1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 傳播學院
  3. 傳播學院碩士在職專班
  4. 學位論文
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33082
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor鍾蔚文zh_TW
dc.contributor.author蕭慧芬zh_TW
dc.creator蕭慧芬zh_TW
dc.date2004en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T07:27:37Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T07:27:37Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T07:27:37Z-
dc.identifierG0090941008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33082-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description傳播學院碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description90941008zh_TW
dc.description93zh_TW
dc.description.abstract如果Alfred Hitchcock的電影會讓觀眾驚聲尖叫，如果喜劇泰斗Charlie Chaplin的戲劇會讓觀眾捧腹大笑；那麼真實的跳樓新聞、真實的滅門血案鏡頭，會不會讓觀眾痛苦難耐？\n\n本篇論文企圖橫跨新聞學與心理學兩大領域，探討影響台灣民眾日常生活至深的電視新聞，其所播放的新聞畫面會帶給觀眾怎樣的心理衝擊？\n\n本研究鎖定兩大主軸，第一、悲劇性新聞是否較中性新聞更易引發觀看者的負向情緒？第二、同樣的悲劇性新聞，若賦與不同的畫面剪輯，是否會導致觀看者出現不同的情緒反應？本研究之結論如下：其一、以新聞類型區分：悲劇性新聞〈跳樓及滅門血案〉和中性新聞同樣不會強烈引發觀看者的負向情緒；有趣的是，當觀看者愈覺得悲劇性新聞帶給其負向情緒，那麼就會愈感到中性新聞所具備的正向情緒；顯見不同類型的新聞會相互影響情緒反應。其二、以新聞畫面區隔：無論是醫院急診室等相關畫面，或直接呈現跳樓及滅門血案的鏡頭，兩者引發的情緒反應並沒有“顯著差異”；僅管差異性不強，但觀看跳樓、血跡鏡頭確確實實會引發較多的負向情緒，尤其看到墜樓鏡頭會特別感到“緊張、害怕”。當然，收看悲劇性新聞不全然是負向情緒表現較為突出，本研究也發現觀看者在正向情緒反應上，顯示出相當“關心、關愛”悲劇性新聞。\n\n至於悲劇性新聞的鏡頭處理與觀眾情緒反應之間的關連性，實驗結果顯示：畫面內容具震憾性、色調明亮、特寫鏡頭、跟拍鏡頭、畫面時間長、具聲音效果者，都會讓人印象深刻。在男女性別研究上，本論文發現不同性別收看悲劇性新聞時會各自站在不同的角色去詮釋新聞：女性會站在弱勢的被害人角度，而男性則易傾向消防員、旁觀者甚或兇嫌的立場來看待此類新聞；思考立場相左，因而產生女性收看悲劇性新聞的負向情緒較男性為強的結果。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIf Afred Hitchock’s horror films can make an audience scream out loud, and if Charlie Chaplin’s comedies can make an audience laugh until their stomach hurt, then would real life news footage of people jumping off buildings and bloody murders cause an audience to feel sad? This thesis combines the studies of journalism and psychology to explore how broadcast news psychologically impacts Taiwanese audiences.\n\nThis study focuses on 1) whether tragic news negatively influences viewers` mood more easily than neutral news does; and 2) if the same story edited with different images, causes viewers to feel differently. This study concludes that 1) based on news type: both neutral news and tragic news don`t appear to have a negative effect on viewers. More interestingly, the more that viewers feel that sad or bloody news brings a negative mood, the more they feel that neutral news positively affects their mood. And 2) based on the images types: if images like those of an emergency room are replaced by images of people leaping off buildings, using the same narrative, it doesn`t make viewers feel any more or less negative. What`s notable, however, is that when viewers see images of bloody scenes or of people jumping off buildings, the images still make them feel \"nervous\" or \"afraid.\" On the other hand, this report also finds that viewers feel especially concerned or empathetic towards what is presented in news stories.\n\nAs for how tragedy news images influences views’ mood, this report finds that the event`s emotional impact, the color tone, brightness, close-ups shots, following shots, length of cut and sounds all contribute to the impression the story leaves on the viewer. On the difference between how men and women react to new stories, the statistics show that women will empathize with the victim and men tend to take the viewpoint of the fireman, witness or the suspect. Because men and women think differently, tragedy news stories affect the mood of women more than they affect the mood of men.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第壹章 緒論 1\n第一節 研究動機 ………..…………………………………….. 1\n第二節 問題意識與研究目的（聲音與影像的戰爭） …………... 3\n\n第貳章 文獻探討 6\n第一節 視覺感官如何引發負面情緒 …………………………….. 6\n第二節 視覺感官引發哪些負面情緒 …………………………….. 9\n\n第參章 研究方法 13\n第一節 研究之思考架構 ………………………………….……... 13\n第二節 測量方法 ………………………………………… 15\n第三節 研究設計 – 實驗文本的製作 …………………………… 19\n\n第肆章 悲劇性新聞對觀眾的心理衝擊 ~ 研究結果分析　 27\n第一節 新聞類型與觀眾情緒反應的關連性 ……………………… 28 \n第二節 新聞畫面與觀眾情緒反應的關連性 ……………………… 34 \n第三節 悲劇性新聞的『單一構圖』與觀眾印象深淺的關連性 … 41\n第四節 悲劇性新聞的『整體架構』與觀眾印象深淺的關連性 … 51\n第五節 性別對於悲劇性新聞畫面的情緒差異 ………………… 59\n\n第伍章 結論與建議 61\n第一節 研究發現 …………………………………………………… 61\n第二節 研究限制 …………………………………………………… 65\n第三節 對實務工作者的建議 ……………………………………. 68\n\n第陸章 參考書目 75\n第一節 中文參考書目 ………………………………………….. 75\n第二節 英文參考書目 ………………………………………….. 77zh_TW
dc.format.extent43126 bytes-
dc.format.extent84582 bytes-
dc.format.extent101641 bytes-
dc.format.extent14129 bytes-
dc.format.extent60065 bytes-
dc.format.extent50620 bytes-
dc.format.extent70900 bytes-
dc.format.extent261148 bytes-
dc.format.extent181786 bytes-
dc.format.extent325269 bytes-
dc.format.extent540263 bytes-
dc.format.extent266816 bytes-
dc.format.extent99102 bytes-
dc.format.extent41592 bytes-
dc.format.extent110181 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090941008en_US
dc.subject悲劇性新聞zh_TW
dc.subject負向情緒zh_TW
dc.subjecttragedy news,en_US
dc.subjectnegative mooden_US
