïve personal epistemology belief, may obey tradition less, and with less witty and braveness.\n3. The one who tends to have naïve personal epistemology belief, would have less creative experience.\n4. The one with more creative personality, the more creative life experiences he or she has.\n5.The less differentiation of personal epistemology belief, the less creative personality and creative life experience one has.\n Based on the findings, the following were suggested for teaching and future research:\nFor teaching:\n1. Learning by “knowing, reflection, action and practice”\n2. Using cross-areas and discussion instruction.\n3. Strengthen students’ positive thinking for learning.\nFor future research:\n1. To investigate the domain specific of personal epistemology belief thinking.\n2. Conduct the relation between personal epistemology belief and creativity by experimental method.\n3. To explore the relations of high school students’ entity intelligence belief and learning motivation.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論\n第一節 研究動機 …………………………………….……...……1\n第二節 研究目的與待答問題 …………………….…………...…4\n第三節 名詞釋義……………………………………………..……6\n第二章 文獻探討\n第一節 個人知識論信念相關理論 …………………………..…...9\n一、 個人知識論信念定義…………………….………..……9\n二、 個人知識信念模式介紹…………………………...…...11\n三、 個人知識信念的測量……………………………..……14\n第二節 創造力相關理論及研究 ………………..……..…………17\n一、 創造性人格 ……………………………………………18\n二、 創意生活經驗 …………………………………………23\n第三節 個人知識論信念與創造力 ………………...….…………25\n一、 個人知識論信念與創造性人格 ………………………26\n二、 個人知識信念與創意生活經驗 ………………………28\n 第四節 研究假設 ………………………………………...……….30\n第三章 研究設計與實施\n第一節 初步研究架構 ……………………………………………33\n第二節 研究工具 …………………………………………………35\n壹、預試-高中職生個人知識論信念量表……….…….……35\n貳、正式施測…………………………………….….….……44\n一、研究樣本……………………………………………..…44\n二、高中職生個人知識論信念量表……………………..…46\n三、創造性人格量表 ………………………………..……..51\n四、創意生活經驗量表 ……………………………...…….57\n 第四節 研究架構………………………………………...………...62\n第五節 研究程序 ………………………………………...………64\n第六節 資料處理與統計分析 …………………………...………65\n第四章 研究結果\n第一節 高中職生個人知識論信念、創造性人格與創意生活經驗之現況分析 ………………………………..…………………67\n第二節 高中職生個人知識論信念與創造性人格…………………76\n第三節 高中職生個人知識論信念與創意生活經驗之關係…...….78\n第四節 高中職生創造性人格與創意生活經驗之關係……………82\n第五節 高中職生個人知識論信念與創造性人格與創意生活經驗\n之關係探討……………………………………….……….87\n 第六節 個人知識論信念情境依賴與未分化之探討……………..89\n\n第五章 討論與建議\n第一節 主要發現……………………………………………………93\n第二節 結論與討論 ………………………………………………..96\n第三節 研究限制…………………………………………………104\n第四節 建議……………………………………………………....105\n參考文獻\n附錄\n一、 個人知識論信念預試問卷…………………………115\n二、 正式施測問卷………………………………………118\n三、 個人知識論信念驗證性因素分析語法……………123\n四、 個人知識論信念共變數矩陣………………………123\n五、個人知識論信念驗證性因素分析適配指標……….127\n\n\n圖目錄\n圖3-1-1 初步研究架構圖 ………………………….……….……34\n圖3-2-1 個人知識論信念模式路徑圖……………………………..50\n圖3-2-2 創造性人格探索性因素分析之陡坡圖…………….……..52\n圖3-4-1 研究架構圖………………………………………...………63\n\n\n表目錄\n表2-1-1 個人知識論信念之模式整理 ………….…………...….…13\n表2-1-2 Schommer知識信念量表因素說明 ……….……..……15\n表2-1-3 Schraw, Bendixen及Dunkle知識信念量表因素說明.…15\n表2-2-1 具創造力之研發人員創造力人格特質與衡量構面…...….21\n表3-2-1 問卷來源之研究對象及研究向度說明表………………...35\n表3-2-2 高中職生個人知識論信念量表編製來源………………...36\n表3-2-3 預試樣本分佈表 ……………………………….…..……38\n表3-2-4 高中職生個人知識論信念問卷預試信度值……….......…39\n表3-2-5 高中職生個人知識論信念正式問卷增題來源一覽表…...41\n表3-2-6 預試量表與正式量表之題目及題號對照表….…………..41\n表3-2-7 受試學校分佈表……………………….….……….….…...45\n表3-2-8 研究樣本在性別、年級及學校別之分佈……….…...…..46\n表3-2-9 高中職生各人知識論信念量表信度……….……..……...47\n表3-2-10 個人知識論信念五個因素相關係數表…….….….….…48\n表3-2-11 創造性人格因素結構矩陣…………..………………….52\n表3-2-12 創造性人格六個因素之信度表…………………………54\n表3-2-13 創造性人格因素命名……………………………………55\n表3-2-14 創造性人格四個因素之相關係數……………………..56\n表3-2-15 創意生活經驗量表信度值………………………………58\n表3-2-16 過去曾使用創意生活經驗量表之研究測得的信度值\n與本研究之比較…………………………………………60\n表3-2-17 創意生活經驗八個因素相關係數表……………… .......61\n表3-5-1 研究甘梯圖 ………………………………………......…64\n表4-1-1 高中職生個人知識論信念平均數、標準差、因素平均\n數以及選項填答百分比…………………..…..…………..68\n表4-1-2 高中職學生在創造性人格四個因素之平均數、標準差\n、各題題數及人數………………………………………..70\n表4-1-3 高中職學生創意生活經驗之平均數、標準差、題數及\n人數………………………………………………………..71\n表4-1-4 性別在個人知識論信念上之t考驗分析表………….…..72\n表4-1-5 性別在創造性人格上之t考驗分析表…………………...72\n表4-1-6 性別在創意生活經驗上之t考驗分析表……………...…73\n表4 -1-7 年級在個人知識論信念上之t考驗分析表………..…..74\n表4-1-8 年級在創造性人格上之t考驗分析表………………...…75\n表4-1-9 年級在創意生活經驗上之t考驗分析表………………...75\n表4-2-1 高中職學生個人知識論信念與創造性人格之相關…......76\n表4-3-1 高中職生個人知識論信念與創意生活經驗的相關…......78\n表4-3-2 高中職生個人知識論信念對創意生活經驗之迴歸分析表………………………………...………………………..79\n表4-3-3 個人知識論信念各因素對創意生活經驗各因素之典型\n相關分析摘要表………………….………………………81\n表4-4-1 創造性人格與創意生活經驗之相關係數表……….…..82\n表4-4-2 創造性人格對創意生活經驗之變異數分析摘要表….....83\n表4-4-3 高中職生創造性人格對創意生活經驗之迴歸分析表.....83\n表4-4-4 創造性人格各因素對創意生活經驗各因素之典型相關\n分析摘要表……………………………………………….86\n表4-5-1 個人知識論信念與創造性人格對創意生活經驗變異數\n分析摘要表……………………………………………….87\n表4-5-2 高中職生個人知識論信念與創造性人格對創意生活經\n驗之迴歸分析表…………………………….…...……….88\n表4-6-1 性別在個人知識論信念「領域特定」及「未分化」上\n之t考驗分析表…………………………………………..89\n表4-6-2 年級在個人知識論信念「領域特定」及「未分化」上\n之t考驗分析表…………………………………………..90\n表4-6-3 高中職學生個人知識論信念勾選不知道者與創造性人\n格之相關分析表………………………….………………90\n表4-6-4 高中職生個人知識論信念與創意生活經驗的相關分\n析表………………………………………………………..91zh_TW