dc.title悲劇性新聞畫面對觀眾心理衝擊程度之初探zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference參考書目zh_TW
dc.relation.reference第一節、中文參考書目zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王秀（1996）：《生活事件、生活壓力及身心疾病的動力性關係》。國立台灣大學心理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王泰俐（2003）：〈從麥克魯漢觀點檢視本土電視研究與雙重文本概念的演變〉，《中華傳播學刊》，4: 145-184。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王泰俐（2004）：〈電視新聞節目「感官節目」之初探研究〉，《新聞學研究》，81: 1-40。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference公共電視研發部編（2000）：《災難報導與媒體的公共責任》。台北：公共電視。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference早坂泰次郎、北林才知（1997）：《電視心理學》。台北：生命潛能。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱光潛（1993）：《悲劇心理學 – 各種悲劇快感理論的批判研究》。台北：駱駝出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱玉芬（1995）：《新聞結構對情感及興趣之影響》。政治大學新聞研究所zh_TW
dc.relation.reference碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePierre Bourdieu 著，林志明譯（2002）：《布赫迪厄論電視》。台北：麥田。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRichard S. Lazarus & Bernice N. Lazarus 著，李素卿譯（2002）：《感性與理性 – 了解我們的情緒》。台北：五南。P.279、179。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李維（1994）：《是牆？還是橋？人類行為的分析》。台北：桂冠圖書。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJulia C. Berryman，David J. Hargreaves，Kevin Howells & Elizabeth M. Ockleford 著，武躍國、武國城譯（2002）：《心理與生活》。台北：五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林淑華（2001）：《情緒察覺評量表之發展：性別、憂鬱、情緒性質及情緒重要性之影響》。高雄醫學院健康科學院行為科學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference邱玉嬋（1996）：《電視新聞影音結構對回憶的影響》。國立中正大電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡佩怡（1997）：《恐慌發作認知模式之驗證：受試者組別與情境線索對吸入CO2/O2混合氣體效應之影響》。國立台灣大學心理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference袁之琦（1991）：《視覺訊息處理管道之互動關係研究》。國立台灣大學心理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNicholas Mirzoeff著，陳芸芸譯（2004）：《視覺文化導論心理》。台北：韋伯文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳鳳如（2001）：《我國報紙對重大災難新聞報導之研究—以九二一大地震為例》。國立台灣師範大學傳播研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference康裕撰（1987）：《音樂對情境焦慮與閱讀記憶之影響》。國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference崔麗娟等著（2002）：《心理學是什麼》。台北：揚智文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceK.T. Strongman 著，游恆山譯（2002）：《情緒心理學》。台北：五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference葛樹人（1999）：《心理測驗學》。台北：桂冠圖書。P487-488。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference葉怡君（1999）：《憂鬱對情緒性訊息處理之影響》。高雄醫學院行為科學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊博民（1997）：《心理實驗綱要》。台北：五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference臧國仁、蔡琰（2001）：〈新聞美學 – 試論美學對新聞研究與實務的啟示〉，《新聞學研究》，66:29-60。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference臧國仁、鍾蔚文（2000）：〈災難事件與媒體報導：相觀研究簡述〉，《新聞學研究》，62:143-151。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭昭明（1993）：《認知心理學》。台北：桂冠圖書。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭雅芬（1996）：《無望型憂鬱理論下--「特定易感受性假設」之驗證》。國立台灣大學心理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蕭君予（2001）：《創傷事件經歷者復原歷程之研究—以九二一受創者為例》。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceB.J. Underwood & Shaughnessy著，洪蘭，曾志朗譯（1997）：《心理學實驗研究方法》。台北：遠流。zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePaul Martin Lester著，張霄亭總校閱（2003）：《視覺傳播》。台北：雙葉書廊。P. 343、345zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRita L. Atkinson、Richard C. Arkinson、Edward E. Smith & Ernest R. Hilgard. 著，鄭伯勳，洪光遠譯（1991）：《心理學概論》。台北：桂冠圖書。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference英文參考書目zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAllan, S.（1999）. Newsculture. Buckingham: Open University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBarrie Gunter（1987）. Poor Reception: Misunderstanding and Forgetting Broadcast News. 219-258zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBBC（1993）. Producers’ Guidelines. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDaniel Y. Levin & Daniel J. Simons（2000）. Perceiving Stability in a Changing World: Combining Shots and Integrating Views in Motion Pictures and the Real Word. Media Psychology. 337-381.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceED Cairns （1988）. Impact of Television News Exposure on Children’s Perceptions of Violence in Northern Ireland. The Journal of Social Psychology. 453-457zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceE.M.Jr. & Lazarus, R.S.（1966）. Anxiety and Behavior. New York：Academic Press. pp225-262zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGraeme Burton （2002）. More than Meets the Eye: an introdution to media studies. London. 17-22. 169-174zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrings, W. W., & Dawson, M. E.（1978）. Emotions and bodily responses: Apsychophysiological approach. New York: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHayward Horton & Steven Stack（1984）. The effect of television on national suicide rate. The Journal of Social Psychology, 123, 141-142.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJamie L. Goldenberg, Tom Pyszczynski, Kerri D. Johnson, Jeff Greenberg & Sheldon Solomon（1999）. The appeal of Tragedy: a terror management prespective. Media Psychology. 