dc.format.extent47703 bytes-
dc.format.extent82409 bytes-
dc.format.extent118552 bytes-
dc.format.extent35397 bytes-
dc.format.extent103500 bytes-
dc.format.extent132142 bytes-
dc.format.extent266950 bytes-
dc.format.extent516883 bytes-
dc.format.extent385925 bytes-
dc.format.extent171450 bytes-
dc.format.extent122072 bytes-
dc.format.extent305047 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094152003en_US
dc.subject個人知識論信念zh_TW
dc.subject創造性人格zh_TW
dc.subject創意生活經驗zh_TW
dc.subject高中職生zh_TW
dc.subjectpersonal epistemology beliefen_US
dc.subjectcreative personalityen_US
dc.subjectcreative life experienceen_US
dc.subjecthigh school studentsen_US
dc.title高中職生個人知識論信念與創造性人格、創意生活經驗之關係zh_TW
dc.titleThe Relationship Among Personal Epistemology Belief, Creative Personality and Creative Life Experience of High School Students in Taiwanen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference王麗文(1981)。國中生認知發展與創造力之相關硏究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference毛連塭(2000)。創造力研究的發展。輯於毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台,創造力研究(pp. 56-114)。台北市:心理。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱建民(2003)。知識論。台北縣:空大。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳幼妃(1984)。大學生認知形式、創造性人格與創造傾向關係之研究。教育學刊,5,143-172。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李毓娟(1996)。大學生的心情經驗及其相關因素之研究--性別、心情經驗與幽默創意、學業成績之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference何宗翰(1997)。主修領域背景對大學生知識信念與學習策略的影響。國zh_TW
dc.relation.reference立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference辛翰(1999)。讓學生變被動為主動學習。湖北教育,16(5),38-39。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference沈明權(1999)。個人特質、組織特性與組織創新之硏究。國立中央大學人力資源管理硏究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳明隆(2000)。SPSS統計應用實務。台北市:文魁。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳靜吉(1983)。創造性人格量表介紹。國立政治大學創造力理論研討上課資料,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳靜吉(2001)。華人學生創造力的發掘與培育。研討會演講稿。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳靜吉(2002)。創意生活經驗量表之編制。國立政治大學創造力理論研討上課資料,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳翠霞(2005)。「以調整知識信念為主的教學及班級經營策略」對高中生學習表現之影響。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李乙明、李淑貞(譯)(2005)。Robert J. Sternberg (編)。創造力Ⅰ˙理論。(譯自Handbook of Creativity)。台北市:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李乙明、李淑貞(譯)(2005)。Robert J. Sternberg (編)。創造力Ⅱ˙應用。(譯自Handbook of Creativity)。台北市:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference杜明城(譯)(2006)。Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi(著)。創造力。台北市:時報文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林幸台(2000)。創造力評量。輯於毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台,創造力研究(pp264-304)。台北市:心理。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林紀慧(2001),知識學習信念與不同電腦繪圖型態的國小電腦數學學習成效研究,新竹師院學報,14,69-85。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林麗華(2002)。目標導向、社會比較、自我效能與課業壓力關係之研究。彰化師範大學輔導與諮商研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周淑真(2005)。研發人員創造力人格特質,社會網絡關係,吸納能力與創新能力關係之研究。輔仁大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference洪蘭(譯)(1999)。Robert J. Sternberg & Todd I. Lubart(著)。不同凡想-在一窩風文化中開拓創造力。台北市:遠流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference孫振青(1982)。知識論。台北市:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference翁雅欣(2004)。成人學習者知識論信念與學習型態關係之研究—以碩士在職專班學生為例。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳昭儀(1991)。二十位傑出發明家的生涯路。台北市:心理。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳淑惠(1999)。台灣地區學生創造力發展及其相關因素之研究 : 年級、性別、教師教學創新行為、父母教養態度、社會支持與創意經驗、創造思考能力之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳木金(2000)。國民小學教師創造性人格特質與美育教學之關係研究。藝術學報,65,161-170。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳美岑(1999)。高職實用技能班美髮技術科創造考教學方案之實施成效。國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張嘉芬(1997)。國小高年級學生依附風格、創意教養環境與創造行為之關係。國立政治大學教育硏究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張春興(2000)。教育心理學。台北市:東華。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張起華(2001)。資訊人員的工作特性、創造力人格特質與工作滿足之相關性研究。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳偉昌(2001)。職業學校機械科學生技術能力與創造力之相關硏究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育硏究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張世彗(2003)。創造力-理論、技術/技法與培育。台北市:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳萩卿(2004)。知識信念影響學習運作模式之驗證暨「調整知識信念的教學策略」對國中生學習歷程影響之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃晴逸(2004)。國小學童思考風格量表之編製及其與創造力之相關硏究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育硏究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference游健弘 (2003)。CoRT創造思考教學對國小資優班學生語文創造能力學習成效之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。台北市,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference詹志禹(2002)。「創造力」的定義與創造力的發展-兒童會創造嗎?教育研究月刊,100,117-124。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference溫明麗(2003)。皮亞傑與批判性思考教學。台北市:洪葉文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉鶴龍(1996)。資訊電子產業科技人員與非科技人員創造力之硏究。國立政治大學科技管理硏究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡瓊華(2004)。高中學生知識信念、學習風格與學業成就之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心裡與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference盧雪梅(1980)。創造性人格特質。創造思考教育,2,33-39。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference謝榮桂(1999)。高科技研發人員創造力人格評鑑量表與系統之建立 : 以資訊與半導體業為例。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference謝德鑫、陳宏志、邱柄儒、李若愚、朱文禎、黃文聰、劉建人(2006)(譯)。Elias M. Awad & Hassan M. Ghaziri(著)。知識管理。台中市:滄海。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鐘聖校(1990)(譯)。有關創造力的幾個基本觀念。載於資優學生創造力與特殊才能,中華民國特殊教育學會主編。台北:心理。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蘇錦榮(1998)。新竹科學園區資訊電子產業研發人員、技術人員與非科技人員創造力之研究。國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。台北市,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAdam, K. & Jessic, K. (1985). The social science encyclopedia. London: Kogan Page.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAguilar, A. A. (1996). Personality and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(6), 959-969.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBarron, F. (1953). Complexity-simplicity as a personality dimension. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 393-399.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBelenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women`s ways of knowing :Tthe development of self, voice, and mind. New York : BasicBookszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaxter Magolda, M. B. (1987). The affective dimention of learning: Faculty-student relationships that enhance intellectual development. College Student Journal, 21, 46-58.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCano, F. (2005). Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 203-221.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDavis, G. A. (1986). Creativity is forever. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFledman, D. H. (1989). Universal to unique: Toward a cultural-genetic epistemology. Archive de Psychologie, 56,271-279.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGardner, H.(1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligence. New York: Basic Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGolann, S.E. (1963). Psychological study of creativity. Psychological Bulletin, 60, 548-565.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGough, H.G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the adjective check list. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8) , 1398-1405.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHocevar, D. (1981). Measurment of creativity review and critique. Journal of Personality assessment, 45(5), 450-464.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemologicalzh_TW
dc.relation.referencetheories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowledge and their relation tozh_TW