313-329.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJennings Bryant and Dolf Zillmann（1991）. Responding To The Screen : Reception and Reaction Processes. 103-133zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJinok Son, Stephen D. Reese & William R. Davie（1987）. Effects of Visual-verbal redundancy and recaps on television news learning. Broadcast Education Assdication. pp. 207-216.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJohn Taylor（1998）. Body Horror：photojournalism,catastrophe and war. New York. 2-4zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKimmel, H.D.,van Olst,E.H. & Orlebeke, J.F.(Eds.)（1979）. The orienting reflex in humans. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKristen Harrison & Joanne Cantor（1999）. Media Psychology. Tales from the Screen：Enduring Fright Reactions to Scary Media. p.97-116zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLynn, R.（1966）. Attention, arousal and the orientation reaction. Oxford: Pergamon Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceM.Arnold（1970）. Feelings and emotions. New York：Academic Press. pp207-232zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMonica Suckfull（2000）. Film Analysis and Psychophysiology: Effects of Moments of Impact and Protagonists. 269-295.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMetallinos, N.（1996）. Television aesthetics: Perceptural, cognitive, and compositional bases. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePaul Martin Lester（1995）.Visual Communication : Images with Messages. USA. p. 125、418zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRichard S. Lazarus & Bernice N. Lazarus（1994）. Passion and Reason.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShirley Biagi（1995）. Media Impact: An introduction to mass mediat. p.281zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSinger, J.L. （1980）. The power and limitations of television: A cognitive-affective analysis. In P. H. Tannenbaum (Ed.), The entertainment funtions of television (pp.31-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSparks, C., & Tulloch, J. （2000）. Introduction: The panic over tabloid news.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIn C. Sparks & J. Tulloch (Eds.), Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards (pp.1-40). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStacy L. Smith & Barbara J. Wilson（2000）. Children’s reaction to a television news story: The impact of video footage and proximity of the crime. Communication Research. Vol 27(5): 641-673.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSteven J. Hoekstra, Richard Jackson Harris & Angela L. Helmick（1999）. Autobiographical memories about the experience of seeing frightening movies in childhood. Media Psychology. 117-140.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSusan Sontag（1979）. On Photography. New York. p. 41zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWendy M. Johnston & Graham C. L. Davey（1979）. The psychological impact of negative TV news bulletins: The catastrophizing of personal worries. British Journal of Psychology. Vol 99(1): 85-91.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWright, J. C. & Huston-Stein, A.（1979）. The influence of formal features in children’s television on attention and social behavior. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, San Francisco, CA.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZillmann, D. & Bryant, J. （1983）. Uses and effects of humor in educational ventures. In P.E. McGhee & J.H. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of humor research: Vol. 2. Applied studies (pp. 173-193). New York: Springer-Verlag.zh_TW
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
94100801.pdf42.12 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
94100802.pdf82.6 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
94100803.pdf99.26 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
94100804.pdf13.8 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
94100805.pdf58.66 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
94100806.pdf49.43 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
94100807.pdf69.24 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
94100808.pdf255.03 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
94100809.pdf177.53 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
94100810.pdf317.65 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
94100811.pdf527.6 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
94100812.pdf260.56 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
94100813.pdf96.78 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
94100814.pdf40.62 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
94100815.pdf107.6 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.