dc.relation.referencelearning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88-140.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKnapp, R. (1962). A factor analysis of Thorndike’ rating of eminent men. Journal of Social Psychology, 56, 67-71.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKatz, A. N. (1984). Creative styles: Relating tests of creativity to the work patterns of scientists. Personality and Individual Differences, 5(3), 281-292.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKing, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S.(1994). Developing reflective judgement: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKitchener, K. S., & King, P. M. (1981). Reflective judgment: Concepts of justification and their relationship to age and education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2, 89-116.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMacKinnon, D. (1962). The personality correlates of creativity: A study of American architects. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Congress of Applied Psychology, 2, 11-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOldham, G. R. & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607-734.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePerry, W. G., Jr. (1968). Patterns of development in thought and values of students in a liberal arts college: A validation of a scheme. Cambridge, MA: Bureau of Study Counsel, Harvard University (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 024315).zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePerry, W. G.(1981). Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of meaning. In A. Chickering(Ed.), The modern American college(pp. 76-116). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRoe, A. (1952). A psychologist examines sixty-four eminent scientists. Scientific American, 187(5), 21-25.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRoe, A. (1953). The making of a scientist. NY: Dodd, Mead.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceReybold, L. E.(2001). Encouraging the transformation of personal epistemology. Qualitative studies in education, 14(3), 413-428.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSteinberg, L. (1964). Creativity as a character trait: An expanding concept. California Journal of Instructional Improvement, 7, 13-25.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSternberg, R. J.,(1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677-688.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498-504.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchommer, M. (1994). Synthesizing epistemological belief research: Tentative understandings and provocative confusions. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 293-319.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchraw, G. S., Bendixen, L. D., & Dunkle, M. E. (2002). Development and validation of the epistemic belief inventory (EBI). In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich(Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowledge(pp. 261-275). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchoenfeld, A. H. (1983). Beyond the purely cognitive: Belief systems, social cognitions, and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance. Cognitive Science, 7, 329-363.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. NY: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTerman, L. (1955). Are scientists different? Scientist America, 192(1), 25-29.zh_TW
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypethesis-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
200301.pdf46.58 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200302.pdf80.48 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200303.pdf115.77 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200304.pdf34.57 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200305.pdf101.07 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200306.pdf129.04 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200307.pdf260.69 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200308.pdf504.77 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200309.pdf376.88 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200310.pdf167.43 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200311.pdf119.21 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200312.pdf297.9 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.